The fate of carbon in grasslands under carbon dioxide enrichment

Abstract

The concentration of carbon dioxide (CO2) in the Earth's atmosphere is rising rapidly1, with the potential to alter many ecosystem processes. Elevated CO2 often stimulates photosynthesis2, creating the possibility that the terrestrial biosphere will sequester carbon in response to rising atmospheric CO2 concentration, partly offsetting emissions from fossil-fuel combustion, cement manufacture, and deforestation3,4. However, the responses of intact ecosystems to elevated CO2 concentration, particularly the below-ground responses, are not well understood. Here we present an annual budget focusing on below-ground carbon cycling for two grassland ecosystems exposed to elevated CO2 concentrations. Three years of experimental CO2 doubling increased ecosystem carbon uptake, but greatly increased carbon partitioning to rapidly cycling carbon pools below ground. This provides an explanation for the imbalance observed in numerous CO2 experiments, where the carbon increment from increased photosynthesis is greater than the increments in ecosystem carbon stocks. The shift in ecosystem carbon partitioning suggests that elevated CO2 concentration causes a greater increase in carbon cycling than in carbon storage in grasslands.

Main

In most ecosystems, leaf and canopy gas-exchange measurements indicate that there is increased carbon uptake in response to experimental doubling of CO2 concentration5,6. However, increased carbon uptake in these one- to ten-year experiments does not necessarily indicate a large potential for carbon storage over 50–100 years, the predicted timescale of atmospheric CO2 doubling7. Ecosystem sequestration of carbon over 50–100 years requires delivery of the extra carbon to large pools with slow turnover (wood and soil organic matter)8. However, net gas-exchange measurements do not reveal whether the extra carbon fixed in response to elevated CO2 is distributed to these pools. The partitioning of this extra carbon among pools with varying turnover times is a critical controller of the potential for terrestrial ecosystems to increase long-term carbon storage.

A consequence of CO2-stimulated plant growth may be an increased demand for below-ground resources (water and mineral nutrients). If the demands for below-ground resources are not met by increased resource availability or efficiency of resource use9,10, or if growth potential is constrained11, plants may increase their loss of carbon through root turnover, respiration or exudation. Carbon allocation to these rapid-turnover pools limits the quantity of long-term carbon storage in response to elevated CO2 because most of the carbon is quickly returned to the atmosphere as CO2 (refs 12, 13). Many studies have documented changes in the root biomass of plants grown under elevated CO2 (refs 14, 15), but root turnover, exudation and respiration are difficult to quantify directly for budgets of total carbon partitioning to roots16. We have used two indirect approaches to assess carbon partitioning to roots. First, we used a mass balance model to describe the carbon stocks, partitioning and annual carbon fluxes in two annual grasslands in California after three years of exposure to elevated CO2. Second, we used isotope labelling of reconstructed ecosystems exposed to elevated CO2 to measure the partitioning of below-ground carbon fluxes.

Our field experimental system consists of naturally occurring annual grasslands in central coastal California, growing on serpentine- and sandstone-derived soils at the Jasper Ridge biological preserve of Stanford University, California (37 ° 24′ N, 122 ° 14′ W; elevation 150 m). The climate is Mediterranean-type, with a winter rainy season and a summer drought. The serpentine and sandstone grasslands occur adjacent to one another but differ dramatically in species composition and productivity. Introduced European annual grasses are the dominant plants on the moderately productive sandstone, whereas native forbs are dominant on the less productive serpentine grassland17,18.

On each grassland, open-top chambers maintain ten ambient and ten elevated (ambient + 360 p.p.m.) CO2-treated plots18,19. We focus on results from the third growing season (1994) after establishing the CO2 manipulation. Live shoot, live root, surface detritus, buried detritus, soil microbial and soil carbon pools were measured by destructive harvest when plants were approaching their maximum biomass during the 1994 growing season. We determined the effect of elevated CO2 on total ecosystem carbon uptake by comparing carbon stocks in the ambient and elevated CO2 treatments. We combined these measurements of carbon stocks with the annual carbon flux in below-ground respiration to calculate carbon partitioning to labile fractions below ground by mass balance. We also determined rates of carbon input to soil by using the 13C-depleted isotopic signature of the CO2 added to the enriched plots. The added CO2 is depleted in 13C (δ13C −35‰ versus δ13C −8‰ for atmospheric CO2) because it is derived from fossil fuel. We quantified short-term carbon partitioning in below-ground respiration in a separate experiment using a 13CO2 pulse label in these grassland communities grown in outdoor microcosms18. By monitoring the rate and δ13C of CO2 released from the soil, we could distinguish CO2 produced from root and heterotrophic sources.

