Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Brief Communication
  • Published:

Brain evolution (Communications arising)

How did brains evolve?

Abstract

Three reports on mammalian brain evolution1,2,3 analyse the same comparative data on brain component volumes4 but come to partially conflicting conclusions. Clark et al.3 conclude from their analysis of volumetric brain proportions (“cerebro-types”) that cerebellum size is invariant across mammalian taxonomic groups, the neocortex and cerebellum do not co-vary in size (in contradiction to ref. 1), and cerebrotype-based measures identify directional changes in brain architecture. Here I provide evidence that calls each of these conclusions into question. The failure of the cerebrotype measure to identify species differences in brain architecture that are independent of gross brain size undermines the proposal by Clark et al. that it could be useful for detecting evolutionary patterns and phylogenetic relationships.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Correlated variation in the relative size of neocortex and cerebellum.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Barton, R. A. & Harvey, P. H. Nature 405, 1055–1058 (2000).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. De Winter, W. & Oxnard, C. E. Nature 409, 710–714 (2001).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Clark, D. A., Mitra, P. P. & Wang, S.-H. Nature 411, 189–193 (2001).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Stephan, H., Frahm, H. D. & Baron, G. Folia Primatol. 35, 1–29 (1981).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Putnam, I. K. Proc. R. Acad. Amsterdam 31, 155–168 (1927).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Purvis, A. & Rambaut, A. Comp. Appl. Biosci. 11, 247–251 (1995).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Baron, G., Stephan, H. & Frahm, H. D. Comparative Neurobiology in Chiroptera Vol. 1 (Birkhauser, Basel, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Finlay, B. L. & Darlington, R. B. Science 268, 1578–1584 (1995).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert A. Barton.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barton, R. How did brains evolve?. Nature 415, 134–135 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1038/415134a

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/415134a

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing