INTRODUCTION

Primary neuroendocrine carcinomas of the thymus are unusual neoplasms that may take the form of either moderately and well-differentiated tumors (thymic carcinoid) or poorly differentiated neoplasms (small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the thymus). Thymic neuroendocrine carcinomas may display a diverse spectrum of differentiation. Tumors composed predominantly of spindle cells (1, 2), with mucinous stroma (3), with divergent cell lines including mesenchymal elements and amyloid-like stroma (4, 5, 6), and cases showing transitional areas with small cell carcinoma (7) have been described in the literature.

We present a study of 22 cases of another unusual morphologic variant of primary neuroendocrine carcinoma of the thymus characterized by prominent oncocytic features. The clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical, and differential diagnostic features of these lesions are discussed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-two cases of primary thymic neuroendocrine tumors of the thymus (thymic carcinoid) with prominent oncocytic features were identified from 146 cases of thymic neuroendocrine neoplasms found in the files of the Department of Pulmonary & Mediastinal Pathology, Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, Washington, DC, and the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Mount Sinai Medical Center of Greater Miami, Florida, over a 35-year period (1960 to 1995).

From 1 to 12 (average, 5) hematoxylin and eosin–stained sections were available for review in all cases. Histochemical stains for periodic acid-Schiff with and without diastase and mucicarmine were available in selected cases. For immunohistochemical studies, representative formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue sections were available in 12 cases and were incubated with antibodies against CAM 5.2 low-molecular-weight keratin (Becton-Dickinson, Mount View, CA), broad-spectrum keratin cocktail (Dako, Carpinteria, CA; 1:3000), chromogranin (Enzo, New York, NY), synaptophysin (Dako; 1:20), Leu-7 (Dako), and p53 (Biogenex, San Ramon, CA; 1:10) by the avidin-biotin peroxidase complex technique. Sections stained with antibodies for CAM 5.2, chromogranin, and p53 were treated using a microwave epitope retrieval technique with 10 mmol/L citrate buffer, pH 6.0, at 700 watts for 20 min. Nonimmune rabbit and mouse serum was substituted for negative controls. Appropriate positive controls were run concurrently for every antibody tested.

For clinical follow-up, a questionnaire was developed and mailed to the respective contributing physicians or tumor registries over a period of 24 months. Information requested included gender, age, presenting symptoms and signs, significant history (namely, the existence of a similar tumor within the lung or extrathoracic area), gross findings, treatment, and follow-up. Responses to the questionnaire were obtained in 14 cases.

RESULTS

Clinical Features

The patients were 17 men and 5 women (M:F ratio, 3:1) between the ages of 26 to 84 years (median: 55 years). Nine patients were asymptomatic, and the tumors were discovered on routine medical examination. Four patients presented with symptoms of chest pain, two with weight loss, and three with endocrine abnormalities, including multiple endocrine neoplasia I syndrome (MEN-I) in two and Cushing’s syndrome in one. In four patients, no information regarding presenting or associated symptoms could be obtained. All of the tumors were localized to the anterior mediastinum at the time of diagnosis and were treated by surgical excision. None of the patients had any history or clinical evidence of tumor elsewhere.

Gross Features

The tumors were described as fairly well-circumscribed soft masses measuring from 3 to 20 cm in greatest diameter. On cut section, the tumors showed a homogeneous, light tan to brown surface with focal areas of hemorrhage.

Histopathologic Features

On scanning magnification, the tumors were composed of a monotonous cellular proliferation showing a vaguely “organoid” appearance, with the formation of discrete nests of tumor cells separated by thin fibroconnective tissue septa or forming cords and ribbons that imparted the lesions with a trabecular growth pattern (Fig. 1). Occasionally, the cells were arranged in a haphazard fashion without any particular pattern and were embedded in a loose fibromyxoid stroma. On higher magnification, the tumor cell population was composed of large- to medium-sized, round to polygonal cells with abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm with a granular appearance, round to oval nuclei, and occasionally prominent nucleoli (Fig. 2). In areas, the oncocytic tumor cells were seen to merge with foci showing more conventional, nononcocytic cytologic features of carcinoid tumors. Mitotic figures were present in all cases and varied from 2 to fewer than 10 per 10 high-power fields (HPF). The tumors were divided into well-differentiated tumors (low grade) and moderately differentiated tumors (intermediate grade) on the basis of their cytologic features and mitotic rate. Fourteen cases showed features of well-differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma and were characterized by relatively bland round to oval nuclei with occasionally prominent nucleoli, focal areas of comedonecrosis, and low mitotic activity (average, 2 to 3 mitotic figures/10 HPF) (Fig. 3). Eight cases showed features of moderately differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma and were characterized by more pronounced nuclear pleomorphism, with enlarged and hyperchromatic nuclei, occasional bizarre nuclear shapes, nucleolar prominence, and higher mitotic rates (4 to 10 mitotic figures/10 HPF) (Fig. 4). Small foci of comedonecrosis were seen in all cases; however, the areas of necrosis were more numerous and extensive in the moderately differentiated tumors. Foci of dystrophic calcifications were present in 12 cases; the dystrophic calcifications generally were associated with areas of necrosis. In three cases, focal areas composed predominantly of spindle cells with elongated nuclei and scant eosinophilic cytoplasm and inconspicuous nucleoli were also present. Periodic acid-Schiff and mucicarmine stains were negative in the tumor cells in all cases.

