Letter | Published:

Extraordinary lifespans in ants: a test of evolutionary theories of ageing

Naturevolume 389pages958960 (1997) | Download Citation

Subjects

Abstract

Senescence presents not only a medical problem, but also an evolutionary paradox because it should be opposed by natural selection. Evolutionary hypotheses propose that ageing evolves as the necessary cost of processes increasing early reproductive success1,2, or because of weaker selection against late-acting mutations3. A prediction of these hypotheses is that the rate of ageing should increase and the average lifespan decrease as therate of extrinsic mortality increases1,2,3,4,5,6,7. Alternatively, non-adaptive, purely mechanistic hypotheses invoke damage to DNA, cells, tissues and organs as being the unique cause of senescence and ineluctable death of organisms8. Here we show that the evolution of eusociality is associated with a 100-fold increase in insect lifespan. Such an increase is predicted by evolutionary theories because termite, bee and ant queens live in colonies that are sheltered and heavily defended against predators. Moreover, a comparison of ants with contrasting life histories also reveals an association between lifespan and extrinsic rate of mortality. Theseresults provide strong support for evolutionary theories of ageing, as purely mechanistic hypotheses of senescence do not propose any association between the rate of extrinsic mortality and lifespans.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1

    Williams, G. C. Pleitropy, natural selection, and the evolution of senescence. Evolution 11, 398–441 (1957).

  2. 2

    Rose, M. Evolutionary Biology of Aging (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, (1991)).

  3. 3

    Hamilton, W. D. The moulding of senescence by natural selection. J. Theor. Biol. 12, 12–45 (1966).

  4. 4

    Stearns, S. C. The Evolution of Life Histories (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, (1992)).

  5. 5

    Partridge, L. & Barton, N. H. Optimality, mutation and the evolution of ageing. Nature 362, 305–311 (1993).

  6. 6

    Partridge, L. & Barton, N. H. On measuring the rate of ageing. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 263, 1365–1371 (1996).

  7. 7

    Charlesworth, B. Evolution in Age-structured Populations2nd edn (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, (1994)).

  8. 8

    Finch, C. E. Longevity, Senescence and the Genome (Chicago Univ. Press, Chicago, (1990)).

  9. 9

    Bell, G. Evolutionary and nonevolutionary theories of senescence. Am. Nat. 124, 600–603 (1984).

  10. 10

    Abrams, P. A. Does increased mortality favor the evolution of more rapid senescence? Evolution 47, 877–887 (1993).

  11. 11

    Sohal, R. S. in Insect Ageing (eds Collatz, K.-G. & Sohal, R. S.) 23–44 (Springer, Berlin, (1986)).

  12. 12

    Hölldobler, B. & Wilson, E. O. The Ants (Springer, Berlin, (1990)).

  13. 13

    Promislov, D. E. L. Senescence in natural populations of mammals: a comparative study. Evolution 45, 1869–1887 (1991).

  14. 14

    Felsenstein, J. Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am. Nat. 125, 1–15 (1985).

  15. 15

    Harvey, P. H. & Pagel, M. D. The Comparative Method in Evolutionary Biology (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, (1991)).

  16. 16

    Purvis, A. & Rambaut, A. Comparative analysis by independent constrast (CAIC): an Apple Macintosh application for analysing comparative data. Comp. Appl. Biosci. 11, 247–251 (1995).

  17. 17

    Keller, L. (ed.). Queen Number and Sociality in Insects (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, (1993)).

  18. 18

    Keller, L. The assessment of reproductive success of queens in ants and other social insects. Oikos 67, 177–180 (1993).

  19. 19

    Keller, L. Social life: the paradox of multiple-queen colonies. Trends Ecol. Evol. 10, 355–360 (1995).

  20. 20

    Bourke, A. F. G. & Franks, N. R. Social Evolution in Ants (Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, (1995)).

  21. 21

    Ross, K. G. & Keller, L. Ecology and evolution of social organization—insights from fire ants and other highly eusocial insects. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 26, 631–656 (1995).

  22. 22

    Nonacs, P. Queen number in colonies of social Hymenoptera as a kin-selected adaption. Evolution 42, 566–580 (1988).

  23. 23

    Reeve, H. K. & Nonacs, P. Within-group aggression and the value of group members—theory and a field test with social wasps. Behav. Ecol. 8, 75–82 (1997).

  24. 24

    Promislow, D. E. L. Senescence in natural populations of mammals: a comparative study. Evolution 45, 1869–1887 (1991).

  25. 25

    Partridge, L. & Fowler, K. Direct and correlated responses to selection on age at reproduction in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 46, 76–91 (1992).

  26. 26

    Jarvis, J. U. M. & Bennett, N. C. in The Biology of the Naked Mole-rat (eds Sherman, P. W., Jarvis, J. U. M. & Alexander, R. D.) 66–69 (Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, (1991)).

  27. 27

    Purvis, A., Gittleman, J. L. & Luh, H.-K. Truth or consequences: effects of phylogenetic accuracy on two comparative methods. J. Theor. Biol. 167, 293–300 (1994).

  28. 28

    Garland, T. J., Harvey, P. H. & Ives, A. R. Procedures for the analysis of comparative data using independent contrasts. Syst. Biol. 41, 18–32 (1992).

  29. 29

    Ridley, M. Mating frequency and fecundity in insects. Biol. Rev. 63, 509–549 (1988).

  30. 30

    Ridley, M. Clutch size and mating frequency in parasitic Hymenoptera. Am. Nat. 142, 893–910 (1993).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank P. Abrams, A. Bourke, W. Brown, M. Chapuisat, B. Charlesworth, M.Milinski, L. Partridge, N. Perrin, F. Ratnieks, M. Rose, K. Reeve, M. Ridley and S. Stearns for comments on the manuscript, and S. Cover for constructing the ant phylogeny. This work was funded by grants from the Swiss NSF (L.K.).

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Institute of Zoology and Animal Ecology, University of Lausanne, Bâtiment de Biologie, Lausanne, 1015, Switzerland

    • Laurent Keller
  2. Institute of Zoology, University of Bern, Ethologische Station Hasli, Hinterkappelen, 3032, Switzerland

    • Laurent Keller
    •  & Michel Genoud

Authors

  1. Search for Laurent Keller in:

  2. Search for Michel Genoud in:

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laurent Keller.

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Issue Date

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/40130

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.