Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Prevalence of erectile dysfunction: a systematic review of population-based studies

Abstract

A systematic review was conducted on the prevalence of erectile dysfunction (ED) in the general population. Studies were retrieved which reported prevalence rates of ED in the general population. Using a specially developed criteria list, the methodological quality of these studies was assessed and data on prevalence rates were extracted. We identified 23 studies from Europe (15), USA (5), Asia (2) and Australia (1). On our 12-item criteria list, the methodological quality ranged from 5 to 12. The prevalence of ED ranged from 2% in men younger than 40 y to 86% in men 80 y and older. Comparison between prevalence data is hampered by major methodological differences between studies, particularly in the use of various questionnaires and different definitions of ED. We stress the importance of providing all necessary information when reporting on the prevalence of ED. Moreover, international studies should be conducted to establish the true prevalence of ED across countries.

Your institute does not have access to this article

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

$32.00

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. Wagner G, Saenz de Tejada I . Update on male erectile dysfunction Br Med J 1998; 316: 678–682.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lewis RW . Epidemiology of erectile dysfunction Urol Clin N Am 2001; 28: 209–116 vii.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Melman A, Gingell JC . The epidemiology and pathophysiology of erectile dysfunction J Urol 1999; 161: 5–11.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lerner SE, Melman A, Christ GJ . A review of erectile dysfunction: new insights and more suggestions J Urol 1993; 149: 1246–1255.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bortolotti A, Parazzini F, Colli E, Landoni M . The epidemiology of erectile dysfunction and risk factors Int J Androl 1997; 20: 323–334.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Breslow RA, Ross SA, Weed DL . Quality of reviews in epidemiology Am J Public Health 1998; 88: 475–477.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Diokno AC, Brown MB, Herzog AR . Sexual function in the elderly Arch Intern Med 1990; 150: 197–200.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Solstad K, Hertoft P . Frequency of sexual problems and sexual dysfunction in middle-aged Danish men Arch Sex Behav 1993; 22: 51–58.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Solstad K, Davidsen M . Sexual behaviour and attitudes of Danish middle-aged men—methodological considerations Maturitas 1993; 17: 139–149.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Feldman HA et al. Impotence and its medical and psychosocial correlates: results of the Massachusetts Male Aging Study J Urol 1994; 151: 54–61.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Araujo AB et al. The relationship between depressive symptoms and male erectile dysfunction: cross-sectional results from the Massachusetts Male Aging Study Psychosom Med 1998; 60: 458–465.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kleinman KP et al. A new surrogate variable for erectile dysfunction status in the Massachusetts male aging study J Clin Epidemiol 2000; 53: 71–87.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Derby CA et al. Measurement of erectile dysfunction in population-based studies: the use of a single question self-assessment in the Massachusetts Male Aging Study Int J Impot Res 2000; 12: 197–204.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Panser LA et al. Sexual function of men ages 40 to 79 years: the Olmsted County Study of Urinary Symptoms and Health Status Among Men J Am Geriatr Soc 1995; 43: 1107–1111.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Panser LA et al. The natural history of prostatism: the effects of non-response bias Int J Epidemiol 1994; 23: 1198–1205.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Epstein RS et al. Validation of a new quality of life questionnaire for benign prostatic hyperplasia J Clin Epidemiol 1992; 45: 1431–1445.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Helgason AR et al. Sexual desire, erection, orgasm and ejaculatory functions and their importance to elderly Swedish men: a population-based study Age Ageing 1996; 25: 285–291.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Helgason AR et al. Factors associated with waning sexual function among elderly men and prostate cancer patients J Urol 1997; 158: 155–159.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Macfarlane GJ et al. The relationship between sexual life and urinary condition in the French community J Clin Epidemiol 1996; 49: 1171–1176.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sagnier PP et al. Results of an epidemiological survey using a modified American Urological Association symptom index for benign prostatic hyperplasia in France J Urol 1994; 151: 1266–1270.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Malmsten UG, Milsom I, Molander U, Norlen LJ . Urinary incontinence and lower urinary tract symptoms: an epidemiological study of men aged 45 to 99 years J Urol 1997; 158: 1733–1737.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ventegodt S . Sex and the quality of life in Denmark Arch Sex Behav 1998; 27: 295–307.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Frankel SJ et al. Sexual dysfunction in men with lower urinary tract symptoms J Clin Epidemiol 1998; 51: 677–685.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Jolleys JV et al. Urinary symptoms in the community: how bothersome are they? Br J Urol 1994; 74: 551–555.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Koskimäki J, Hakama M, Huhtala H, Tammela TL . Effect of erectile dysfunction on frequency of intercourse: a population based prevalence study in Finland J Urol 2000; 164: 367–370.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Dunn KM, Croft PR, Hackett GI . Sexual problems: a study of the prevalence and need for health care in the general population Fam Pract 1998; 15: 519–524.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Dunn KM, Croft PR, Hackett GI . Association of sexual problems with social, psychological, and physical problems in men and women: a cross sectional population survey J Epidemiol Community Health 1999; 53: 144–148.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Laumann EO, Paik A, Rosen RC . Sexual dysfunction in the United States: prevalence and predictors JAMA 1999; 281: 537–544.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Fugl-Meyer AR . Sexual disabilities, problems and satisfaction in 18–74 year old Swedes Scand J Sexol 1999; 2: 79–105.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Helmius G . The Swedish sex survey. An introduction and remarks on changes in early sexual experiences Scand J Sexol 1998; 1: 63–70.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Tsukamoto T et al. Prevalence of prostatism in Japanese men in a community-based study with comparison to a similar American study J Urol 1995; 154: 391–395.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Masumori N et al. Decline of sexual function with age in Japanese men compared with American men-results of two community-based studies Urology 1999; 54: 335–344.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Pinnock CB, Stapleton AM, Marshall VR . Erectile dysfunction in the community: a prevalence study Med J Aust 1999; 171: 353–357.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Pinnock C, Marshall VR . Troublesome lower urinary tract symptoms in the community: a prevalence study Med J Aust 1997; 167: 72–75.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Parazzini F et al. Frequency and determinants of erectile dysfunction in Italy Eur Urol 2000; 37: 43–49.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Kongkanand A . Prevalence of erectile dysfunction in Thailand. Thai Erectile Dysfunction Epidemiological Study Group Int J Androl 2000; 23: 77–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Group TEDES . An epidemiological study of erectile dysfunction in Thailand (Part 1: Prevalence) J Med Assoc Thai 2000; 83: 872–879.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Ansong KS, Lewis C, Jenkins P, Bell J . Epidemiology of erectile dysfunction: a community-based study in rural New York State Ann Epidemiol 2000; 10: 293–296.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Braun M et al. Epidemiology of erectile dysfunction: results of the ‘Cologne Male Survey’ Int J Impot Res 2000; 12: 305–311.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Meuleman EJ et al. [Erectile dysfunction: prevalence and effect on the quality of life; Boxmeer study.] Erectiestoornis: prevalentie en invloed op de kwaliteit van leven; het Boxmeeronderzoek. (In Dutch.) Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2001; 145: 576–581.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Boyle P et al. The UrEpiK Study: a cross-sectional survey of benign prostatic hyperplasia, urinary incontinence and male erectile dysfunction, prostatitis and interstitial cystitis in the UK, France, the Netherlands and Korea J Epidemiol Biostat 1998; 3: 179–187.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Blanker MH et al. Strong effects of definition and nonresponse bias on prevalence rates of clinical benign prostatic byperplasia: the Krimpen study of male urogenital tract problems and general health status BJU Int 2000; 85: 665–671.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Blanker MH et al. Correlates for erectile and ejaculatory dysfunction in older Dutch men: a community-based study J Am Geriatr Soc 2001; 49: 436–442.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Blanker MH et al. Erectile and ejaculatory dysfunction in a community-based sample of men 50 to 78 years old: prevalence, concern, and relation to sexual activity Urology 2001; 57: 763–768.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Martin-Morales A et al. Prevalence and independent risk factors for erectile dysfunction in Spain: results of the Epidemiologia de la Disfuncion Erectil Masculina Study J Urol 2001; 166: 569–574.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Green JS et al. An investigation of erectile dysfunction in Gwent, Wales BJU Int 2001; 88: 551–553.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Gentili A, Mulligan T . Sexual dysfunction in older adults Clin Geriatr Med 1998; 14: 383–393.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Korenman SG . Clinical review 71: advances in the understanding and management of erectile dysfunction J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1995; 80: 1985–1988.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Monga M . The aging penis: erectile dysfunction Geriatr Nephrol Urol 1999; 9: 27–37.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Morley JE . Impotence Am J Med 1986; 80: 897–905.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Spector IP, Carey MP . Incidence and prevalence of the sexual dysfunctions: a critical review of the empirical literature Arch Sex Behav 1990; 19: 389–408.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Avis NE . Sexual function and aging in men and women: community and population-based studies J Gend Specif Med 2000; 3: 37–41.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Benet AE, Melman A . The epidemiology of erectile dysfunction Urol Clin N Am 1995; 22: 699–709.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Cohan P, Korenman SG . Erectile dysfunction J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2001; 86: 2391–2394.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Simons JS, Carey MP . Prevalence of sexual dysfunctions: results from a decade of research Arch Sex Behav 2001; 30: 177–219.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Oxman AD . Checklists for review articles Br Med J 1994; 309: 648–651.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Stroup DF et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group JAMA 2000; 283: 2008–2012.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. NIH Consensus Development Panel on Impotence. NIH Consensus Conference. Impotence JAMA 1993; 270: 83–90.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Mrs Arianne Verhagen for her methodological comments and suggestions on the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M H Blanker.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Prins, J., Blanker, M., Bohnen, A. et al. Prevalence of erectile dysfunction: a systematic review of population-based studies. Int J Impot Res 14, 422–432 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijir.3900905

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijir.3900905

Keywords

  • review
  • erectile dysfunction
  • quality assessment
  • prevalence
  • methodology

Further reading

Search

Quick links