Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

On/off blinking and switching behaviour of single molecules of green fluorescent protein

Abstract

Optical studies of individual molecules at low and room temperature can provide information about the dynamics of local environments in solids, liquids and biological systems unobscured by ensemble averaging1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14. Here we present a study of the photophysical behaviour of single molecules of the green fluorescent protein (GFP) derived from the jellyfish Aequorea victoria. Wild-type GFP and its mutant have attracted interest as fluorescent biological labels because the fluorophore may be formed in vivo15,16. GFP mutants immobilized in aereated aqueous polymer gels and excited by 488-nm light undergo repeated cycles of fluorescent emission (‘blinking’) on a timescale of several seconds—behaviour that would be unobservable in bulk studies. Eventually the individual GFP molecules reach a long-lasting dark state, from which they can be switched back to the original emissive state by irradiation at 405 nm. This suggests the possibility of using these GFPs as fluorescent markers for time-dependent cell processes, and as molecular photonic switches or optical storage elements, addressable on the single-molecule level.

Main

Wild-type GFP has two absorption maxima—a strong peak at 396 nm, and a weak one at 476 nm (ref. 15)—but only one emission peak at 508 nm, indicating that excited-state relaxation to a common emissive level occurs. The absorption peaks correspond to the neutral and anionic chromophore states, respectively, which can be interconverted by an excited-state proton transfer and spontaneous ground-state processes16,17,18. Ser 65 (serine, S) and Thr 203 (threonine, T) are particularly close to the chromophore19,20 and strongly influence its photophysical properties. Alteration of Ser 65 strongly favours the anionic form (which has a long-wavelength absorption), producing mutants which can easily be pumped with readily available green lasers16,19,20. Aromatic residues phenylalanine (F) and tyrosine (Y) at position 203 further increase the peak excitation wavelength by 13–24 nm, probably by increasing the polarizability around the chromophore through π–π interactions19. Because of the higher brightness compared to wild type, we focus here on two particular yellow-fluorescing GFP mutants, S65G/S72A/T203F (denoted T203F) and S65G/S72A/T203Y (denoted T203Y), which differ only by the presence of a hydroxyl group.

These mutants' long-wavelength absorption and emission properties (Fig. 1) enable facile excitation with an argon-ion laser, while allowing high-efficiency fluorescence collection and background rejection. In the bulk, T203F (Fig. 1a) has a dominant absorption at 510 nm, and a weak peak near 405 nm. Excitation at 488 nm produces long-wavelength emission, whereas excitation at 400 nm gives emission predominantly peaking at 455 nm rather than 525 nm (Fig. 1ainset). By analogy to previously studied mutants, the long-wavelength absorption and emission probably correspond to the anionic form, and the short-wavelength absorption probably arises from a small fraction of molecules with neutral chromophores16,17. In contrast to T203F, T203Y (Fig. 1b) shows much weaker absorption at 400 nm which produces (Fig. 1binset) only weak emission at 470 nm and dominant long-wavelength fluorescence (535 nm). Excitation at 488 nm, however, yields emission nearly identical to that of T203F. The Ser 65 and Thr 203 mutations combine to make the low-energy absorption strongest in both mutants (opposite to wild-type photophysics); however, the emission properties suggest that a larger portion of the neutral form persists in T203F.

Figure 1: Bulk spectra of GFP mutants.
figure1

a, T203F. Main figure: solid line, absorption; dotted line, emission excited by 488-nm irradiation. Inset, emission excited by 400-nm irradiation. b, T203Y. Main figure: solid line, absorption; dotted line, emission excited by 488-nm irradiation. Inset, emission excited by 400-nm irradiation.

Single molecules of T203F (number of molecules, n = 178) and T203Y (n = 199) immobilized in polyacrylamide gels21 were directly imaged by excitation at 488 nm and detection of polarization-dependent emission. During several minutes of illumination, each molecule produced several seconds of fluorescence, then several seconds without emission, followed by resumption of emission, repeating over the course of many minutes. Such high-contrast ‘blinking’ behaviour, which is unobservable in bulk experiments, is reminiscent of spectral and amplitude fluctuations reported previously for single small fluorophores9,10. These GFP mutants, however, show further interesting characteristics. Each GFP molecule generally ended in a non-fluorescent state after emission of 106 photons. This final dark state was found to be long-lived: after 5 min with no pumping, the single molecules remained non-emissive on re-irradiation at 488 nm (Fig. 2, panels 1, 3, 5, 7, 9). The bright state could be reproducibly recovered, however, by irradiation at 405 nm for 5 min before 488-nm re-irradiation (Fig. 2, panels 2, 4, 6, 8, 10), an optically induced switching effect. To our knowledge, these GFP mutants provide the first example of a room-temperature optical switch in which each molecule is individually addressable, readout being accomplished quasi-non-destructively by way of fluorescence (similar to earlier liquid-helium-temperature systems22). The bacteriorhodopsin protein also exhibits room-temperature switching, but it efficiently photoisomerizes without fluorescing23, rendering it inaccessible to single-molecule detection and use.