In the field experiment, elevated CO2 significantly increased carbon pools in roots, surface detritus, and soil microorganisms in the sandstone grassland, and there was a 37% increase in the totalamount of carbon in these carbon pools (Fig. 1 and Table 1). Similarly, although roots were the only carbon pool (when analysed separately) to increase significantly under elevated CO2 in the serpentine grassland (Fig. 1; one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) P = 0.048), the sum of plant, detrital and microbial carbon pools increased by 25% in the serpentine grassland (Table 1). Increases in these rapidly cycling carbon pools on both grasslands (two-way ANOVA, P = 0.002) resulted in an increase in total ecosystem carbon (Table 1; two-way ANOVA, P = 0.056), even though soil carbon did not change (two-way ANOVA, P = 0.30)20.

Figure 1
figure1

Carbon pools (g C m−2, mean ± s.e.) at peak biomass in 1994 for sandstone (a) and serpentine (b) grasslands in ambient (open bars) and elevated (filled bars) CO2.

Table 1 Ecosystem carbon stocks

Significant changes in the large pool of total soil carbon (2,111 and 2,311 g C m−2 for the serpentine and sandstone grasslands, respectively) are difficult to detect over the short time course of this experiment (discussed in detail in ref. 20). As expected, the δ13C of soil carbon was lower in elevated compared to ambient CO2 (Fig. 2), owing to the incorporation in elevated CO2 of 266 and 303 g C m−2 of the fossil-fuel-derived (13C-depleted) carbon into the serpentine and sandstone soils (0–15 cm depth), respectively, after four years20. These are substantial amounts of carbon, but they represent only 13% of the soil organic carbon pool. Small increases in soil carbon can, however, lead to large increases in soil respiration if the carbon is delivered to one or more highly labile fractions in the soil21.

Figure 2: Soil δ13C (0–15 cm) as a function of time.
figure2

Soil sampling and δ13C analyses are described in detail in ref. 20. Values shown are mean ± s.e. for ambient (open squares) and elevated (filled squares) CO2 treatments on the sandstone, and ambient (open circles) and elevated (filled circles) CO2 treatments on the serpentine grasslands. δ13C declines in elevated CO2 owing to the incorporation into soil of the 13C-depleted CO2 added to these plots. Rates of carbon flux to soil were quire similar in the two grasslands, despite the two-fold greater above-ground productivity in the sandstone, underscoring the higher relative below-ground allocation in the serpentine grassland22.

The small stature and annual turnover of plants in these grasslands make it possible to calculate carbon allocation to labile fractions below ground by mass balance. Annual litter input to soil, excluding root exudation and turnover, can be determined as above-ground plant production plus standing root mass. Below-ground respiration includes total carbon lost through decomposition of soil organic matter and root respiration. We measured above-ground plant production, peak-season root mass, and the annual loss of carbon through below-ground respiration (measured repeatedly throughout the year in the sandstone grassland and integrated to an annual flux, as described in ref. 22). From these measurements we calculated the annual carbon input by roots, which is the sum of root respiration, intra-annual root turnover, and root exudation: RR + T + E = BR + Cacc − (ANPP + RB), where RR, T and E are root respiration, turnover and exudation, BR is carbon loss through below-ground respiration, Cacc is net carbon accumulation in detritus and soil, ANPP is above-ground plant production, and RB is peak-season root mass23. By measuring RB, we can distinguish carbon allocation to standing root mass from allocation to root respiration, turnover and exudation. We assessed changes in Cacc caused by elevated CO2 as the difference between the two treatments (paired by block) in litter and soil pools under ambient and elevated CO2, thereby avoiding the equilibrium assumption in the model of ref. 23.

Elevated CO2 increased below-ground respiration in the sandstone and serpentine grasslands (Figs 3 , 4)22. By the mass-balance calculation, elevated CO2 increased root respiration, turnover and exudation by 56% in the sandstone grassland (Fig. 3), substantially more than the 25% increase in root biomass. Independent measurements using minirhizotron imaging and in-growth cores in the sandstone grassland show an increase of 0–15% in root turnover in response to elevated CO2 (ref. 24), considerably less than the 56% increase in the sum of root respiration, turnover and exudation shown here, suggesting that root respiration and exudation increase disproportionately. The isotope experiment supported this idea, showing increased root respiration (Fig. 4a; one-way ANOVA, P < 0.001) and heterotrophic respiration (Fig. 4b; two-way ANOVA, P = 0.004), the latter resulting primarily from increased oxidation of carbon derived from roots (Fig. 4c; two-way ANOVA, P = 0.038). This was especially pronounced under nutrient enrichment, which increased above-ground productivity in these microcosms to levels typical of the sandstone grassland25.

Figure 3: Annual carbon fluxes in g C m−2 yr−1 for 1994 in the sandstone grassland in ambient (white boxes) and elevated (black boxes) CO2.
figure3

Spot measurements in the field experiment and measurements over a 7-month period in the microcosm experiments show that the CO2 stimulation of below-ground respiration in the serpentine is similar to that observed in the sandstone grassland22 (measurements in the field were too infrequent to calculate the annual flux in the serpentine).

Figure 4: Partitioning below-ground respiration using the 13C isotope tracer in the microcosm experiment.
figure4

Values are mean + s.e. for ambient (open bars) and elevated (filled bars) CO2 (n = 6–7). Note the changes in scale for the different graphs. a, Root respiration rates for the unfertilized treatment only, determined either by difference or by isotope. b, Heterotrophic (soil microbial) respiration rates determined by laboratory incubations of root-free soil. c, The heterotrophic respiratory flux associated with the decomposition of rhizodeposited substrates. d, The heterotrophic respiratory flux associated with decomposition of above- and below-ground litter produced during the previous growing season.

These findings indicate that elevated CO2 enhances carbon partitioning to roots, a prediction that has not received wide support by studies measuring standing root biomass14,15,16. Our results indicate that this shift in partitioning manifests primarily as increased root exudation and respiration, and is thus extremely difficult to detect, providing a possible explanation for the difficulty in accounting for all the additional carbon fixed under elevated CO2 (refs 6, 26). All of the carbon allocated to root respiration is immediately returned to the atmosphere as CO2. The carbon allocated to exudation is distributed between microbial respiration and labile soil carbon27. Carbon additions to labile pools in the soil can drive substantial but difficult to measure sequestration of carbon in the short term21. The small size and high turnover of the labile pools, however, prevents them from providing quantitatively important long-term carbon storage. Only a small portion of the labile carbon added to soil through exudation can become stabilized in soil organic matter through interactions with clays; exudates will not remain in soil owing to their chemical nature, in contrast to other more recalcitrant plant carbon constituents, such as lignin and cellulose, which may persist in soil for many years27,28. Thus, compared with similar carbon additions through increased plant litter production, increased root exudation may cause relatively small increases in the carbon content of soil.

Our measurements are consistent with modelling studies that predict increased carbon uptake by grassland vegetation in response to elevated CO2 (ref. 29), and with experimental results from tall-grass prairie where elevated CO2 increased carbon uptake over a 34-day period30. Our data provide further experimental support for increased grassland carbon uptake in response to elevated CO2. Yet the distribution of the extra carbon, particularly the increase in carbon allocation to labile pools below ground, suggests that the net carbon balance obtained in short-term CO2-enrichment experiments tend to overestimate the potential for grasslands to sequester carbon in soils in the long term.

Methods

Field experiment. Circular open-top chambers (0.65 m in diameter and 1 m tall) were established in each grassland in January 1992. A blower forces ambient air (either unsupplemented or with additional CO2) into the lower portion of each chamber and out of the open top at a rate of 0.08 m3 s−1, maintaining CO2 concentrations of approximately 720 p.p.m. in the elevated treatment (for more details see refs 18, 19). Live shoot and surface litter mass were determined by harvesting a circular area (10-cm diameter) from each plot as described18 on 5 April 1994 in the serpentine and 4 May 1994 in the sandstone grassland. At the same time, 5-cm diameter by 15-cm deep cores were removed from each plot. Roots and detritus were removed from a subsample of the core by sieving (0.5 mm) followed by hand separation under a dissecting microscope; this cleaned soil was used to assess total soil and soil microbial carbon content. Roots and buried detritus (dead plant fragments, identified by colour) were recovered by washing the remainder of the soil core. Root, detrital and soil carbon content were determined by combustion/gas chromatography (Europea Scientific); combustion/gas chromatographic determinations of shoot carbon content values from the peak biomass harvest in 1992 were used to calculate shoot carbon pools. Microbial carbon content was determined by chloroform fumigation.

