Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Commentary
  • Published:

Nepotism and sexism in peer-review

In the first-ever analysis of peer-review scores for postdoctoral fellowship applications, the system is revealed as being riddled with prejudice. The policy of secrecy in evaluation must be abandoned.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout


  1. Widnall, S. E. Science 241, 1740–1745 (1988).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Cole, S., Cole, J. R. & Simon, G. A. Science 214, 881–886 (1981).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Long, J. S. Social Forces 71, 159–178 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sonnert, G. Social Stud. Sci. 25, 35–55 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sonnert, G. & Holton, G. Am. Sci. 84, 63–71 (1996).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Glantz, S. A. & Bero, L. A. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 272, 114–116 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ernst, E., Resch, K. L. & Uher, E. M. Ann. Intern. Med. 116, 958 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Forsdyke, D. R. FASEB J. 7, 619–621 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Calza, L. & Gerbisa, S. Nature 374, 492 (1995).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Perez-Enciso, M. Nature 378, 760 (1995).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Goldberg, P. Trans-Action 5, 28–30 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Nieva, V. F. & Gutek, B. A. Acad. Manag. Rev. 5, 267–276 (1980).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. O'Leary, V. E. & Wallston, B. S. Rev. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 2, 9–43 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Frieze, I. H. in Women and Achievement: Social and Motivational Analyses (eds Mednick, M. T., Tangri, S. S. & Hoffman, L. W.) 158–171 (Hemisphere, Washington DC, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wennerås, C., Wold, A. Nepotism and sexism in peer-review. Nature 387, 341–343 (1997).

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:

This article is cited by


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing