Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Relative prevalence of different fetishes

Abstract

The aim of this study was to estimate the relative frequency of Fetishes in a large sample of individuals. Using the Internet as a data source, we examined 381 discussion groups. We estimate, very conservatively, that at least 5000 individuals were targeted. The relative frequency of each preference category was estimated considering (a) the number of groups devoted to the category, (b) the number of individuals participating in the groups and (c) the number of messages exchanged. The three measures agree both parametrically (Cronbach's α=0.91) and non-parametrically (Kendall's W=0.94, P<0.01). Preferences for body parts or features and for objects usually associated with the body were most common (33 and 30%, respectively), followed by preferences for other people's behavior (18%), own behavior (7%), social behavior (7%) and objects unrelated to the body (5%). Feet and objects associated with feet were the most common target of preferences. These findings provide the first large database in an area, where the knowledge is particularly scarce.

This is a preview of subscription content

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

$32.00

All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1

References

  1. Wilson GD . An ethological approach to sexual deviation. In: Wilson GD (ed). Variant Sexuality: Research and Theory. Croom Helm: London, 1987, pp. 84–115.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mason FL . Fetishism, psychopathology and theory. In: Laws RD, O'Donohue W (ed). Sexual Deviance, Theory, Assessment and Treatment. The Guilford Press: New York, 1997, pp. 75–109.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Troisi A . Sexual disorders in the context of Darwinian psychiatry. J Endocrinol Invest 2003; 26 (Suppl 3): 54–57.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lowenstein LF . Fetishes and their associated behavior. Sexuality and Disability 2002; 20: 135–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV-TR). American Psychiatric Association: Arlington, VA, 2000.

  6. Junginger J . Fetishism, assessment and treatment. In: Laws RD, O'Donahoue W (ed). Sexual Deviance, Theory, Assessment and Treatment. The Guilford Press: New York, 1997, pp. 92–110.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chalkley AJ, Powell GE . The clinical description of forty-eight cases of sexual fetishism. Br J Psychiatry 1983; 142: 292–295.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kaplan EH . Model-based representations of human sexual behavior. In: Abramson PR, Pinkerton SD (ed). Sexual Nature Sexual Culture. University of Chicago Press: Chicago, 1995, pp. 353–370.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Grammer KBF, Juette A, Ronzal G, Thornhill R . Female faces and bodies: N-dimensional feature space and attractiveness. In: Rhodes G, Zebrowitz LA (ed). Facial Attractiveness: Evolutionary, Cognitive, and Social Perspectives, Vol. 1, Advances in Cognition, Ablex: London, 2002, pp. 121–136.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bocklandt S, Hamer DH . Beyond hormones: a novel hypothesis for the biological basis of male sexual orientation. J Endocrinol Invest 2003; 26: 8–12.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Enquist M, Ghirlanda S, Lundqvist D, Wachtmeister CA . An ethological theory of attractiveness. In: Rhodes G, Zebrowitz LA (ed). Facial Attractiveness: Evolutionary, Cognitive, and Social Perspectives, Vol. 1, Advances in Cognition, Ablex: London, 2002 pp. 24–49.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Love B . Encyclopedia of Unusual Sex Practices. Abacus: London, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Freud S . Three Essays on the Theory of Sexuality. Hogarth Press: London, 1905/1965.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Freud S . Fetishism. Hogarth Press: London, 1905/1965.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Zerbe KJ . Your feet's too big: an inquiry into psychological and symbolic meanings of the foot. Psychoanal Rev 1985; 72: 301–314.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kruijt JP, Ten Cate CJ, Meeuwissen GB . The influence of siblings on the development of sexual preferences of male zebra finches. Dev Psychobiol 1983; 16: 233–239.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bischof HJ . Sexual imprinting as a two-stage process'. In: Hogan JA, Bolhuis JJ (ed). Causal Mechanisms of Behavioural Development. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 1994, pp. 82–97.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Bereczkei T, Gyuris P, Weisfeld GE . Sexual imprinting in human mate choice. Proc Biol Sci 2004; 271: 1129–1134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Pfaus JG, Kippin TE, Centeno S . Conditioning and sexual behavior: a review. Horm Behav 2001; 40: 291–321.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Rowland D, Perelman M, Althof S, Barada J, McCullough A, Bull S et al. Self-reported premature ejaculation and aspects of sexual functioning and satisfaction. J Sex Med 2004; 1: 225–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Leiblum S, Brown C, Wan J, Rawlinson L . Persistent sexual arousal syndrome: a descriptive study. J Sex Med 2005; 2: 331–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Cooper A, Sherer CR, Boies SC . Sexuality on the Internet: from sexual exploration to pathological expression. Professional Psychol Res Pract 1999; 30: 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Birnbaum MH . Human research and data collection via the internet. Annu Rev Psychol 2004; 55: 803–832.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Berk R, Abramson PR, Okami P . Sexual activity as told in surveys. In: Abramson PR, Pinkerton SD (ed). Sexual Nature Sexual Culture. Chicago University Press: Chicago, 1995, pp. 371–386.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Lenhart A, Horrigan J, Rainie L, Allen K, Boyce A, Madden M et al. The ever-shifting internet population: a new look at internet access and the digital divide. Report of The Pew Internet & American Life Project, http://www.pewinternet.org. 2003.

  26. Money J . Gay, Straight, and In-Between. Oxford University Press: Oxford, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was partially funded by the Italian Ministry of University, Education and Research (PRIN 2003 and 2005 grants) and by an unrestricted grant from Pfizer Italy.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E A Jannini.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Scorolli, C., Ghirlanda, S., Enquist, M. et al. Relative prevalence of different fetishes. Int J Impot Res 19, 432–437 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijir.3901547

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijir.3901547

Further reading

Search

Quick links