Figure 2: The switching behaviour of a single T203F molecule, illustrated by a series of ten consecutive experiments on the same molecule.
figure2

Each 100-ms frame shows the emission produced by 488-nm illumination (60 nm × 60 nm pixel size). In odd-numbered frames (1, 3, 5, 7, 9), the sample was pre-illuminated for 90 s at 488 nm to prepare the long-lived dark state, followed by 5 min with no light incident, after which the displayed image was obtained. The dark state was still present in each case. In even-numbered frames (2, 4, 6, 8, 10), the sample was also pre-illuminated for 90 s at 488 nm to prepare the dark state, but then the sample was irradiated for 5 min at 405 nm (1 W cm−2), after which the displayed image was immediately obtained. In each case, the emissive state is restored by the 405-nm irradiation. The odd-numbered cases assess the thermal stability of the dark state, whereas the even-numbered cases determine its photosensitivity to 405-nm irradiation. Similar optical switching behaviour occurred for T203Y.

Many single GFP molecule fluorescence trajectories (Fig. 3a, b) were analysed to develop on-time and off-time histograms commonly used in single-ion-channel recordings24. Only the high-intensity data (2,000 W cm−2), however, produced a sufficient signal-to-noise ratio to reliably distinguish bright and dark by a single threshold. The on-time histograms were fitted by single exponentials (time constants: T203Y 0.86 s (n = 89), T203F 0.71 s (n = 97)). The dark-time histograms, however, showed bi-exponential decays for both mutants with a short decay time of 1 s and a long decay time greater than several tens of seconds (limited by our 90-s data collection time), corresponding to the blinking and switching timescales, respectively.

Figure 3: Traces of typical fluorescence intensity versus time for T203Y (a) and T203F (b) with an excitation intensity of 2,000 W cm−2.
figure3

Each trace covers 16 s. Autocorrelations of the fluorescence trajectories a and b, expanded to illustrate the decay over the first 20 s, are shown in c and d, respectively, with confidence limits.

To obtain more information from fluorescence trajectories at lower intensity, we use autocorrelation analysis, which has helped the understanding of several single-molecule systems14. Typical T203Y and T203F single-molecule autocorrelations are presented with confidence limits in Fig. 3c, d. The autocorrelation time τc(determined from an exponential fit to the autocorrelation decay) reflects the average period of on/off behaviour. Histograms of the τc values from 377 individual GFP molecules are shown in Fig. 4as a function of excitation intensity. Whereas the average autocorrelation time, τcavg, is reduced by only a factor of two for a 20-fold increase in power, the single-molecule measurements produce the entire distribution, providing clear evidence that τc shortens with increased intensity. As the autocorrelation measures how the fluorescence intensity correlates with itself in time, the faster and less power-dependent autocorrelation decays of T203Y relative to those of T203F indicate that the additional hydroxyl group of T203Y facilitates a lower-energy pathway to chromophore activation/inactivation (Fig 5).

Figure 4: Histograms of single-molecule autocorrelation times τc as a function of incident intensity; average autocorrelation times, τcavg, are calculated from the distributions.
figure4

Histograms a, b, c correspond respectively to T203Y at 100 W cm−2cavg= 2.82 ± 0.62 s, n = 36), 500 W cm−2cavg= 2.01 ± 0.36 s, n = 74) and 2,000 W cm−2cavg= 1.61 ± 0.27 s, n = 89). Traces d, e and f were generated from T203F data at respectively 100 W cm−2cavg= 4.78 ± 0.80 s, n = 41), 500 W cm−2cavg= 2.91 ± 0.57 s, n = 40) and 2,000 W cm−2cavg= 1.37 ± 0.27 s, n = 97). Quoted errors correspond to 80% confidence limits.

Figure 5: Schematic diagram of the various states consistent with the experimental observations as described in the text.
figure5

For simplicity, the states are depicted as connected as A↔ I ↔ N, but I↔ A ↔ N is also possible. A* and N* denote excited states of A and N, respectively. See text for definitions of other symbols.

