Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Penile length is normal in most men seeking penile lengthening procedures

Abstract

Concerns over penile size and a desire for a longer penis are common in the male population. The number of male patients seeking an andrological consultation for the problem of ‘short penis’ is increasing. We looked at the numbers of patients presenting to a University andrology clinic over a 2-y period and correlated their perceived penis size with the accepted norms. Sixty-seven patients were evaluated with a median age of 27 (range 16–55) complaining of ‘short penis’ and requesting surgical correction. Clinical history, including the IIEF-5 questionnaire and an accurate physical examination were obtained. Data concerning measures of penile length and circumference were recorded in both the flaccid and fully stretched states and compared to the normal reference range as previously described in the nomogram we recently published (Eur Urol 2001; 39: 183–186.). All patients were also asked to estimate the length of a normal sized penis.

Fourty-four (65.7%) complained of a short penis only while flaccid, 22 patients (32.8%%) while both flaccid and erect, and only one patient (1.5%) was worried only by the erect length of the penis. Fifteen (22.4%) also complained about their penile circumference. Fifty-seven (85%) patients thought a ‘normal’ penile length should range from 10 to 17 cm (median value of 12 cm). Ten patients (15%) were not able to estimate ‘normal’ penile size. No patient was found to have a penile length under the 2.5 percentile according to our nomogram. Forty-two (62.7%) subjects recalled the problem starting in childhood, when they felt that their penis was smaller than their friends'. In 25 patients (37.3%) the problem started in the teenage years after seeing erotic images. Our data show that most men who seek penile lengthening surgery overestimate ‘normal’ penile length. In our series, none of the patients could be classified as having a severely short penis according to our nomogram and none had any anatomical penile abnormality. Most found the use of a nomgram to show them how they compared with other men helpful. We suggest that documentation of such a demonstration should be made for any man seeking an opinion on penile lengthening surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

$32.00

All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1
Figure 2

References

  1. Rosso C, Ostacoli L, Garbolino S, Furlan MP . The ‘small penis’: considerations about subjective penis deficiency Arch It Urol 1998 LXX: 227–233

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ponchietti R et al. Penile length and circumference. A study on 3300 young Italian men Eur Urol 2001 39: 183–186

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mondaini N et al. Andrologic pathology discovered during conscription screening: how many young men were unaware? Minerva Urol Nefrol 2000 52: 63–66 (In Italian)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Loeb H . Harnrohrencapacitat und tripperspritzen Munch Med Wochenschr 1899 46: 17

    Google Scholar 

  5. Schonfeld WA, Beebe GW . Normal growth and variation in the male genitalia from birth to maturity J Urol 1942 48: 759

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kinsey AC, Pomeroy WB, Martin CE . Sexual behaviour in the human male Saunders: Philadelphia 1948

  7. Bondil P et al. Clinical study of the longitudinal deformation of the flaccid penis and its variations with aging Eur Urol 1992 21: 248

    Google Scholar 

  8. Da Ros C et al. Caucasian penis: what is normal size? J Urol 1994 151: 323A

    Google Scholar 

  9. Richters J, Gerofi J, Donovan B . Are condoms the right size(s): a method for self measurements of erect penis Venerology 1995 8: 77–81

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wessells H, Lue TF, McAnich JW . Penile length in the flaccid and erect states: guidelines for penile augmentation J Urol 1996 156: 995

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Smith AM et al. Does penis size influence condom slippage and breakage? Int J STD AIDS 1998 9: 444–447

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Schneider T et al. Does penile size in younger men cause problems in condom use? A prospective measurement of penile dimensions in 111 young and 32 older men Urology 2001 57: 314–318

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chen J et al. Predicting penile size during erection Int J Impot Res 2000 12: 328–333

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mattelaer JJ . The phallus in art and culture In: EAU 2000, Edited by the Historical Committee of the European Association of Urology. The Netherlands pp 8–9

  15. Perovic SV, Djordjevic ML . Penile lengthening BJU Int 2000 86: 1028–1033

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N Mondaini.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mondaini, N., Ponchietti, R., Gontero, P. et al. Penile length is normal in most men seeking penile lengthening procedures. Int J Impot Res 14, 283–286 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijir.3900887

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijir.3900887

Keywords

  • penis
  • penile dimensions
  • short penis
  • penile length
  • nomogram

Further reading

Search

Quick links