Abstract
The response to Uprima® (apomorphine sublingual, (apo SL)) has been well documented in conventional clinical trials. Apo SL produces a predictable, consistent and durable response across a wide variety of patients. The positive reinforcement of a successful outcome should further support clinical benefit. Apo SL with its rapid onset affords a greater opportunity for spontaneity, which can be an important factor in influencing patient choice. It is recognised that patient counselling and the setting of realistic expectations are vital to a successful outcome. The impact of persisting with sequential treatment on outcome has been calculated from the clinical data. While apo SL is effective de novo in 50% of single doses, additional benefit is observed with repeat dosing. Full benefit may not be achieved until four or more treatments have been taken in an optimal setting. The data also confirm that 3 mg has superior activity. Patients should therefore be encouraged to try a minimum of 4 doses at 3 mg.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 8 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $32.38 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Heaton JPW. . Characterising the benefit of apomorphine as an optimised treatment for representative populations with erectile dysfunction. Int J Impot Res 2001 13: Suppl 3 S35–S39.
Von Keitz A. . The management of erectile dysfunction in the community. Int J Impot Res 2001 13: Suppl 3 S45–S51.
Dula E, Bukofzer S, Perdock R, George M. . Double-blind, crossover comparison of 3 mg apomorphine SL with placebo and with 4 mg apomorphine SL in male erectile dysfunction. Eur Urol 2001 39: 558–564.
Giuliano F, Allard J. . Dopamine and sexual function. Int J Impot Res 2001 13: Suppl 3 S18–S28.
Reynolds JN, Hyland BI, Wickens JR. . A cellular mechanism of reward-related learning. Nature 2001 413: 67–70.
Kirby R. . Clinical pharmacology of alpha1-adrenoceptor antagonists. Eur Urol 2001 36: Suppl 1 48–53.
El-Galley R, Rutland H, Talic R, Keane T, Clark H. . Long-term efficacy of sildenafil and tachyphylaxis effect. J Urol 2001 166: 927–931.
Mulhall JP, Bukofzer S, Edmonds AL, George M. . An open label, uncontrolled dose-optimization study of sublingual apomorphine in erectile dysfunction. Clin Ther 2001 23: 1260–1271.
Bukofzer S, Livesey N. . Apomorphine safety and tolerability. Int J Impot Res 2001 13: Suppl 3 S40–S44.
Fagan TC, Buttler S, Marbury T, Taylor A, Edmonds A. . Cardiovascular safety of sublingual apomorphine in patients on stable doses of antihypertensive agents and nitrates. Am J Cardiol 2001 88: 760–766.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Heaton, J., Dean, J. & Sleep, D. Sequential administration enhances the effect of apomorphine SL in men with erectile dysfunction. Int J Impot Res 14, 61–64 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijir.3900831
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijir.3900831
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
Unexpected nuances of the penoscrotal inflatable penile prosthesis
International Journal of Impotence Research (2022)
-
Penile implant infection prevention part 1: what is fact and what is fiction? Wilson’s Workshop #9
International Journal of Impotence Research (2021)
-
Salvaging the oral treatment failure patient
Current Sexual Health Reports (2006)
-
Clinical efficacy of Apomorphine SL in erectile dysfunction of diabetic men
International Journal of Impotence Research (2005)
-
Double-blind, placebo-controlled evaluation of the safety, pharmacokinetic properties and pharmacodynamic effects of intranasal PT-141, a melanocortin receptor agonist, in healthy males and patients with mild-to-moderate erectile dysfunction
International Journal of Impotence Research (2004)