Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Research
  • Published:

Predictive validity of the Golombok Rust Inventory of Sexual Satisfaction (GRISS) for the presence of sexual dysfunctions within a Dutch urological population

Abstract

The objective of this study was to investigate the predictive validity of the Dutch translation of the Golombok Rust Inventory of Sexual Satisfaction (GRISS) for the presence of clinically relevant sexual dysfunctions and patient's need of help. A total of 57 male urological outpatients (age 50.7±13.2 y; range 27–77 y) completed the GRISS, a 28-item self-report questionnaire assessing sexual dysfunctions and sexual satisfaction in heterosexual relationships. GRISS subscales were found to differentiate multivariately between men with and without sexual dysfunctions. The erectile dysfunction (In the original English version of the GRISS, the term ‘impotence’ was used instead of ‘erectile dysfunction’), dissatisfaction, and infrequency subscales also differentiated univariately between these groups. The predictive validity for the presence of sexual dysfunctions and for the patients' need for professional help was investigated. Prediction models, derived by means of logistic regression analysis, were tested in a crossvalidation sample. Sensitivity and specificity for the presence of sexual dysfunctions, as well as the predictive values positive and negative were found to be satisfactory. The predictive validity of the GRISS was found equally satisfactory for the patients' need for professional help. The discriminant and predictive validity of the GRISS in men with and without sexual dysfunctions appeared satisfactory. Routine use of the GRISS appears warranted for the screening of sexual dysfunctions in new urological patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rust J, Golombok S . The Golombok Rust Inventory of Sexual Satisfaction (GRISS). Br J Clin Psychol 1985; 24: 63–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Rust J, Golombok S . The GRISS: a psychometric instrument for the assessment of sexual dysfunction. Arch Sex Behav 1986; 15: 157–165.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Rust J, Golombok S . The Golombok Rust Inventory of Sexual Satisfaction. Manual. NFER-Nelson: Windsor, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Frenken J, Vennix P . Sexuality Experiences Scales (SES); Manual. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Vennix P . De ILKS-gedachte en Andere Operationalisaties. NISSO: Zeist, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ter Kuile MM, Vroege JV, van Lankveld JJ . The Golombok Rust Inventory of Sexual Satisfaction; Dutch Translation and Adaptations. Leiden University Medical Centre: Leiden, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ter Kuile MM, van Lankveld JJDM, Kalkhoven P, van Egmond M . The Golombok Rust Inventory of Sexual Satisfaction (GRISS): psychometric properties within a Dutch population. J Sex Marit Ther 1999; 25: 59–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Collier JL . The use of the GRIMS and the GRISS in the assessment and outcome of sexual problems: are questionnaires of more value than a clinical interview? Sex Marit Ther 1989; 4: 11–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Van Lankveld JJDM, Ter Kuile MM . The Golombok Rust Inventory of Sexual Satisfaction (GRISS): predictive validity and construct validity in a Dutch population. Pers Indiv Diff 1999; 26: 1005–1023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Association AP . Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edn (DSM-IV). APA: Washington DC, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Slatford K, Currie C . Prevalence of psychosexual problems in patients attending a genitourinary clinic. Br J Vener Dis 1984; 60: 398–401.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Benet AE, Melman A . The epidemiology of erectile dysfunction. Urol Clin N-Amer 1995; 22: 699–709.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S . Applied Logistic Regression. John Wiley & Sons: New York, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS . Using Multivariate Statistics. HarperCollins: New York, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bachmann GA, Lweiblum SR, Grill J . Brief sexual inquiry in gynecologic practice. Obst Gynec 1989; 73: 425–427.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Van Lankveld JJ, Ter Kuile MM, Kenter GG, Van Hall EV, Weijenborg PTM . Seksuele klachten en ervaringen met seksueel en fysiek geweld bij gynaecologische patiënten. Ned Tijdschr Geneesk 1996; 140: 1903–1906.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Trivedi N, Sabini J . Volunteer bias, sexuality, and personality. Arch Sex Behav 1998; 27: 181–195.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Van Lankveld JJDM, Grotjohann Y, Van Lokven BME, Everaerd W . Characteristics of couples applying for bibliotherapy via different recruitment strategies: a multivariate comparison. J Sex Marit Ther 1999; 25: 197–209.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J J D M van Lankveld.

Appendices

Appendix 1

Table 4

Table 4 Brief sexual history questionnaire (translated from Dutch)

Appendix 2

Table 5

Table 5 Sample of items from the Golombok Rust Inventory of Sexual Satisfaction

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

van Lankveld, J., van Koeveringe, G. Predictive validity of the Golombok Rust Inventory of Sexual Satisfaction (GRISS) for the presence of sexual dysfunctions within a Dutch urological population. Int J Impot Res 15, 110–116 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijir.3900966

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijir.3900966

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links