The observed single-molecule dynamics and bulk absorption and emission spectra suggest the model in Fig. 5. Because T203Y and T203F have strong absorption maxima near 513 nm, we define the bright state as the anionic form, A, which absorbs 488-nm excitation and emits photons at 525 nm, and the dark states as those which do not. The blinking indicates that a dark state, I, exists from which spontaneous return to A occurs, although the exact identity of form I is unknown at present. Processes P1 populate the state I, either directly, or as a result of thermally activated barrier-crossing produced by cooling of excited vibrational levels of the electronic ground state. The latter possibility is consistent with the weak power dependences observed in the τc values of both mutants (Fig. 4). In addition, there is another dark state which is eventually reached with lower probability (state N, process P2) and which has a long lifetime (>5 min) in the absence of light. We use “N” for this state as much evidence suggests this to be the neutral form15,16,17,18, and the data in Fig. 1asuggests that the less-polar solvation shell produced with Phe 203 favours this neutral state. The ground-state barriers in both mutants for the transition from state N to state I are large enough to allow ambient stability of state N, consistent with the bi-exponential dark-time distributions. Excitation at 405 nm, however, does regenerate state A, by some third process P3, showing that light-induced conversion from the neutral to the anionic state occurs when higher-energy photons are present. Because the wild-type hydrogen-bonding and chromophore solvation shell are altered in T203Y and T203F, these mutants show distinct, but interconvertible, neutral and anionic states with very different photophysical properties.

These optical transformations of GFPs are likely to be obscured in ensemble-averaged measurements. Continuous monitoring of these immobilized single protein molecules shows that a process, which might be identified as irreversible ‘bleaching’, reverses on illumination at a different wavelength. This controllable photochromism may allow these GFP mutants to be used as caged fluorescent markers to monitor time-dependent cellular processes such as protein diffusion or transport25. Photochromic GFPs could also offer potential advantages in optical information storage26,27 such as high storage densities (1 bit per molecule), photostability even in aereated samples, fluorescent readout, ease of production, known atomic resolution structure, and amenability to optimization by mutagenesis.

Methods

Mutants. GFP was expressed in Escherichia coli using the expression plasmid pRSET (Invitrogen) in which the region encoding GFP was fused in-frame with nucleotides encoding an amino-terminal polyhistidine tag. Sequence changes were introduced by site-directed mutagenesis using the Bio-Rad mutagenesis kit28 and confirmed by sequencing. The recombinant proteins were expressed in the bacterial strain BL21(DE3) after induction with IPTG (0.5 mM) at room temperature and purified by Ni affinity chromatography.

T203F/T203Y imaging. Samples were prepared by the methods of ref. 21 from 10−10 M solutions of protein diluted in 1 mg ml−1BSA. Polyacrylamide gels (T = 15%, C = 5% without SDS) were prepared in pH 7 phosphate-buffered saline doped with protein (here T is the total concentration of monomer in g per 100 ml, C is the wt% of total monomer which is crosslinker, and SDS indicates sodium dodecyl sulphate). The gel host provided pore sizes small enough for convenient (and complete) immobilization of each protein molecule, while maintaining its naturally fluorescent, native conformation21,29. Excitation with a 488-nm laser (100–2,000 W cm−2 at the gel/coverslip interface) occurred in the total-internal-reflection geometry; the emission was imaged with a Nikon inverted microscope (250-nm resolution) with an Omega 535DF55 filter and a Princeton Instruments intensified frame transfer CCD (100 ms time resolution, 90 s collection time). Oxygen was not removed from samples for which data is shown, but samples prepared with 10 min helium bubbling showed similar on/off behaviour. 405-nm irradiation was produced by a Hg arc lamp with line filter through the epi-illumination port (1 W cm−2). The linear increase of detected photons as a function of laser intensity (100–2,000 W cm−2) indicated that saturation and multiphoton processes were negligible in these studies. Typical detected count rates of 5,000–6,000 photons s−1 at 2,000 W cm−2 pumping intensity (150,000 excitations s−1) were achieved, with most of the molecules emitting several millions of photons without irreversible bleaching.

Autocorrelation analysis. We define the autocorrelation function, C(τ), for discrete data points;

where Ī is the average intensity, t is the time summed from 0 to N 100-ms intervals, and I(t) is the time-dependent fluorescence intensity. Confidence limits were generated on the autocorrelations such that any values within the limits were consistent with zero30. Exponential fits of the autocorrelations were generated only for the statistically significant portions of the curves beyond the short time correlation spike arising from band-limited noise.

References

  1. 1

    Moerner, W. E. & Kador, L. Optical detection and spectroscopy of single molecules in a solid. Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 2535–2538 (1989).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Orrit, M. & Bernard, J. Single pentacene molecules detected by fluorescence excitation in a p-terphenyl crystal. Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 2716–2719 (1990).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Reilly, P. D. & Skinner, J. L. Spectral diffusion of single molecule fluorescence: a probe of low-frequency localized excitations in disordered crystals. Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 4257–4260 (1993).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Moerner, W. E. Examining nanoenvironments in solids on the scale of a single, isolated molecule. Science 265, 46–53 (1994).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Barbara, P. F. & Moerner, W. E. (eds Single molecules and atoms. Acc. Chem. Res. 29, (1996).