FIGURE 1
figure 1

A, low-power view of an oncocytic neuroendocrine carcinoma (carcinoid). Note the well demarcation from the uninvolved thymic tissue. B, closer view of the neoplastic proliferation showing ribbons of cells with a vague nesting pattern.

FIGURE 2
figure 2

Intermediate-power view of an oncocytic neuroendocrine neoplasm showing homogeneous cell population composed of cells with moderate amounts of eosinophilic cytoplasm. Note the absence of cellular atypia and mitotic activity.

FIGURE 3
figure 3

High-power view of an oncocytic neoplasm showing mild cellular atypia. A mitotic figure is observed at the center of the field.

FIGURE 4
figure 4

Closer areas of an oncocytic neoplasm showing more cellular atypia and necrosis toward the periphery of the tumor.

Immunohistochemical Features

Twelve cases were studied using antibodies for CAM 5.2, keratin cocktail, chromogranin, synaptophysin, Leu-7, and p53. Ten cases showed positive staining in the tumor cells for keratin, 11 showed positive staining for Leu-7, 8 for chromogranin, and 7 for synaptophysin. All cases showed positive staining for CAM 5.2 antibodies. It is interesting that only one case showed focal positive staining for p53 antibody.

Follow-Up

Clinical follow-up information was obtained in 14 patients over a period of 2 to 11 years (median, 6 years). Ten patients were alive and well from 2 to 11 years after diagnosis, whereas 4 patients had died of tumor over a period of 4 to 11 years. No follow-up information could be obtained for eight patients. Three of the four patients who had died had moderately differentiated tumors with high mitotic rates and marked cytologic atypia, whereas 11 of the 14 patients who were alive and well had well-differentiated tumors with low mitotic rates and mild nuclear atypical features. The three patients with associated MEN-I or Cushing’s syndrome were alive at the time of follow-up; the tumors in these patients corresponded to well-differentiated (low-grade) neuroendocrine carcinomas.

DISCUSSION

Primary thymic neuroendocrine carcinomas (thymic carcinoids) are unusual neoplasms that account for 2 to 4% of all mediastinal tumors (8, 9). Rosai and Higa (10) are credited with the first description of such tumors in the thymic region. These authors also were the first to point out that thymic tumors previously reported in association with Cushing’s syndrome most likely represented neuroendocrine tumors (11, 12, 13). Numerous reports of similar lesions in the thymus have been presented in the form of case reports or small series of cases (2, 5, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53).

The term carcinoid tumor was introduced in the early 1900s by Obendorfer (54) for a group of tumors of the small intestine that behaved better than conventional carcinomas. Since then, this term has been widely applied to a variety of well-differentiated neuroendocrine neoplasms at various sites, including the gastrointestinal tract, lung, and thymus (9, 55, 56). Duh et al. (8) stated that thymic carcinoids are clinically malignant in approximately 82% of cases, whereas bronchial carcinoids are malignant in only 26% of cases. Also, Dusmet and McKneally (57) stated that although bronchial carcinoids may not influence life expectancy, thymic carcinoids, regardless of their histopathologic features, have a poor prognosis. Therefore, it may be argued that thymic carcinoids should be coded as “atypical” following the designation given by Arrigoni et al. (58, 59) to similar tumors in the lung. Conversely, there are those who consider the term carcinoid anachronistic and would rather classify such tumors within the spectrum of neuroendocrine carcinomas (60). We fully support the latter philosophy and believe that thymic carcinoids should be regarded as belonging within the spectrum of neuroendocrine carcinomas and that they should be further categorized on the basis of their cytologic features into well-, moderately, and poorly differentiated tumors.

