Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Alterations in grip strength during male sexual arousal

Abstract

Although it is known that alterations in grip strength occur under a number of conditions, little is known about relationships between grip strength and sexual arousal. This relationship was investigated in 30 healthy heterosexual males, who viewed both erotic and nonerotic videos. A questionnaire was used to assess the extent of sexual arousal. The grip strengths of both hands were measured with a five-position (P1–P5) dynamometer, before and after watching the videos. After watching the erotic video, there was a statistically significant reduction in grip strength for the P2 position, with nonsignificant overall reductions in grip strength for all other positions tested. No such effect was observed in control tests. The results indicate that during sexual arousal, the neural system is likely to reduce the output to muscles not directly related to sexual function, presumably to enhance the physiological responses of sexual arousal.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Redoute J, Stoleru S, Gregoire MC, Costes N, Cinotti L, Lavenne F et al. Brain processing of visual sexual stimuli in human males. Hum Brain Mapping 2000; 11: 162–177.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Greenberg JS, Bruess CE, Haffner D . Exploring the Dimensions of Human Sexuality, 2nd edn, vol. Xxi, Jones and Bartlett Publishers, Inc.: Sudbury, MA 2004, 778pp.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Rowland DL, Heiman JR, Gladue BA, Hatch JP, Doering CH, Weiler SJ . Endocrine, psychological and genital response to sexual arousal in men. Psychoneuroendocrinology 1987; 12: 149–158.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kruger T, Exton MS, Pawlak C, Von Zur Muhlen A, Hartmann U, Schedlowski M . Neuroendocrine and cardiovascular response to sexual arousal and orgasm in men. Psychoneuroendocrinology 1998; 23: 401–411.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Haake P, Krueger TH, Goebel MU, Heberling KM, Hartmann U, Schedlowski M . Effects of sexual arousal on lymphocyte subset circulation and cytokine production in man. Neuroimmunomodulation 2004; 11: 293–298.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Stoleru S, Gregoire MC, Gerard D, Decety J, Lafarge E, Cinotti L et al. Neuroanatomical correlates of visually evoked sexual arousal in human males. Arch Sex Behav 1999; 28: 1–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Park K, Seo JJ, Kang HK, Ryu SB, Kim HJ, Jeong GW . A new potential of blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) functional MRI for evaluating cerebral centers of penile erection. Int J Impot Res 2001; 13: 73–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Nancy Fugate Woods RN . Human Sexuality in Health and Illness. C.V. Mosby Company: London, 1979, pp. 3–12.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mathiowetz V, Kashman N, Volland G, Weber K, Dowe M, Rogers S . Grip and pinch strength: normative data for adults. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1985; 66: 69–74.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Grant KA, Habes DJ, Steward LL . An analysis of handle designs for reducing manual effort: the influence of grip diameter. Int J Ind Ergonom 1992; 10: 199–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Atkinson G, Coldwells A, Reilly T, Waterhouse J . A comparison of circadian rhythms in work performance between physically active and inactive subjects. Ergonomics 1993; 36: 273–281.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Gifford LS . Circadian variation in human flexibility and grip strength. Australian J Physiother 1987; 33: 3–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Mathiowetz V . Reliability and validity of grip and pinch strength measurements. Phys Rehabil Med 1991; 2: 201–212.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sherwood L . Human Physiology: from Cells to Systems. Wadsworth Publishing Company: Belmont, USA, 1997, pp. 320–321.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Crosby CA, Wehbe MA, Mawr B . Hand strength: normative values (see comment). J Hand Surg – Am Vol 1994; 19: 665–670.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Arnow BA, Desmond JE, Banner LL, Glover GH, Solomon A, Polan ML et al. Brain activation and sexual arousal in healthy, heterosexual males. Brain 2002; 125: 1014–1023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Mouras H, Stoleru S, Bittoun J, Glutron D, Pelegrini-Issac M, Paradis AL et al. Brain processing of visual sexual stimuli in healthy men: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Neuroimage 2003; 20: 855–869.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bocher M, Chisin R, Parag Y, Freedman N, Meir Weil Y, Lester H et al. Cerebral activation associated with sexual arousal in response to a pornographic clip: A 15O-H2O PET study in heterosexual men. Neuroimage 2001; 14: 105–117.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C Jiao.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jiao, C., Turman, B., Weerakoon, P. et al. Alterations in grip strength during male sexual arousal. Int J Impot Res 18, 206–209 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijir.3901399

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijir.3901399

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links