Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Human glans penis augmentation using injectable hyaluronic acid gel


Although augmentation phalloplasty is not an established procedure, some patients still need enlargement of their penis. Current penile augmentation is girth enhancement of penile body by dermofat graft. We performed this study to identify the efficacy and the patient’s satisfaction of human glans penis augmentation with injectable hyaluronic acid gel. In 100 patients of subjective small penis (Group I) and 87 patients of small glans after dermofat graft (Group II), 2 cm3 of hyaluronic acid gel was injected into the glans penis, subcutaneously. At 1 y after injection, changes of glandular diameter were measured by tapeline. Patient’s visual estimation of glandular size (Gr 0–4) and patient’s satisfaction (Grade (Gr) 0–4) were evaluated, respectively. Any adverse reactions were also evaluated. The mean age of patients was 42.2 (30–70) y in Group I and 42.13 (28–61) y in Group II. The maximal glandular circumference was significantly increased compared to basal circumference of 9.13±0.64 cm in Group I (P<0.01) and 9.49±1.05 cm in Group II (P<0.01) at 1 y after injection. Net increase of maximal glandular circumference after glans augmentation was 14.93±0.80 mm in Group I and 14.78±0.89 mm in Group II. In patient’s visual estimation, more than 50% of injected volume was maintained in 95% of Group 1 and 100% of Group II. The percentage of postoperative satisfaction (Gr 4, 5) was 77% in Group 1 and 69% in Group II. There was no abnormal reaction in area feeling, texture, and color. In most cases, initial discoloration by glandular swelling recovered to normal within 2 weeks. There were no signs of inflammation and no serious adverse reactions in all cases. These results suggest that injectable hyaluronic acid gel is a safe and effective material for augmentation of glans penis.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4


  1. Olenius M . The first clinical study using a new biodegradable implant for the treatment of lips, wrinkles, and folds. Aesth Plast Surg 1998; 22: 97–101.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Duranti F et al. Injectable hyaluronic acid gel for soft tissue augmentation. Dermatol Surg 1998; 24: 1317–1325.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Goa KL, Benfield P . Hyaluronic acid. A review of its pharmacology and use as a surgical aid in ophthalmology, and its therapeutic potential in joint disease and wound healing. Drugs 1994; 47: 536–566.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Moon DG, Kwak TI, Kim JJ . Cho HY . Effects of hyaluronic acid gel in penile augmentation. Int J Impot Res 2002; 14(Suppl 3): S40.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Burton JL, Cunliffe WJ . The subcutaneous fat. In: Rook A, Wilkinson DS, Champion RH, Ebling FJG, Burton JL (eds). Textbook of Dermatology. Blackwell: Oxford, 1986, pp 1870–1871.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Knapp TR, Kaplan EN, Daniels JR . Injectable collagen for soft tissue augmentation. Plast Reconstruct Surg 1977; 60: 898–905.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Comper WD, Laurent TC . Physiological function of connective tissue polysaccharides. Physiol Rev 1978; 58: 255–315.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Selmanowitz VJ, Orentreich N . Medical-grade fluid silicone: a monographic review. J Dermatol Surg Oncol 1977; 3: 597–611.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Elson ML . Soft tissue augmentation. A review. Dermatol Surg 1995; 21: 491–500.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Pollack SV . Silicone, fibrel, and collagen implantation for facial lines and wrinkles. J Dermatol Surg Oncol 1990; 16: 957–961.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Larsen NE et al. Hylan gel biomaterials: Dermal and immunologic compatibility. J Biomed Mater Res 1993; 27: 1129–1134.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Richter W . Nonimmunogenicity of purified hyaluronic acid preparations tested by passive cutaneous anaphylaxis. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 1974; 47: 211–217.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Richter W, Ryde E, Zetterstrom EO . Nonimmunogenicity of purified sodium hyaluronate preparation in man. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 1979; 59: 45–48.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to DG Moon.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kim, J., Kwak, T., Jeon, B. et al. Human glans penis augmentation using injectable hyaluronic acid gel. Int J Impot Res 15, 439–443 (2003).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:


  • hyaluronic acid
  • glans penis
  • augmentation

This article is cited by


Quick links