Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Role of penile electrodermal activity in the evaluation of autonomic innervation of corpus cavernosum


Electrodiagnostic tests measuring the activities of cavernous smooth muscle and sudomotor structures of penile skin are used in order to evaluate autonomic innervation of the penis. Owing to closeness of these tissues, the interference of sympathetic activity during recording is a possibility. In this study, we investigated this possibility in 10 patients whose cavernosal tissues were destroyed during penile prosthesis implantation by comparing the pre- and postoperative penile skin electrodermal activities. Penile electrodermal activities were recorded with surface electrodes before and after the operation. All of the patients had spontaneous and evoked penile electrodermal activity (EDA). The mean amplitude of evoked EDA decreased from 2159±700 to 1413±515 μV following penile prosthesis surgery (P=0.017). The decrease in the amplitude of penile-evoked EDA following penile prosthesis implantation suggests the contribution of cavernous smooth muscle activity to the sudomotor responses prior to operation. Although corpus cavernosum sympathetic activity contributes to the penile skin recordings, these recordings are mostly the result of penile skin sudomotor sympathetic activity. Therefore, surface potentials recorded from penile skin should not be used for the evaluation of autonomic innervation of corpus cavernosum.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Get just this article for as long as you need it


Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2


  1. Fowler CJ . The neurology of male sexual dysfunction and its investigation by clinical neurophysiological methods. Br J Urol 1998; 81: 785–795.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Stewart JD . Autonomic regulation of sexual function. In: Low PA (ed). Clinical Autonomic Disorders 2 edn, Chapter 11. Lippincott-Raven: Philadelphia, 1997 p 129.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Opsomer RJ, Boccasena P, Traversa R, Rossini PM . Sympathetic skin responses from the limbs and the genitalia: normative study and contribution to the evaluation of neurourological disorders. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1996; 101: 25–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Derouet H et al. Penile sympathic skin response in erectile dysfunction. Eur Urol 1995; 28: 314–319.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Wagner G, Gerstenberg T, Levin RJ . Electrical activity of corpus cavernosum during flaccidity and erection of the human penis: a new diagnostic method? J Urol 1989; 142: 723–725.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Yilmaz U et al. Evoked cavernous activity. J Urol 2002; 167: 188–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Jiang XG et al. The value of corpus cavernosum electromyography in erectile dysfunction: current status and future prospect. Eur Urol 2003; 43: 211–218.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Stief CG et al. Transcutaneous registration of cavernous smooth muscle electrical activity: noninvasive diagnosis of neurogenic autonomic impotence. J Urol 1992; 147: 47–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Benevides MD, Carson CC . Intraurethral application of alprostadil in patients with failed inflatable penile prosthesis. J Urol 2000; 163: 785–787.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Mulhall JP et al. The impact of sildenafil citrate on sexual satisfaction profiles in men with a penile prosthesis in situ. BJU Int 2004; 93: 97–99.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Low PA, Suarez GA, Benarroch EE . Clinical autonomic disorders: classification and clinical evaluation. In: Low PA (ed). Clinical Autonomic Disorders 2 edn, Chapter 1. Lippincott-Raven: Philadelphia, 1997 p 3.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sattar AA, Merckx LA, Wespes E . Penile electromyography and its smooth muscle content: interpretation of 25 impotent patients. J Urol 1996; 155: 909–912.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Truss MC et al. Single potential analysis of cavernous electrical activity. Four years' experience in more than 500 patients with erectile dysfunction. Eur Urol 1993; 24: 358–365.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Sasso F, Gulino G, Alcini E . Corpus cavernosum electromyography (CC-EMG): a new technique in the diagnostic work-up of impotence. Int Urol Nephrol 1996; 28: 805–818.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Fabra M, Frieling A, Porst H, Schneider E . Single potential analysis of corpus cavernosum electromyography for the assessment of erectile dysfunction: provocation, reproducibility and age dependence—findings in 36 healthy volunteers and 324 patients. J Urol 1997; 158: 444–450.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Merckx LA, de Bruyne RM, Keuppens FI . Electromyography of cavernous smooth muscle during flaccidity: evaluation of technique and normal values. Br J Urol 1993; 72: 353–358.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhu GY, Shen Y . Sympathetic skin response: a new test to diagnose erectile dysfunction. Asian J Androl 2001; 3: 45–48.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Tarchanoff J . Uber die galvanischen Erscheinungen an der Haut des Menschen bei Reizung der Sinnesorgane und bie verschiedenen Formen der psychischen Tatigkeit. Pflugers Arch 1890; 46: 46–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Shahani BT, Halperin JJ, Boulu P, Cohen J . Sympathetic skin response—a method of assessing unmyelinated axon dysfunction in peripheral neuropathies. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1984; 47: 536–542.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Ertekin C et al. Skin potentials (SP) recorded from the extremities and genital regions in normal and impotent subjects. Acta Neurol Scand 1987; 76: 28–36.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Ertekin C, Colakoglu Z, Altay B . Hand and genital sympathetic skin potentials in flaccid and erectile penile states in normal potent men and patients with premature ejaculation. J Urol 1995; 153: 76–79.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Lefaucheur JP et al. Relationship between penile thermal sensory threshold measurement and electrophysiologic tests to assess neurogenic impotence. Urology 2001; 57: 306–309.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Colakoglu Z, Kutluay E, Ertekin C . The nature of spontaneous cavernosal activity. BJU Int 1999; 83: 449–452.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Yarnitsky D, Sprecher E, Barilan Y, Vardi Y . Corpus cavernosum electromyogram: spontaneous and evoked electrical activities. J Urol 1995; 153 (Part 1): 653–654.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Stief CG, Hoppner C, Sauerwein D, Jonas U . Single potential analysis of cavernous electrical activity in spinal cord injury patients. J Urol 1994; 151: 367–372.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Schondorf R . Skin potentials: normal and abnormal. In: Low PA (ed). Clinical Autonomic Disorders 2 edn, Chapter 17. Lippincott-Raven: Philadelphia, 1997 p 221.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to A Soylu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Soylu, A., Yilmaz, U., Ozcan, C. et al. Role of penile electrodermal activity in the evaluation of autonomic innervation of corpus cavernosum. Int J Impot Res 16, 535–539 (2004).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:


  • penis
  • corpus cavernosum
  • electrodermal activity
  • surface recording

This article is cited by


Quick links