Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

The role of general practitioners in the management of erectile dysfunction—a qualitative study

International Journal of Impotence Research volume 16, pages 60–63 (2004)Cite this article

Abstract

The objective of this study was to explore the roles and perceptions of general practitioners (GPs) in the management of erectile dysfunction (ED). This qualitative study used focus group discussions and in-depth interviews. This study was conducted based on 28 GPs from an urban area in Malaysia who had managed patients with ED and prescribed anti-ED drugs. Main outcome measures included the roles of GPs in managing patients with ED (active or passive), perceptions regarding ED and the treatment, and factors influencing their decision to prescribe. Majority of the GPs assumed a passive role when managing patients with ED. This was partly due to their perception of the disease being nonserious. Some also perceived ED as mainly psychological in nature. The anti-ED drugs were often viewed as a lifestyle drug with potentially serious side effects. The fear of being perceived by patients as ‘pushing’ for the drug and being blamed if the patients were to develop serious side effects also hampered the management of this disease. GPs who participated in this study remained passive in identifying and treating patients with ED and this was attributed to their perception of the disease, drug treatment and patient's background.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Feldman HA et al. Impotence and its medical and psychosocial correlates: results of the Massachusetts Male Aging Study. J Urol 1994; 151: 54–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Laumann EO, Paik A, Rosen RC . Sexual dysfunction in the United States: prevalence and predictors. JAMA 1999; 281: 537–544.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Levine LA, Kloner RA . Importance of asking questions about erectile dysfunction. Am J Cardiol 2000; 86: 1210–1213.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Marwick C . Survey says patients expect little physician help on sex. JAMA 1999; 281: 2173–2174.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bradley CP . Factors which influence the decision whether or not to prescribe: the dilemma facing general practitioners. Br J Gen Pract 1992; 42: 454–458.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. The Process of Care Consensus Model. The process of care model for evaluation and treatment of erectile dysfunction. Int J Impot Res 1999; 11: 59–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Rutchik SD et al. Practice patterns in the diagnosis and treatment of erectile dysfunction among family practice physicians. Urology 2001; 57: 146–150.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Metz ME, Seibert MH . Men's expectations of physicians in sexual health concerns. J Sex Marital Ther 1990; 16: 79–88.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Pontin D, Porter T, McDonagh R . Investigating the effect of erectile dysfunction on the lives of men: a qualitative research study. J Clin Nurs 2002; 11: 264–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fink HA et al. Sildenafil for male erectile dysfunction—a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Intern Med 2002; 162: 1349–1360.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Conti CR, Pepine CJ, Sweeney M . Efficacy and safety of sildenafil citrate in the treatment of erectile dysfunction in patients with ischemic heart disease. Am J Cardiol 1999; 83: 29C–34C.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Perttula E . Physician attitudes and behaviour regarding erectile dysfunction in at-risk patients from a rural community. Postgrad Med J 1999; 75: 83–85.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported in part by educational grants from the Asia Pacific Society for Impotence Research (APSIR), and by GlaxoSmithKline Pharmaceutical and Bayer Healthcare.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Primary Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

    C J Ng

  2. Health Research Development Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

    W Y Low & W Y Choo

  3. College of Family Physician, Singapore

    N C Tan

Authors
  1. C J Ng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. W Y Low
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. N C Tan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. W Y Choo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C J Ng.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ng, C., Low, W., Tan, N. et al. The role of general practitioners in the management of erectile dysfunction—a qualitative study. Int J Impot Res 16, 60–63 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijir.3901141

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijir.3901141

Keywords

Search

Advanced search

Quick links