Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Effect of penile size on nocturnal erections: evaluation with NPTR testing with men having micropenis

Abstract

There has been conflicting opinions in the literature regarding sexual function in hypogonadal men with micropenis. In this study we aimed to evaluate erectile function in hypogonadal men with micropenis by nocturnal penile tumescence and rigidity testing (NPTR) and compared the results with young potent normal penile sized men. A total of 15 men (ages 17–30 y) defined having a micropenis with a stretched penile length of less than 9.3 cm were constituted the study group. Mean stretched penile length was 6.8±1.6 cm (range 3.6–7.8 cm). Karyotype analysis showed 46XY in all cases. Control group included 22 potent and normal penile sized men (23–29 y). All subjects completed three sessions of consecutive nights using the RigiScan Plus device. Comparison of the results of NPTR of control group with study group revealed that number and duration of erectile episodes (P<0.001), duration of tip rigidity >60% (P<0.01), TAU tip and TAU base (P=0.001), and RAU base (P=0.01) were found to be significantly lower in men with micropenis. In conclusion, our study showed that men with micropenis are associated with decreased nocturnal erectile activity.

This is a preview of subscription content

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

$32.00

All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1
Figure 2

References

  1. Lee PA et al. Micropenis. Criteria, etiologies and classification. Johns Hopkins Med J 1980; 146: 156–161.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Evans BA, Williams DM, Hughes IA . Normal postnatal androgen production and action in isolated micropenis and isolated hypospadias. Arch Dis Child 1991; 66: 1033–1036.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bin-Abbas B, Conte FA, Grumbach M, Kaplan SL . Congenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadism and micropenis: effect of testosterone treatment on adult penile size—Why sex reversal is no indicated. J Pediatr 1999; 134: 579–583.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. McLorie GA, Khoury AE, Husmann DA . Surgery for micropenis in childhood. Dial Pediatr Urol 1989; 12: 6.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mills TM, Lewis RW . The role of androgens in the erectile response: a 1999 perspective. Mol Urol 1999; 3: 75–80.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Granata AR, Rochira V, Lerchl A . Relationship between sleep-related erections and testosterone levels in men. J Androl 1997; 18: 522–527.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Tenover JL . Testosterone and aging male. J Androl 1997; 18: 103–106.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Woodhouse CRJ . Sexual function in boys born with extrophy, myelomeningocele and micropenis. Urology 1998; 52: 3–11.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Reilly JM, Woodhouse CRJ . Small penis and the male sexual role. J Urol 1989; 142: 569–571.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kadioğlu P et al. Penile hemodynamics in hypogonadal men with micropenis. Urology 2003; 61: 426–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Levine LA, Lenting EL . Use of nocturnal penile tumescence and rigidity in the evaluation of male sexual dysfunction. Urol Clin N Am 1995; 22: 775–788.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Wessels H, Lue T, McAninch JW . The relationship between penile length in the flaccid and errect status: guidelines for penile lengthing. J Urol 1995; 153(Part 2): 379A.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Cunnigham GR et al. Testosterone replacement therapy and sleep-related erections in hypogonadal men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1990; 70: 792–797.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bancroft J, Wu FCW . Changes in erectile responsiveness during androgen replacement therapy. Arch Sex Behav 1983; 12: 59–66.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kwan M et al. The nature of androgen action on male sexuality: a combined laboratory self report study of hypogonadal men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1983; 57: 557–562.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Karacan I et al. Sleep-related penile tumescence as a function of age. Am J Psychiatry 1975; 132: 932–937.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Yaman Ö, Tokatlı Z, Inal T, Anafarta K . Effect of sildenafil on nocturnal erections of potent men. Int J Impot Res 2003; 15: 117–121.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Judson JVW, Calikoglu A . Should boys with micropenis be reared as girls. J Pediatr 1999; 134: 537–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to O Yaman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yaman, O., Soygür, T., Akand, M. et al. Effect of penile size on nocturnal erections: evaluation with NPTR testing with men having micropenis. Int J Impot Res 17, 243–247 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijir.3901292

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijir.3901292

Keywords

  • micropenis
  • erectile function
  • NPTR testing

Search

Quick links