Patients with Peyronie's disease usually present soon after the onset of the disease with penile pain and deformity when they develop an erection. They are middle-aged men and a palpable plaque is usually present. A good clinical history and examination are all that are necessary to manage most patients with Peyronie's disease. Further investigation is only required in those men with erectile dysfunction or where surgery is indicated.
La Peyronie's disease is characterised by palpable nodules in the penis which may be associated with pain and deformity on erection and a variable degree of erectile dysfunction. This paper will discuss each of these symptoms together with conditions that may be associated with its causation.
Duration of the disease at presentation
Table 2 shows the duration of symptoms before presentation in two series.2,4 Most patients (41%) presented within the first 6 months of the disease process and in one series4 the earliest presentation was 3 weeks after a penile injury and the longest was 17.5 y in a man who had remarried.
The time taken before the man visits his doctor will depend upon the severity of the symptoms, the functional impairment and cultural aspects of sexuality and seeking medical help.
The order in which the symptoms occur is shown in Table 3. The first symptom to be noticed is usually a penile deformity and this occurred in 52% of men. The first presenting symptom was penile pain in 40% and a lump in 21% of men; 10 men had more than one presenting symptom.
Penile deformity as shown in Table 4 is the most common (52%) first symptom of Peyronie's disease and was present in 94% of men.4 This figure is in keeping with the incidence of deformity found in other series which range from 50 to 91% of men.7,8,9 The bend is usually towards the left at first but by the time of presentation it is usually towards the belly (dorsal). The degree of curvature makes for difficulties in vaginal penetration as is shown in a series of patients undergoing a Nesbit operation to correct the deformity4,8,10 (Table 5). A ventral curvature makes for greater difficulty of penetration.
It is unusual for there to be any deformity of the flaccid penis. Some men complain of waisting of the penis at the site of the plaque and others of distal narrowing of the shaft. All these deformities are due to the loss of elasticity of the tunica albuginea due to the Peyronie's disease. In some men there may be complex curves in more than one direction: the shape of the erect penis being dependent on the extent of the Peyronie's plaques. The effect of the plaque is to cause an overall shortening of the penis and yet in reality relatively few men complain of penile shortening at the time of presentation. It is worthwhile drawing their attention to the fact that shortening has occurred before they undergo any surgery.
Pain is the next most common symptom of Peyronie's disease, is seldom severe, and rare when the penis is flaccid. Pain usually occurs during erection in the inflammatory stage of the disease and the absence of pain is often taken as an indication that the disease has stabilised. Plaque biopsy in 12 men with painful Peyronie's disease showed an inflammatory infiltrate to be present in eight.11
Pain rarely persists for more than 12 months12,13 and the incidence of pain varies between 20 and 70% in the literature4,7,9,10 and probably reflects the difference in the length of time that symptoms have been present at the time of presentation.
Lump or plaque
All patients have a plaque, or an area of fibrosis, and many patients are aware of it. Detection of the plaque on clinical examination is facilitated by stretching the penis with one hand and gently compressing the penile shaft between the fingers and thumb of the other hand. The location of the plaques are shown in Table 5. Most are situated dorsally but are evenly distributed throughout the length of the shaft. There is a tendency of the plaque to be first noticed in the distal third of the penis but then for the thickening to be felt progressively towards the base of the penis. It is rare to find a plaque in the perineum.14
The consistency of the plaque varies between the fleshy plaque found in the early stages of the disease, the plaque becomes firmer as the disease stabilises, and hard, calcified or even ossified plaques are found late in the disease process. Most patients are anxious that the lump in the penis is not a malignant tumour and need to be reassured about this. Primary or secondary tumours are rare and are seldom confused with Peyronie's disease.
Erectile dysfunction in Peyronie's disease may be due to one or more of four factors.15 In the first place the deformity may prevent intercourse but it has to be marked for this to occur. There is also the occasional patient in whom the pain is so troublesome that the man avoids having an erection and intercourse.
There is always a psychological element associated with Peyronie's disease and this gives rise to performance anxiety. It is seldom sufficient to prevent intercourse but does lead to a degree of erectile dysfunction.
The third cause for erectile dysfunction may result from a flail penis. This is the result of cavernous fibrosis which causes a localised absence of erection due to extensive, and often circumferential, fibrosis with distal flaccidity. The latter may also be due to interference with the distal blood supply.
The further investigation of erectile dysfunction in Peyronie's disease is discussed elsewhere in this supplement.
Symptoms associated with the causes of Peyronie's disease
As the aetiology of the condition is still not fully understood and as the pathophysiology has been discussed elsewhere, this section will be brief.
It is likely that Peyronie's disease is multifactorial in origin and there would seem to be an underlying genetic factor in some patients. A family history of Peyronie's disease is present in approximately 2% of men3,4 but there is undoubtedly under-reporting. Paget17 commented on the association between Dupuytren's contracture, a disease with a definite genetic factor and Peyronie's disease and the association was found in 6–16% of men.2,3,4,8
Penile trauma in the form of the classic faux pas de coite may result in Peyronie's disease,2,3,18 Lesser degrees of coital injury may cause scarring within the erectile tissue (cavernous fibrosis).3,18 Some authors10 believe that repeated minor trauma during coitus is sufficient to cause Peyronie's disease.
A history of urethral instrumentation was found in 9.5% of patients3 and whilst in some patients it may be the result of extravasation, stricture formation and ventral curvature, this is not the situation in most patients. Kelami19 drew attention to the urethral manipulation syndrome due to extravasation but in this condition there is often a complete resolution of the curvature.
The relationship of hypertension and atherosclerosis of Peyronie's disease is more difficult to quantify. This was discussed elsewhere.20 It may be that the vascular disease and Peyronie's disease are co-morbidities with aging.
Natural history of Peyronie's disease
There are few reports of untreated patients9,12,13,21,22,23 and the outcome is shown in Table 6. It is worth remembering that some patients are unaware that they are suffering from Peyronie's disease. In 1969, Smith24 found histological evidence of Peyronie's disease in 23% of 100 autopsies and Michal et al25 found that during phalloarteriography, 20% men had the typical deformity of Peyronie's disease of which the men were uanaware of.
The clinical features of Peyronie's disease are well recognised. An accurate clinical history and careful examination of the man is essential in the management of Peyronie's disease and further investigation may only be necessary in the small proportion of men who need to undergo surgical treatment.
Polkey JP, Castle WM . Induratio penis plastica Urol Cutan Rev 1928 32: 287–308
Chesney J . Peyronie's disease Br J Urol 1975 47: 209–218
Chilton CP, Castle WM, Westwood CA, Pryor JP . Factors associated in the aetiology of Peyronie's disease Br J Urol 1982 54: 748–750
Ralph DJ . Pathogenesis of Peyronie's disease MS Thesis, University of London 1996
Tefekli A et al. Peyronie's disease in men under age 40: characteristics and outcome Int J Impot Res 2001 13: 18–23
Lindsay MB et al. The incidence of Peyronie's disease in Rochester, Minnesota, 1959 through 1984 J Urol 1991 146: 1007–1009
Burford CE, Glen JE, Burfrod EW . Fibrous cavernositis: further observations with 31 additional cases J Urol 1943 49: 350–356
Bystrom J, Rubio C . Induratio penis plastica (Peyronie's disease): clinical features and etiology Scand J Urol Nephrol 1976 10: 12–20
Furlow WL, Swenson HE, Lee RE . Peyronie's disease: a study of its natural history and treatment with orthovoltage radiotherapy J Urol 1975 114: 69–71
Hinman F . Etiologic factors in Peyronie's disease Urol Int 1980 35: 407–413
Ralph DJ, Brooks MJ, Pryor JP . The treatment of Peyronie's disease with tamoxifen Br J Urol 1992 70: 648–651
Williams JL, Thomas GG . The natural history of Peyronie's disease J Urol 1970 103: 75–76
Gelbard MK, Dorey F, James K . The natural history of Peyronie's disease J Urol 1990 144: 1376–1379
Andrews OH et al. Atypical Peyronie's Disease BJU Int 1999 84: 537–538
Pryor JP . Peyronie's disease and impotence Acta Urol Belg 1988 56: 317–321
Gasior BL et al. Plaque associated corporal veno occlusive dysfunction in idiopathic Peyronie's disease: a pharmacocavernosometric and pharmacocavernosographic study World J Urol 1990 8: 90–96
Murphy LJT . History of urology part II Chapter 14 Charles Thomas: Springfield Illinois 1972 p 486
Pryor JP, Hill JT, Packham DA, Yates Bell AJ . Penile injuries with particular reference to the erectile tissue Br J Urol 1981 53: 42–46
Kelami A . Urethral manipulation syndrome Urol Int 1984 39: 352–354
Pryor JP . Peyronie's disease In: Hendry WF, ed Recent advances in urology Volume 4 Churchill Livingston: London 1987 pp 245–261
Dahl O . The treatment of plastic induration of the penis Acta Radiol 1954 41: 290
Ashworth A . Peyronie's disease Proc R Soc Med 1960 53: 692–694
Bystrom J et al. Induratio penis plastica (Peyronie's disease) Scand J Urol Nephrol 1972 6: 1–5
Smith BH . Subclinical Peyronie's disease Am J Clin Path 1969 52: 385–390
Michal V, Posipichal J, Blazkova J . Arteriography of the internal pudendal arteries and passive erection In: Zorgniotti AW, Rossi G, eds Vasculogenic impotence Charles Thomas: Springfield Illinois 1980 pp 169–179
About this article
Cite this article
Pryor, J., Ralph, D. Clinical presentations of Peyronie's disease. Int J Impot Res 14, 414–417 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijir.3900877
- Peyronie's disease
- penile pain
The Journal of Sexual Medicine (2021)
Fibroproliferative disorders and diabetes: Understanding the pathophysiologic relationship between Peyronie’s disease, Dupuytren disease and diabetes
Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism (2021)
International Journal of Impotence Research (2020)
Regional variation in the incidence and prevalence of Peyronie’s disease in the United States—results from an encounters and claims database
International Journal of Impotence Research (2020)
World Journal of Urology (2020)