Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

A 15-item short form of the Psychological and Interpersonal Relationship Scales

Abstract

Erectile dysfunction (ED) is a prevalent condition associated with complex psychological and interpersonal issues. The Psychological and Interpersonal Relationship Scales (PAIRS) is a valid and reliable measure of Sexual Self-Confidence, Spontaneity, and Time Concerns associated with ED and its treatment. This paper describes the development and validation of a 15-item, short form of PAIRS (SF-PAIRS). Domain scores and psychometric properties of SF-PAIRS were assessed using data from the validation studies of the full-length (23-item) PAIRS. Items in the two briefer scales (Spontaneity and Time Concerns) were identified using internal consistency analyses and crossvalidated during two multinational clinical trials and a community sample. The scales in SF-PAIRS showed good internal consistency, convergent and discriminant validity, were stable over a 2-week period, and showed sensitivity to treatment. SF-PAIRS is a valid, brief measure of psychological and interpersonal outcomes associated with ED.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. NIH Consensus Conference. NIH consensus development panel on impotence. JAMA 1993; 270: 83–90.

  2. Althof SE . Quality of life and erectile dysfunction. Urology 2002; 59: 803–810.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Litwin MS, Nied RJ, Dhanani N . Health-related quality of life in men with erectile dysfunction. J Gen Intern Med 1998; 13: 159–166.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Shabsigh R, Klein LT, Seidman S, Kaplan SA, Lehrhoff BJ, Ritter JS . Increased incidence of depressive symptoms in men with erectile dysfunction. Urology 1998; 52: 848–852.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Lewis RW, Fugl-Meyer KS, Bosch R, Fugl-Meyer AR, Laumann EO, Lizza E et al. Epidemiology/risk factors of sexual dysfunction. J Sex Med 2004; 1: 35–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Laumann EO, Nicolosi A, Glasser DB, Paik A, Gingell C, Moreira E et al. Sexual problems among women and men aged 40–80 y: prevalence and correlates identified in the Global Study of Sexual Attitudes and Behaviors. Int J Impot Res 2005; 17: 39–57.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Nicolosi A, Laumann EO, Glasser DB, Moreira A, Paik A, Gingell C et al. Sexual behavior and sexual dysfunctions after age 40: the Global Study of Sexual Attitudes and Behaviors. Urology 2004; 64: 991–997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Rosen RC, Fisher WA, Eardley I, Niederberger C, Nadel A, Sand M . The Multinational Men's Attitudes to Life Events and Sexuality (MALES) study: prevalence of erectile dysfunction and related health concerns in the general population. Curr Med Res Opin 2004; 20: 607–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Feldman HA, Goldstein I, Hatzichristou DG, Krane RJ, McKinlay JB . Impotence and its medical and psychosocial correlates: results of the Massachusetts Male Aging Study. J Urol 1994; 151: 54–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Guiliano FA, Leriche A, Jaudinot EO, Solesse de Gendre A . Prevalence of erectile dysfunction among 7689 patients with diabetes or hypertension, or both. Urology 2004; 64: 1196–1201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Brock GB, McMahon CG, Chen KK, Costigan T, Shen W, Watkins V et al. Efficacy and safety of tadalafil for the treatment of erectile dysfunction: results of integrated analyses. J Urol 2002; 168: 1332–1336.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Swindle RW, Cameron AE, Lockhart DC, Rosen RC . The Psychological and Interpersonal Relationship Scales: assessing psychological and relationship outcomes associated with erectile dysfunction and its treatment. Arch Sex Behav 2004; 33: 19–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Cameron A, Rosen RC, Swindle RW . Sexual and relationship characteristics among an internet-based sample of US men with and without erectile dysfunction. J Sex Marital Ther 2005; 31: 229–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Rosen RC, Broderick GA, Shabsigh R, Swindle RW, Lockhart D, Cameron A . Sensitivity of the Psychological and Interpersonal Relationship Scales to Oral Therapies for Erectile Dysfunction. J Sex Med 2005; 2: 461–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hays RD, Hadorn D . Responsiveness to change: an aspect of validity, not a separate dimension. Qual Life Res 1992; 2: 73–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Rosen RC, Riley A, Wagner G, Osterloh IH, Kirkpatrick J, Mishra A . The International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF): a multidimensional scale for assessment of erectile dysfunction. Urology 1997; 49: 822–830.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Cappelleri JC, Rosen RC, Smith MD, Mishra A, Osterloh IH . Diagnostic evaluation of the erectile function domain of the International Index of Erectile Function. Urology 1999; 54: 346–351.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Stroberg P, Murphy A, Costigan T . Switching patients with erectile dysfunction from sildenafil citrate to tadalafil: results of a European multicenter, open-label study of patient preference. Clin Ther 2003; 25: 2724–2737.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. von Keitz A, Rajfer J, Segal S, Murphy A, Denne J, Costigan T et al. A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, crossover study to evaluate patient preference between tadalafil and sildenafil. Eur Urol 2004; 45: 499–509.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Rosen RC, Cappelleri JC, Smith MD, Lipsky J, Pena BM . Development and evaluation of an abridged, 5-item version of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) as a diagnostic tool for erectile dysfunction. Int J Impot Res 1999; 11: 319–326.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Ware JE, Kosinski M, Keller SD . A 12-item short form health survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care 1996; 34: 220–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Snell Jr WE . The multidimensional sexual self-concept questionnaire. In: Davis CM, Yarber WL, Bauserman R, Schreer G, Davis SL (eds.), Handbook of Sexuality-Related Measures. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 1998, pp. 521–524.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Fichten CS, Spector I, Amsel R, Creti L, Brender W, Libman E . Sexual self-efficacy scale-erectile functioning. In: Davis CM, Yarber WL, Bauserman R, Schreer G, Davis SL (eds.), Handbook of Sexuality-Related Measures. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 1998, pp. 534–537.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Veroff J, Kulka RA, Douvan E . Mental Health in America: Patterns of Help-Seeking from 1957 to 1976. New York: Basic Books, 1981 352pp.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hendrick S . A generic measure of relationship satisfaction. J Marriage Fam 1988; 50: 93–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Sprecher S, Regan PC . Passionate and companionate love in courting and young married couples. Sociol Inq 1998; 68: 163–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Cohen J . Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences 2nd edn. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1988 567pp.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R Swindle.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Swindle, R., Cameron, A. & Rosen, R. A 15-item short form of the Psychological and Interpersonal Relationship Scales. Int J Impot Res 18, 82–88 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijir.3901381

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijir.3901381

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links