Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Coexistence and relative abundance in forest trees

Abstract

Contemporary acceleration of biodiversity loss makes increasingly urgent the need to understand the controls of species coexistence1,2. Tree diversity in particular plays a pivotal role in determining terrestrial biodiversity, through maintaining diversity of its dependent species3,4 and with them, their predators and parasites. Most theories of coexistence based on the principle of limiting similarity suggest that coexistence of competing species is inherently unstable; coexistence of competitors must be maintained by external forces such as disturbance5,6, immigration7 or ‘patchiness’ of resources in space and time8,9. In contrast, storage theory postulates stable coexistence of competing species through temporal alternation of conditions favouring recruitment of one species over the other10,11. Here we use storage theory to develop explicit predictions for relative differences between competitors that allow us to discriminate between coexistence models. Data on tree species from a primary forest on the Mexican Pacific coast support a general dynamic of storage processes determining coexistence of similar tree species in this community, and allow us to reject all other theories of coexistence.

Your institute does not have access to this article

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

$32.00

All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: Curves for values of f, the fraction of time in which recruitment for species 1 is ‘on’.
Figure 2: Fractional deviation of age classes from an expected exponential distribution.
Figure 3: Contrasts of common and rare congeneric taxa.

References

  1. May, R. M., Lawton, J. H. & Stork, N. E. in Extinction Rates (eds Lawton, J. H. & May, R. M.) 1–24 (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 1995)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Tilman, D. Causes, consequences and ethics of biodiversity. Nature 405, 208–211 (2000)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. May, R. M. How many species are there on Earth? Science 241, 1441–1449 (1988)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kelly, C. K. & Southwood, T. R. E. Species richness and resource availability: a phylogenetic analysis of insects associated with trees. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 8013–8016 (1999)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hutchinson, G. E. Homage to Santa Rosalia, or Why are there so many kinds of animals? Am. Nat. 93, 145–159 (1959)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Connell, J. H. Diversity in tropical rainforests and coral reefs. Science 199, 1302–1310 (1978)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hubbell, S. P. The Unified Neutral Theory of Biodiversity and Biogeography (Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, 2001)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Nee, S. & May, R. M. Dynamics of metapopulations: habitat destruction and competitive coexistence. J. Anim. Ecol. 61, 37–40 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Pacala, S. W. & Tilman, D. Limiting similarity in mechanistic and spatial models of plant competition in heterogeneous environments. Am. Nat. 143, 222–257 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chesson, P. L. & Warner, R. R. Environmental variability promotes coexistence in lottery competitive systems. Am. Nat. 117, 923–943 (1981)

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Chesson, P. L. & Huntly, N. Short-term instabilities and long-term community dynamics. Trends Ecol. Evol. 4, 293–298 (1989)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. MacArthur, R. H. & Levins, R. The limiting similarity, convergence and divergence of coexisting species. Am. Nat. 101, 377–385 (1967)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Tilman, D. Plant Strategies and the Dynamics and Structure of Plant Communities (Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, 1988)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kelly, C. K. et al. Investigations in commonness and rarity: a comparison of size distributions of co-occurring, congeneric Mexican trees. Ecol. Lett. 4, 618–627 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chesson, P. L. Mechanisms of maintenance of species diversity. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 31, 343–366 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Warner, R. R. & Chesson, P. L. Coexistence mediated by recruitment fluctuations: a field guide to the storage effect. Am. Nat. 125, 769–787 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Herms, D. A. & Mattson, W. J. The dilemma of plants: to grow or defend. Q. Rev. Biol. 67, 283–335 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Harvey, P. H. & Pagel, M. D. The Comparative Method in Evolutionary Biology (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 1991)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Harvey, P. H. Phylogenies for ecologists: the 1995 Tansley Lecture. J. Anim. Ecol. 65, 255–263 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Pagel, M. D. A method for the analysis of comparative data. J. Theor. Biol. 156, 431–442 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Siegal, S. Nonparametric Statistics (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1956)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Condit, R., Sukumar, R., Hubbell, S. P. & Foster, R. B. Predicting population trends from size distributions: a direct test in a tropical community. Am. Nat. 152, 495–509 (1998)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Chesson, P. Multispecies competition in variable environments. Theor. Popul. Biol. 45, 227–276 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. MacArthur, R. H. On the relative abundance of bird species. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 43, 293–295 (1957)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Woodward, F. I. & Kelly, C. K. in Plant Functional Types (eds Smith, T. M., Shugart, H. H. & Woodward, F. I.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1997)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Rees, M., Condit, R., Crawley, M., Pacala, S. & Tilman, D. Long-term studies of vegetation dynamics. Science 293, 650–655 (2001)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Lott, E. J. Annotated checklist of the vascular plants of the Chamela Bay region, Jalisco, México. Occas. Pap. Calif. Acad. Sci. 148, 1–60 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Rzedowski, J. Vegetación de México (Limusa, México DF, México, 1978)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Lusk, C. H. & Smith, B. Life history differences and tree species coexistence in an old-growth New Zealand rain forest. Ecology 79, 795–806 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Becerra, J. X. & Venable, D. L. Nuclear ribosomal DNA phylogeny and its implications for evolutionary trends in Mexican Bursera (Burseraceae). Am. J. Bot. 86, 1047–1057 (1999)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank F. I. Woodward, P. Doncaster, P. Harvey, M. Fenner and P. Chesson for comments. This work was supported by grants to C.K.K. from the US-Mexico Foundation for Science, the Earthwatch Foundation and the National Geographic Society. C.K.K. thanks Merton College for a visiting research fellowship during the initiation of this project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Colleen K. Kelly.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kelly, C., Bowler, M. Coexistence and relative abundance in forest trees. Nature 417, 437–440 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1038/417437a

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/417437a

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing