Ground-based observations have shown that Jupiter is a two-component source of microwave radio emission1: thermal atmospheric emission and synchrotron emission2 from energetic electrons spiralling in Jupiter's magnetic field. Later in situ measurements3,4 confirmed the existence of Jupiter's high-energy electron-radiation belts, with evidence for electrons at energies up to 20 MeV. Although most radiation belt models predict electrons at higher energies5,6, adiabatic diffusion theory can account only for energies up to around 20 MeV. Unambiguous evidence for more energetic electrons is lacking. Here we report observations of 13.8 GHz synchrotron emission that confirm the presence of electrons with energies up to 50 MeV; the data were collected during the Cassini fly-by of Jupiter. These energetic electrons may be repeatedly accelerated through an interaction with plasma waves, which can transfer energy into the electrons. Preliminary comparison of our data with model results suggests that electrons with energies of less than 20 MeV are more numerous than previously believed.
On 2–3 January 2001, en route to Saturn, measurements of Jupiter's synchrotron emission were successfully carried out using the radiometer subsystem of the Cassini radar instrument7 operating at 2.2 cm (13.8 GHz). Synchrotron radiation is the relativistic counterpart to cyclotron radiation (the emission originates from the gyration motion of trapped electrons). Relativistic effects cause the continuum emission to be radiated in a narrow beam focused in the direction of the electron's motion. The spectrum of synchrotron radiation is characterized by a well defined peak frequency that depends on both electron energy and magnetic field magnitude. Observations at different frequencies (assuming equivalent magnetic field magnitude) relate to emission from electrons at different energies; however, owing to confusion with thermal emission, ground-based telescopes have difficulty observing synchrotron emission at frequencies higher than ∼5 GHz. Cassini's proximity to Jupiter and the excellent sensitivity of the radar instrument offered an opportunity to map and accurately measure Jupiter's synchrotron emission at a higher frequency than is possible with ground-based telescopes. The motivation was to constrain the high end of the energy spectrum of the electrons trapped in Jupiter's radiation belts. Simultaneous ground-based observations at a wide range of frequencies were carried out to obtain data corresponding to emission from ∼5 MeV to >50 MeV electrons. Interferometric maps were obtained with the Very Large Array (VLA) operating at 20 cm (1,400 MHz) and 90 cm (333 MHz). Single-dish total flux density measurements were obtained with the Deep Space Network (DSN) operating at 2.2, 3.5 and 13 cm wavelengths (2.2 and 3.5 cm were used for thermal emission calibration only).
The narrow beaming of the synchrotron emission couples with the non-symmetrical magnetic field and the electron pitch angle distribution to produce variations as Jupiter rotates (the beaming curve). These variations can be seen in the Cassini polarization maps shown in Fig. 1. Cassini unambiguously detected synchrotron emission at a level of 0.44 ± 0.15 Jy (jansky; total integrated flux density adjusted to 4.04 AU). The synchrotron emission was observed to be approximately 1% of the measured thermal emission from Jupiter's disk. The level of synchrotron emission measured was less than estimated from simulations using the energy spectrum and the spatial distribution from current models5,6. The results demonstrate the existence of ultra-relativistic electrons near Jupiter and extend the measured nonthermal radio spectrum, providing a new constraint for models of Jupiter's radiation belts.
Observations with the VLA were carried out on 3 January 2001 when Earth was at a jovian declination of ∼3 degrees. Figure 2 shows the VLA maps at 20 and 90 cm as a function of central meridian longitude. The total synchrotron emission measured was 5.15 ± 0.7 Jy at 90 cm (with this configuration the VLA cannot accurately measure the total flux at 20 cm). All four Stokes parameters were measured, although here we present only the images of total intensity, converted to brightness temperature. Observations from the DSN antennas in collaboration with the Goldstone–Apple Valley radio telescope (GAVRT) were obtained from November 2000 to March 2001. The GAVRT project also provided an opportunity for students to work with Cassini scientists, conducting ground-based observations and data analysis. Results from the DSN–GAVRT programme are shown in Fig. 3. The interpolated value of the synchrotron flux density on 3 January was 4.02 ±0.08 Jy. Short-term variations at the 10% level are evident in the data set.
The new synchrotron emission radio spectrum data is shown in Fig. 4. Data from an earlier epoch at one additional wavelength8 is shown for completeness. At a frequency of 13.8 GHz (2.2 cm), the region of peak radio emission seen in the maps of Fig. 1 correspond to an average electron energy of ∼50 MeV gyrating in a background magnetic field of approximately ∼1.2 G (gauss). The VLA maps at 1.4 GHz and 333 MHz show regions of peak emission corresponding to average electron energies of ∼15 MeV and ∼7 MeV, respectively, in a ∼1.2-G magnetic field. Because synchrotron radiation is emitted as a continuum, a wide range of electron energies contribute to the maps at each frequency and detailed modelling is required to estimate accurately the electron energy spectrum from the full set of multi-frequency observations. Figure 1 shows significant emission at radial distances >2 RJ, suggesting much higher energy electrons (∼100 MeV) at the larger radial distances. At a subset of central meridian longitudes, a double radiation belt is possibly indicated with the outer belt located just outside of Jupiter's main ring near ∼1.8 RJ, indicative of electron absorption by ring material.
The softer energy spectrum implied by the Cassini high-frequency observations indicates fewer ultra-relativistic electrons (∼50 MeV) than predicted by current radiation-belt models. Current models of Jupiter's radiation belts use electron energy spectra based on in situ data from spacecraft (Pioneer3 and Galileo probe4) and ground-based synchrotron observations. Although the in situ measurements suggested the existence of electrons greater than 20 MeV, the measurements lacked sufficient energy resolution to constrain the energy spectrum at high energies. Simulations of synchrotron emission using the Cassini-derived softer energy spectrum failed to match the intensity level of the lower range of frequencies observed. The preliminary modelling analysis suggests that both a softer energy spectrum and an increase in the number of electrons below 20 MeV are required to match the synchrotron emission spectrum in Fig. 4. The results suggest that the models of Jupiter's radiation belts5 will probably require more modifications than were previously recommended9 to estimate accurately the hazards to spacecraft venturing close to Jupiter.
The results reported here have direct effects on our understanding of Jupiter's radiation belts. The detection of synchrotron emission at 13.8 GHz implies that a steady source of ∼50 MeV electrons must exist. This challenges current theories that have difficulty identifying a source even for the ∼20-MeV electrons that are known to exist from previous observations. Secondly, the DSN–GAVRT 13-cm result confirms that the synchrotron emission can vary on relatively short timescales (days), which implies the existence of a process that can rapidly affect the distribution or number of ∼20-MeV electrons trapped in Jupiter's strong magnetic field.
The most widely accepted theory postulates that the relativistic electrons originate in the solar wind or in the outer jovian magnetosphere and diffuse inward, gaining energy through conservation of the first and second adiabatic invariants10,11,12. This can account for ∼10-MeV electrons near the peak of the synchrotron zone. However, additional acceleration mechanisms are required to explain higher energies. Efforts to model radial diffusion at Jupiter have failed to reproduce accurately a synchrotron emission radio spectrum12. Additional sources of electron energization that are known to occur in the Earth's magnetosphere include local stochastic acceleration by wave–particle interactions13,14, and acceleration by field-aligned potentials in the auroral zone15. Intense wave activity may also be responsible for rapid time variations in synchrotron emission16. Alternative mechanisms, which combine radial diffusive transport with wave–particle interactions, such as recycling and magnetic pumping17,18,19,20, have also been proposed. Interaction between a very fast interplanetary shock and the Earth's magnetosphere has been proposed as a source of drift resonance acceleration to explain the sudden appearance of relativistic electrons in the terrestrial ‘Van Allen’ radiation belts21. A similar process could exist at Jupiter, although analogies between the terrestrial and jovian magnetosphere are not always appropriate.
Thus, the inner radiation belts of Jupiter and Earth both contain extremely high-energy electrons that require substantial acceleration by processes other than adiabatic radial diffusion. These two magnetospheres are arguably the most explored examples of planetary magnetospheres in the Solar System and in many ways represent the archetype for magnetospheric physics. The fact that both magnetospheres contain electrons that require acceleration processes beyond radial diffusion suggests that this may be a fundamental property of all magnetospheres. This implies that our theoretical understanding of the global properties of magnetospheres may need revision and that the importance of local acceleration mechanisms may currently be underestimated.
Burke, B. F. & Franklin, K. L. Observations of a variable radio source associated with the planet Jupiter. J. Geophys. Res. 60, 213–215 (1955).
Berge, G. L. & Gulkis, S. in Jupiter (ed. Gehrels, T.) 621–692 (Univ. Arizona Press, Tucson, 1976).
Van Allen, J. A., Baker, D. N., Randall, B. A. & Sentman, D. D. Pioneer 11 observations of energetic particles in the Jovian magnetosphere. Science 188, 459–462 (1975).
Fischer, H. M., Pehlke, E., Wibberenz, G., Lanzerotti, L. J. & Mihalov, J. D. High-energy charged particles in the inner Jovian magnetosphere. Science 272, 856–858 (1996).
Divine, N. & Garrett, H. B. Charged particle distribution in Jupiter's magnetosphere. J. Geophys. Res. 88, 6889–6903 (1983).
Levin, S. M. et al. Modeling Jupiter's synchrotron radiation. Geophys. Res. Lett. 28, 903–906 (2001).
Elachi, C. et al. RADAR: The Cassini Titan radar mapper. Space Sci. Rev. (in the press).
Bird, M. K., Funke, O., Neidhofer, J. & De Pater, I. Multi-frequency radio observations of Jupiter at Effelsberg during the SL9 impact. Icarus 121, 450–456 (1996).
Bolton, S. J. et al. Divine-Garrett model and Jovian synchrotron emission. Geophys. Res. Lett. 28, 907–910 (2001).
Coroniti, F. V. in The Magnetospheres of Earth and Jupiter (ed. Formisano, V.) 391–410 (Reidel, Dordrecht, 1975).
Bolton, S. J., Gulkis, S., Klein, M. J., de Pater, I. & Thompson, T. J. Correlation studies between solar wind parameters and the decimetric radio emission from Jupiter. J. Geophys. Res. 94, 121–128 (1989).
de Pater, I. & Goertz, C. K. Radial diffusion models of energetic electrons and Jupiter's synchrotron radiation 1. Steady state solution. J. Geophys. Res. 95, 39–50 (1990).
Summers, D., Thorne, R. & Xiao, F. Relativistic theory of wave-particle resonant diffusion with application to electron acceleration in the magnetosphere. J. Geophys. Res. 103, 20487–20500 (1998).
Summers, D., Thorne, R. M. & Xiao, F. Gyroresonant acceleration of electrons in the magnetosphere by superluminous electromagnetic waves. J. Geophys. Res. 106, 10853–10868 (2001).
Carlson, C. W. et al. FAST observations in the downward auroral current region, energetic upgoing electron beams, parallel potential drops, and ion heating. Geophys. Res. Lett. 25, 2017–2021 (1998).
Bolton, S. J. & Thorne, R. M. Assessment of mechanisms for Jovian synchrotron variability associated with comet SL9. Geophys. Res. Lett. 22, 13–16 (1995).
Fujimoto, M. & Nishida, A. Monte Carlo simulation of the energization of Jovian trapped electrons by recirculation. J. Geophys. Res. 95, 3841–3854 (1990).
Nishida, A. Outward diffusion of energetic particles from the Jovian radiation belt. Geophys. Res. Lett. 81, 1771–1773 (1976).
Sentman, D. D., Van Allen, J. A. & Goertz, C. K. Recirculation of energetic particles in Jupiter's magnetosphere. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2, 465–468 (1975).
Goertz, C. K. Energization of charged particles in Jupiter's outer magnetosphere. J. Geophys. Res. 83, 3145–3150 (1978).
Li, X. et al. Simulation of the prompt energization and transport of radiation belt particles during the March 24, 1991, SSC. Geophys. Res. Lett. 20, 2423–2426 (1993).
Klein, M. J., Thompson, T. J. & Bolton, S. J. in Time Variable Phenomena in the Jovian System (ed. Belton, M. J. S.) 151–155 (NASA Spec. Publ. 494, Lowell observatory, 1989).
Klein, M. J., Gulkis, S. & Bolton, S. J. in Planetary Radio Emissions IV (eds Rucker, H. O., Bauer, S. J. & Lecacheux, A.) 217–224 (Austrian Academy of Sciences Press, Vienna, 1996).
Galopeau, P. H. M., Gerard, E. & Lecacheux, A. Modifications of the synchrotron radiation belts of Jupiter: evidence for natural variations in addition to SL9 effects. Planet. Space Sci. 45, 1197–1202 (1997).
Miyoshi, Y. et al. Observation of short-term variation of Jupiter's synchrotron radiation. Geophys. Res. Lett. 26, 9–13 (1999).
We thank the Cassini Radar team, the Cassini Operations team, C. Hansen and J. Gross. The research reported in this paper was performed at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
About this article
Cite this article
Bolton, S., Janssen, M., Thorne, R. et al. Ultra-relativistic electrons in Jupiter's radiation belts. Nature 415, 987–991 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1038/415987a
Radio Science (2020)
A re-analysis of the Jovian radio emission as seen by Cassini-RADAR and evidence for time variability
Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan (2019)
Journal of Materials Science (2019)
IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science (2019)