Microcosm experiment. Seeds of plants representative of the serpentine and sandstone grassland communities were planted in 0.4-m diameter tubes with a 0.95-m deep column of serpentine soil in September–October 1992 and grown in open-top enclosures supplied with ambient (360 p.p.m.) or elevated (720 p.p.m.) CO2. By the second growing season, all were similar in plant species composition and ecosystem properties, and so are combined for presentation and analysis. Nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium (20 g m−2) were supplied once each season as a slow-release fertilizer to half of the tubes in a factorial design. In mid-March 1993, a subset of the tubes was pulse labelled by closing the chambers and supplying 1 litre of 99% 13CO2 to the chamber atmosphere during a 5-h period (8:00 to 13:00). At the height of flowering thefollowing year (18–20 April 1994), we determined the δ13C of soil CO2 (13CO2 BR) collected from perforated stainless steel tubes inserted into the soil (0–15 cm depth) and the amount and δ13C of CO2 produced by soil heterotrophs during 96-h laboratory incubations of root-free soil (13CO2 HR). We assumed that root δ13C was the same as the δ13C of CO2 produced by root respiration (13CO2 RR) and calculated the proportional contributions from roots (y) and soil heterotrophs (1 − y) to below-ground respiration: 13CO2 BR = y (13CO2 RR) + (1 − y)(13CO2 HR). We also calculated root respiration by difference, as below-ground respiration rates22 minus CO2 production rates in the soil incubations. The 13C signal associated with the CO2 enrichment of the atmosphere and the pulse label allowed us further to partition the heterotrophic respiration flux into three components. The soil organic carbon (SOC) contribution to heterotrophic respiration (HR) was calculated using the elevated CO2 treatment with no pulse label, where x is the proportional contribution of SOC to HR: 13CO2 HR = x (13C SOC) + (1 − x)(13C plant). Rhizodeposition and previous year's litter contributions to HR were calculated using ambient and elevated CO2 treatments that had been pulse labelled, where y is the proportional contribution of rhizodeposition to HR and x is from above: 13CO2 HR = x (13C SOC) + y(13C rhizodeposition) + (1 − xy) (13C litter).

References

  1. 1

    Schimel, D.et al. in Climate Change 1995: The Science of Climate Change(eds Houghton, J. T. et al.) 65–131 (Cambridge Univ. Press, (1996)).

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Long, S. P. & Drake, B. G. in Topics in Photosynthesis(eds Baker, N. R. & Thomas, H.) 69–107 (Elsevier, Amsterdam, (1992)).

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Broecker, W. S., Takahashi, T., Simpson, H. J. & Peng, T. H. Fate of fossil fuel carbon dioxide and the global carbon budget. Science 206, 409–418 (1979).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Gifford, R. M. Carbon dioxide and plant growth under water and light stress, implications for balancing the global carbon budget. Search 10, 316–318 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Drake, B. G. & Leadley, P. W. Canopy photosynthesis of crops and native plants exposed to long-term elevated CO2: commissioned review. Plant Cell Env. 14, 853–860 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Canadell, J. G., Pitelka, L. F. & Ingram, J. S. I. The effects of elevated CO2on plant-soil carbon below ground: a synthesis. Plant Soil 187, 391–400 (1996).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Schimel, D. S. Terrestrial ecosystems and the carbon cycle. Global Change Biol. 1, 77–91 (1995).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Harrison, K., Broecker, W. & Bonani, G. Astrategy for estimating the impact of CO2 fertilisation on soil carbon storage. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 7, 69–80 (1993).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Hilbert, D. W., Larigauderie, A. & Reynolds, J. F. The influence of carbon dioxide and daily photon-flux density on optimal leaf nitrogen concentration and root:shoot ratio. Ann. Bot. 68, 365–376 (1991).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Luo, Y., Field, C. B. & Mooney, H. A. Predicting responses of photosynthesis and root fraction to elevated CO2: Interactions among carbon, nitrogen, and growth. Plant Cell Env. 17, 1195–1204 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Field, C. B., Chapin, F. S. II, Matson, P. A. & Mooney, H. A. Responses of terrestrial ecosystems to the changing atmosphere: A resource-based approach. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 23, 201–235 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    van Veen, J. A., Liljeroth, E. L., Lekkerkerk, J. A. & van de Geijn, S. C. Carbon fluxes in plant-soil systems at elevated atmospheric CO2 levels. Ecol. Appl. 2, 175–181 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    van de Geijn, S. C. & van Veen, J. A. Implications of increased carbon dioxide levels for carbon input and turnover in soils. Vegetatio 104/105, 283–292 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Stulen, I. & den Hertog, J. Root growth and functioning under atmospheric CO2 enrichment. Vegetatio 104/105, 99–115 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Rogers, H. H., Runion, G. B. & Krupa, S. V. Plant responses to atmospheric CO2 enrichment with emphasis on roots and the rhizosphere. Env. Pollut. 83, 155–189 (1994).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Norby, R. J. Issues and perspectives for investigating root responses to elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide. Plant Soil 165, 9–20 (1994).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Hickman, J. C. The Jepson Manual: Higher Plants of California(Univ. California Press, Berkeley, (1993)).

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    Field, C. B., Chapin, F. S. II, Chiariello, N. R., Holland, E. A. & Mooney, H. A. in Carbon Dioxide and Terrestrial Ecosystems(eds Koch, G. W. & Mooney, H. A.) 121–145 (Academic, Sand Diego, (1996)).

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    Jackson, R. B., Sala, O. E., Field, C. B. & Mooney, H. A. CO2 alters water use, carbon gain, and yield for the dominant species in a natural grassland. Oecologia 98, 257–262 (1994).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    Hungate, B. A., Jackson, R. B., Field, C. B. & Chapin, F. S. II Detecting changes in soil carbon in CO2 enrichment experiments. Plant Soil 187, 135–145 (1996).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    Thompson, M. V., Randerson, J. T., Malmström, C. M. & Field, C. B. Change in net primary production and heterotrophic respiration: how much is necessary to sustain the terrestrial sink? Global Biogeochem. Cycles 10, 711–726 (1996).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22

    Luo, Y., Jackson, R. B., Field, C. B. & Mooney, H. A. Elevated CO2 increases belowground respiration in California grasslands. Oecologia 108, 130–137 (1996).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    Raich, J. W. & Nadelhoffer, K. J. Belowground carbon allocation in forest ecosystems: global trends. Ecology 70, 1346–1354 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24

    Higgins, P. A. T. thesis, Stanford Univ. (1996).

  25. 25

    Chiariello, N. R. & Field, C. B. in Community, Population and Evolutionary Responses to Elevated Carbon Dioxide Concentration(eds Körner, C. & Bazzaz, F. A.) 139–175 (Academic, San Diego, (1996)).

    Google Scholar 

  26. 26

    Drake, B. G.et al. Acclimation of photosynthesis, respiration, and ecosystem carbon flux of wetland on Chesapeake Bay, Maryland, to elevated atmospheric CO2 concentrations. Plant Soil 187, 111–118 (1996).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27

    Parton, W. J., Schimel, D. S., Cole, C. V. & Ojima Analysis of factors controlling soil organic matter levels in Great Plains grasslands. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 51, 1173–1179 (1987).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28

    Oades, J. M. The retention of organic matter in soils. Biogeochemistry 5, 35–70 (1988).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29

    Parton, W. J.et al. Impact of climate change on grassland production and soil carbon worldwide. Global Change Biol. 1, 13–22 (1995).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30

    Ham, J. M., Owensby, C. E., Coyne, P. I. & Bremer, D. J. Fluxes of CO2 and water vapor from a prairie ecosystem exposed to ambient and elevated atmospheric CO2. Agric. For. Meteorol. 77, 73–93 (1995).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank N. Chiariello, C. Chu, G. Joel, Y. Luo, B. Mortimer, E. Nelson, J.Randerson, H. Reynolds, J. des Rosier, S. Thayer and J. Whitbeck for contributions to the design and execution of the experiment; H. Whitted for help with experimental design and construction; P. Canadell, Z.Cardon, R. Martin and A. Townsend for assistance and advice with the 13CO2 labelling, sampling and interpretation; J. Sulzman for help with the figures; and D. Schimel for help with the isotope calculations. The Jasper Ridge CO2 experiment is supported by grants from the US NSF to the Carnegie Institution of Washington, Stanford University and the University of California, Berkeley. B.A.H. was supported by a National Defense Science and Engineering graduate fellowship and an NSF doctoral dissertation improvement grant. R.B.J. was supported by a grant from NIGEC/DOE and a DOE distinguished postdoctoral fellowship for global change. The National Center for Atmospheric Research is sponsored by the NSF. This is publication number 1344 from the Carnegie Institution of Washington, Department of Plant Biology.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bruce A. Hungate.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hungate, B., Holland, E., Jackson, R. et al. The fate of carbon in grasslands under carbon dioxide enrichment. Nature 388, 576–579 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1038/41550

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing