Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Research Article
  • Published:

Evidence to suggest biased phenotypes in children with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder from completely ascertained trios

Abstract

The transmission disequilibrium test (TDT) is widely used as a robust statistical method to test for genetic association due to linkage based upon analysis of parent-proband trios. The TDT and other family-based tests (eg haplotype relative risk method) are commonly used in association studies including those of ADHD because of concerns that the case-control design has a strong tendency for false positives due to poor matching between cases and controls. Unfortunately, it is not always possible to obtain DNA from both parents in studies of this design, even where the onset of disorder is in childhood, and usually the missing parent is the father. Despite the fact that methods exist for analysis where one parent is missing, many family-based studies are based on the collection or analysis of complete trios only. However this selection process might potentially introduce bias, particularly for studies of behavioural phenotypes like ADHD because the phenotype of proband or parents might influence family stability and therefore complete parental ascertainment. We set out to examine whether children with ADHD and for whom DNA samples from fathers were missing (‘duos’) differed phenotypically from children for whom genotype information was available from both parents (‘trios’). Children from duos showed a significantly higher frequency of DMS-IV ADHD-combined type, significantly more co-morbid conduct disorder and conduct disorder symptoms, and a trend for higher total ADHD symptom scores. Excluding duos from sample collection and analysis may result in systematic bias. If comorbid conduct disorder and ADHD-combined type index increased genetic liability, exclusion of duos could further reduce the power of the TDT (and similar tests) to detect susceptibility genes for ADHD, or replicate effects detected by case-control analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Craddock N, Owen MJ . Modern molecular genetic approaches to psychiatric disease Br Med Bull 1996 52: 434–452

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Craddock N, Dave S, Greening J . Association studies of bipolar disorder Bipolar Dis 2001 3: 284–298

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Owen MJ, Craddock N . Modern molecular genetic approaches to complex traits: implications for psychiatric disease Mol Psychiatry 1996 1: 21–26

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Spielman RS, McGinnis RE, Ewens WJ . Transmission test for linkage disequilibrium: the insulin gene region and insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) Am J Hum Genet 1993 52: 506–516

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Sham P, Curtis D . An extended transmission/disequilibrium test (ETDT) for multi-allele marker loci Ann Hum Genet 1995 59: 323–336

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Spielman RS, Ewens WJ . A sibship test for linkage in the presence of association: the sib transmission/disequilibrium test Am J Hum Genet 1998 62: 450–458

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Clayton D, Jones DB . Transmission/disequilibrium tests for extended marker haplotypes Am J Hum Genet 2000 65: 1161–1169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Angold A, Costello EJ . The Child Adolescent Psychiatric Assessment (CAPA) J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2000 39: 39–48

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Holmes J, Lawson DC, Pay HM, Fitzpatrick H, Trumper AL, Harrington R, Thapar A . The Child Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Teacher Telephone Interview (CHATTI): reliability and validity findings Unpublished data

  10. Holmes J, Payton A, Barrett JH, Hever T, Fitzpatrick H, Trumper AL et al. A family-based and case-control association study of the dopamine D4 reception gene and dopamine transporter gene in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder Mol Psychiatry 2000 5: 523–530

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Conners CK . Rating scales in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: use in assessment and treatment and monitoring J Clin Psychiatry 1998 59: 24–30

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Thapar A, Holmes J, Poulton K, Harrington R . Genetic basis of attention deficit and hyperactivity Br J Psychiatry 1999 174: 105–111

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Thapar A . In: Plomin R, DeFries J, Craig I, McGuffin P (eds) Behavioural Genetics in the Post-Genomic Era APA Books (in press)

  14. Sherman DK, Iacono WG, McGue MK . Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder dimensions: a twin study of inattention and impulsivity-hyperactivity J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 1997 36: 745–753

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hudziak JJ, Rudiger LP, Neale MC, Heath AC, Todd RD . A twin study of inattentive, aggressive and anxious/depressed behaviours J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 1998 39: 469–476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Faraone SV, Biederman J, Monuteaux MC . Toward guidelines for pedigree selection in genetic studies of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder Genet Epidemiol 2000 18: 1–16

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Smalley SL, McGough JJ, Del'Homme M, Newdelman J, Gordon E, Kim T et al. Familial clustering of symptoms and disruptive behaviors in multiplex families with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2000 39: 1143–1153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Todd RD, Rasmussen ER, Neuman RJ, Reich W, Hudziak JJ, Bucholz KK et al. Familiality and heritability of subtypes of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in a population sample of adolescent female twins Am J Psychiatry 2001 158: 1891–1898

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Swanson JM, Sunohara GA, Kennedy JL, Regino R, Fineberg E, Wigal T et al. Association of the dopamine receptor D4 (DRD4) with a refined phenotype of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD): a family-based approach Mol Psychiatry 1998 3: 38–41

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Rowe DC, Stever C, Giedinghagen LN, Gard JMC, Cleveland HH, Terris ST et al. Dopamine DRD4 receptor polymorphism and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder Mol Psychiatry 1998 3: 419–426

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Waldman ID, Rowe DC, Abramowitz A, Kozel ST, Mohr JH, Sherman SL et al. Association of the dopamine transporter (DAT1) and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children: heterogeneity owing to diagnostic subtype and severity Am J Hum Genet 1998 63: 1767–1776

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Thapar A, Harrington R, McGuffin P . Examining the comorbidity of ADHD related behaviours and conduct problems using a twin study design Br J Psychiatry 2001 179: 224–229

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Holmes J, Payton A, Barrett J, Harrington R, McGuffin P, Owen M et al. Association of DRD4 in children with ADHD and comorbid conduct problems Am J Med Genet 2002 114: 150–153

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Mill J, Currans S, Kent L, Richards S, Gould A, Virdee V et al. Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and the dopamine D4 receptor gene: evidence of association but no linkage in a UK sample Mol Psychiatry 2001 6: 440–444

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Faraone SV, Doyle AE, Mick E, Biederman J . Meta-analysis of the association between dopamine D4 gene 7-repeat allele and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder Am J Psychiatry 2001 158: 1052–1057

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Jane Holmes, Tracey Hever, Anne Trumper and Helen Fitzpatrick and Bill Ollier, Jane Worthington and Richard Harrington who were originally involved in the Manchester sample collection and genotyping which was funded by Action Research and Sparks. Current work at Cardiff and Kate Langley are supported by the Wellcome Trust. Lindsey Kent has been supported by a Wellcome Trust research training fellowship.

We are grateful to all the families and children who participated in this study and the clinicians who supported this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A Thapar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

West, A., Langley, K., Hamshere, M. et al. Evidence to suggest biased phenotypes in children with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder from completely ascertained trios. Mol Psychiatry 7, 962–966 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.mp.4001129

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.mp.4001129

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links