Primary thymic neuroendocrine carcinomas may display a broad spectrum of differentiation and morphologic appearances, ranging from well-differentiated lesions with the classical features of carcinoid tumors elsewhere to poorly differentiated neoplasms indistinguishable from small cell carcinomas of the lung. The well-differentiated tumors, in particular, have shown a tendency to adopt unusual cytologic appearances and growth patterns that may introduce difficulties for diagnosis, including prominent spindling of the tumor cells, a small cell pattern reminiscent of lymphoma, and tumors with a variety of stromal changes that may raise the possibility of alternative conditions in the differential diagnosis (61). In the present study, we describe another unusual morphologic variant of primary neuroendocrine carcinoma of the thymus that may also cause difficulties for diagnosis because of its prominent oncocytic features. It is interesting that primary thymic neuroendocrine neoplasms that show such features have been only rarely reported (62). This may be because these tumors are underrecognized rather than actually rare. In the present study, the tumors were identified from among 146 cases of primary neuroendocrine carcinomas of the thymus, accounting for approximately 15% of the total of primary thymic neuroendocrine carcinomas (carcinoids) reviewed from our files over a 35-year period.

In our study, we were able to demonstrate that oncocytic carcinoid tumors are also associated with endocrinopathies and that they may also show different degrees of cellular atypia or differentiation. For instance, in 14 of our cases, the cellular atypia was mild and the mitotic count was in the range of 2 to 3 mitotic figures/10 HPF. Although foci of comedonecrosis were evident in all cases, they were usually focal rather than extensive in the well-differentiated tumors. Therefore, we classified these tumors as well-differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas with oncocytic features. However, eight cases showed more pronounced cellular atypia with irregular nuclei, prominent nucleoli, and an increase in mitotic activity in the range of 4 to 10 mitoses/10 HPF. Moderately differentiated tumors correspond to moderately differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas with oncocytic features. The majority of oncocytic neuroendocrine tumors in our study belonged to the better differentiated end of the spectrum of neuroendocrine carcinoma; oncocytic features in thymic carcinoids may therefore be associated with a better prognosis. We also noted that the association of Cushing’s syndrome or MEN-I did not alter the behavior of these tumors.

The differential diagnosis of oncocytic neuroendocrine carcinomas of the thymus includes metastatic carcinomas, particularly from breast and kidney, metastatic malignant melanoma, malignant mesothelioma, paraganglioma, and parathyroid adenomas (63, 64). The last two tumors, in particular, also show evidence of neuroendocrine differentiation using neuroendocrine markers such as chromogranin and synaptophysin and may also display prominent oncocytic features. Mediastinal paragangliomas can also closely resemble oncocytic carcinoids histologically by virtue of their prominent nesting pattern (Zellballen). However, paragangliomas are usually negative for epithelial markers such as keratin or CAM 5.2 low-molecular-weight keratin (63). In addition, paragangliomas may show marked cellular pleomorphism with nucleomegaly, but mitotic activity and areas of necrosis are rarely seen. Parathyroid adenomas can also show granular or densely eosinophilic cytoplasm and display a prominent organoid architecture; however, these tumors will be strongly periodic acid-Schiff positive, whereas carcinoids will show negative reaction using periodic acid-Schiff histochemical stain. In addition, immunohistochemical stains for parathyroid hormone will be of value in equivocal cases, such as in small thoracoscopic biopsies in which the distinction may not be so easy on the basis of routine microscopy. Other conditions that may enter in the differential diagnosis include metastatic carcinomas with prominent oncocytic changes, such as breast cancer or renal cell carcinoma, malignant mesothelioma involving the mediastinal pleura, and metastatic malignant melanoma. These can easily be distinguished from oncocytic carcinoids by a combination of immunohistochemical stains and a careful clinical history. In general, the majority of such conditions will show negative results with neuroendocrine markers such as chromogranin and synaptophysin.

We have presented 22 cases of neuroendocrine carcinoma of the thymus with prominent oncocytic features. The majority of cases in our study corresponded to low-grade, well-differentiated tumors (low mitotic activity, mild cellular atypia) that followed a favorable clinical course after surgical excision. Attention to cytologic features of atypia and mitotic activity are of importance, however, to identify cases that may follow a more aggressive biologic behavior.