Abstract
The most important issue in the dating of the long Baikal core (600 m) is whether the segment between the base of C3An.2n and the top of C3Bn (267.67–375.48 m) is distorted. Changes in γ-ray intensity (H. Tsukahara et al., personal communication), which reflects the structure of the cores, indicate that this part is different from the rest (strictly speaking, the upper and lower shifting points seem to be at around 262 m and 362 m, respectively, from the fluctuation). To investigate this difference, we carried out spectral analyses of the upper section of the core (163–261 m), and of the middle (263–361 m) and lower (363–673 m) parts. Prevailing periods for each part are different, particularly in the middle one. There is a distinct common prevailing period of around 4.5–4.9 m in the upper and lower parts, whereas a period of 18 m prevails in the middle part, suggesting that the structure of the middle is different from the upper and lower parts of the core.
Similar content being viewed by others
Kashiwaya et al. reply
We are therefore reluctant to propose an age model that includes the middle part without further information on this section. Another recent age model1 omits any discussion of this point, although the structure cannot be explained without further information.
References
Antipin, V. et al. Quat. Int. 80–81, 19–36 (2001).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
brief communications is intended to provide a forum for both brief, topical reports of general scientific interest and technical discussion of recently published material of particular interest to non-specialist readers. Priority will be given to contributions that have fewer than 500 words, 10 references and only one figure. Detailed guidelines are available on Nature's website (http://www.nature.com) or on request from nature@nature.com
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kashiwaya, K., Ochiai, S., Sakai, H. et al. Age of long sediment cores from Lake Baikal. Nature 415, 976 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1038/415976b
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/415976b
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.