  6. 6

    Betzig, E. & Chichester, R. J. Single molecules observed by near-field scanning optical microscopy. Science 262, 1422–1428 (1993).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Ambrose, W. P., Goodwin, P. M., Martin, J. C. & Keller, R. A. Alterations of single molecule fluorescence lifetimes in near-field optical microscopy. Science 265, 364–367 (1994).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Nie, S., Chiu, D. T. & Zare, R. N. Probing individual molecules with confocal fluorescence microscopy. Science 266, 1018–1021 (1994).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Trautman, J. K. & Macklin, J. J. Time-resolved spectroscopy of single molecules using near-field and far-field optics. Chem. Phys. 205, 221–229 (1996).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Lu, H. P. & Xie, X. S. Single-molecule spectral fluctuations at room temperature. Nature 385, 143–146 (1997).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Funatsu, T., Harada, Y., Tokunaga, M., Saito, K. & Yanagida, T. Imaging of single fluorescent molecules and individual ATP turnovers by single myosin molecules in aqueous solution. Nature 374, 555–559 (1995).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Vale, R. D. et al. Direct observation of single kinesin molecules moving along microtubules. Nature 380, 451–453 (1996).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Schmidt, T., Schutz, G. J., Baumgartner, W., Gruber, H. J. & Schindler, H. Imaging of single molecule diffusion. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 93, 2926–2929 (1996).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Basché, T., Moerner, W. E., Orrit, M. & Wild, U. P. (eds Single Molecule Optical Detection, Imaging, and Spectroscopy(Verlag-Chemie, Munich, (1997)).

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Heim, R., Prasher, D. C. & Tsien, R. Y. Wavelength mutations and posttranslational autoxidation of green fluorescent protein. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 91, 12501–12504 (1994).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Cubitt, A. B. et al. Understanding, improving and using green fluorescent proteins. Trends Biochem. Sci. 20, 448–455 (1995).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Chattoraj, M., King, B. A., Bublitz, G. U. & Boxer, S. G. Ultra-fast excited state dynamics in green fluorescent protein: Multiple states and protein transfer. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci USA 93, 8362–8367 (1996).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    Brejc, K. et al. Structural basis for dual excitation and photoisomerization of the Aequorea victoria green fluorescent protein. Proc. Natl. Acad. USA 94, 2306–2322 (1997).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    Ormo, M. et al. Crystal structure of the Aequorea victoria green fluorescent protein. Science 273, 1392–1395 (1996).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    Yang, F., Moss, L. G. & Phillips, J. G. N. The molecular structure of green fluorescent protein. Nature Biotechnol. 14, 1246–1251 (1996).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    Dickson, R. M., Norris, D. J., Tzeng, Y. -L. & Moerner, W. E. Three dimensional imaging of single molecules in pores of poly(acrylamide) gels. Science 274, 966–969 (1996).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22

    Moerner, W. E. et al. Optical probing of single molecules of terrylene in a Shpolskii matrix—a two-state single-molecule switch. J. Phys. Chem. 98, 7382–7389 (1994).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    Stuart, J. A., Tallent, J. R., Tan, E. H. L. & Birge, R. R. in Sixth Biennial IEEE Intl Nonvolatile Memory Technol. Conf. Proc. 35–51 (IEEE, Albuquerque, NM, (1996)).

    Google Scholar 

  24. 24

    Sakmann, B. & Neher, E. Single Channel Recording(Plenum, New York, (1995)).

    Google Scholar 

  25. 25

    Yokoe, H. & Meyer, T. Spatial dynamics of GFP-tagged proteins investigated by local fluorescence enhancement. Nature Biotechnol. 14, 1252–1256 (1996).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26

    Irie, M. in Photo-reactive Materials for Ultrahigh Density Optical Memory(ed. Irie, M.) 1–12 (Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, (1994)).

    Google Scholar 

  27. 27

    Parthenopoulos, D. A. & Rentzepis, P. M. Three-dimensional optical storage memory. Science 245, 843–845 (1989).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28

    Kunkel, T. A., Roberts, J. D. & Zakour, R. A. Rapid and efficient site-specific mutagenesis without phenotypic selection. Meth. Enzymol. 154, 367–382 (1987).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29

    Fawcett, J. S. & Morris, C. J. O. R. Molecular-sieve chromatography of proteins on granulated polyacrylamide gels. Separat. Sci. 1, 9–26 (1966).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30

    Box, G. E. P. & Jenkins, G. M. Time Series Analysis Forecasting and Control(Holden-Day, San Francisco, (1970)).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank L. S. B. Goldstein and S. Kummer for discussions. This work was supported by the NSF.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to W. E. Moerner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dickson, R., Cubitt, A., Tsien, R. et al. On/off blinking and switching behaviour of single molecules of green fluorescent protein. Nature 388, 355–358 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1038/41048

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing