Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Paper
  • Published:

Distal penile prosthesis extrusion: treatment with distal corporoplasty or Gortex windsock reinforcement

Abstract

Subcutaneous extrusion of penile prosthesis cylinders beneath the glans penis is an unusual but difficult complication of penile prosthesis. Without surgical repair, extrusion, infection, and corporeal fibrosis may ensue. Twenty-eight patients with distal corporeal extrusion were reviewed to identify the optimum treatment outcome for these penile prosthesis complications. Records of 28 men with subcutaneous distal penile prosthesis cylinder extrusion were reviewed. Mean age was 56.2 y. Etiology of erectile dysfunction was diabetes mellitus in 11, vasculogenic in 10, Peyronie's disease in five, radical pelvic surgery in five. Duration of penile prosthesis was 8–72 months (mean 42.6). No patient had penile prosthesis infection or device exposure through the skin. Distal corporoplasty was treated on 18/28 men using cylinder repositioning and direct tunica albuginea repair. Ten men underwent repair using a Gortex windsock. 8/18 corporoplasty and 6/10 windsock patients required glans fixation for treatment of hypermobile glans following cylinder relocation. In two patients with windsock repair, extrusion recurrence occurred 6 and 18 months following surgery and 1/6 had post operative infection requiring prosthesis removal. Mean surgical time for corporoplasty was 52.8 minutes while windsock reconstruction was 89.6 minutes. Distal subcutaneous penile prosthesis cylinder extrusion produces coital pain and predisposes to cylinder exposure and infection. Early repair with or without additional prosthetic materials will return penile prostheses to a normal functioning state. Distal corporoplasty with cylinder repositioning appears to be a simple, low morbidity solution to this difficult dilemma. Outcomes with distal corporoplasty result in better function, less pain, and fewer recurrences than Gortex windsock repair.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Carson CC, Mulchy JJ, Govier FE. . Efficacy, safety, and patient satisfaction outcomes of the AMS 700CX inflatable penile prosthesis: results of a long term multicenter study. J Urol 2000 164: 376–380.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Mulcahy JJ. . Distal corporoplasty for lateral extrusion of penile prosthesis cylinders. J Urol 1999 161: 193–195.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Carson CC. . Repair of distal extrusion of a penile prosthesis. Contemp Urol 1998 10: 13–17.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fishman IJ. . Corporal reconstruction for penile prosthesis implantation. Prob Urol 1993 7: 350–367.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hsu GL et al . Anatomy and strength of a tunica albuginea: its relevance to penile prosthesis extrusion. J Urol 1994 151: 1205–1208.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ball TP. . Surgical repair of penile SST deformity. Urology 1980 15: 603–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Carson CC. . Increased infection risks with corpus cavernosum reconstruction and penile prosthesis implantation with corporal fibrosis. Int J Impot Res 1996 8: Suppl S155.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Alter GJ et al . Use of prefabricated tunica vaginalis fascia flap to reconstruct the tunica albuginea after recurrent penile prosthesis extrusion. J Urol 1998 159: 128–132.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hellstrom WJ, Reddy S. . Application of pericardial grafts in the surgical treatment of Peyronies disease. J Urol 2000 163: 1445–1448.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Jarow JP. . Risk factors for penile prosthesis infection. J Urol 1996 156: 402–404.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hershorn S, Ordorica RC. . Penile prosthesis insertion with corporal reconstruction with synthetic vascular graft material. J Urol 1995 154: 80–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lewis RW, McLauren R. . Reoperation for penile prosthesis implantation. Prob Urol 1993 3: 381–401.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C C Carson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carson, C., Noh, C. Distal penile prosthesis extrusion: treatment with distal corporoplasty or Gortex windsock reinforcement. Int J Impot Res 14, 81–84 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijir.3900829

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijir.3900829

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links