Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Genetic instability in colorectal cancers


It has long been considered that genetic instability is an integral component of human neoplasia1–3. In a small fraction of tumours, mismatch repair deficiency leads to a microsatellite instability at the nucleotide sequence level4,5. In other tumours, an abnormal chromosome number (aneuploidy) has suggested an instability, but the nature and magnitude of the postulated instability is a matter of conjecture. We show here that colorectal tumours without microsatellite instability exhibit a striking defect in chromosome segregation, resulting in gains or losses in excess of 10 –2 per chromosome per generation. This form of chromosomal instability reflected a continuing cellular defect that persisted throughout the lifetime of the tumour cell and was not simply related to chromosome number. While microsatellite instability is a recessive trait6,7, chromosomal instability appeared to be dominant. These data indicate that persistent genetic instability may be critical for the development of all colorectal cancers, and that such instability can arise through two distinct pathways.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.


  1. 1

    Loeb, L. Mutator phenotype may be required for multistage carcinogenesis. Cancer Res. 51, 3075–3079 (1991).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Hartwell, L. Defects in a cell cycle checkpoint may be responsible for the genomic instability of cancer cells. Cell 71, 543–546 (1992).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Heim, S. & Mitelman, F. Cancer Cytogenetics (Liss, New York, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Marra, G. & Boland, C. R. Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer: the syndrome, the genes, and historical perspectives. J. Natl Cancer Inst. 87, 1114–1125 (1995).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Bhattacharyya, N. P., Skandalis, A., Ganesh, A., Groden, J. & Meuth, M. Mutator phenotypes in human colorectal carcinoma cell lines. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 87, 7555–7559 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Koi, M. et al. Human chromosome 3 corrects mismatch repair deficiency and microsatellite instability and reduces N-methyl-N’-N-nitrosoguanidine tolerance in colon tumor cells with homozygous hMLHl mutation. Cancer Res. 54, 4302–4312 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Casares, S., lonov, Y., Ge, H.-Y., Standbridge, E. & Perucho, M. The microsatellite mutator phenotype of colon cancer cells is often recessive. Oncogene 11, 2303–2310 (1995).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Lichter, P., Boyle, A. L., Cremer, T. & Ward, D. Analysis of genes and chromosomes by nonisotopic in situ hybridization. Gen. Anal. Tech. Appl. 8, 24–35 (1991).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Hartwell, L., Weinert, T., Kadyk, L. & Garvik, B. Cell cycle checkpoints, genomic integrity, and cancer. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 59, 259–263 (1994).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Mayer, V. W. & Aguilera, A. High levels of chromosome instability in polyploids of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mut. Res. 231, 177–186 (1990).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Shackney, S. et al. Model for the genetic evolution of human solid tumors. Cancer Res. 49, 3344–3354 (1989).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Tanaka, K. et al. Suppression of tumorigenicity in human colon carcinoma cells by introduction of normal chromosome 5 or 18. Nature 349, 340–342 (1991).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Goyette, M. C. et al. Progression of colorectal cancer is associated with multiple tumor suppressor gene defects but inhibition of tumorigeneity is accomplished by correction of any single defect via chromosome transfer. Mol. Cell. Biol. 12, 1387–1395 (1992).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Rodrigues, N. R. et al. p53 mutations in colorectal cancer. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 87, 7555–7559 (1990).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Shibata, D., Peinado, M. A., lonov, Y., Malkhosyan, S. & Perucho, M. Genomic instability in repeated sequences is an early somatic event in colorectal tumorigenesis that persists after transformation. Nature Genet. 6, 273–281 (1994).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Huang, J. et al. APC mutations in colorectal tumors with mismatch repair deficiency. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 93, 9049–9054 (1996).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Aaltonen, L. A. et al. Clues to the pathogenesis of familial colorectal cancer. Science 260, 812–816 (1993).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    Bocker, M. et al. Genomic instability in colorectal carcinomas: comparison of different evaluation methods and their biological significance. J. Path. 179, 15–19 (1996).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    Livingston, L. R. et al. Altered cell cycle arrest and gene amplification potential accompany loss of wild-type p53. Cell 70, 923–935 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    Yin, Y., Tainsky, M. A., Bischoff, F. Z., Strong, L. C. & Wahl, G. M. Wild-type p53 restores cell cycle control and inhibits gene amplification in cells with mutant p53 alleles. Cell 70, 937–948 (1992).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    Cottu, P. H. et al. Inverse correlation between RER+ status and p53 mutation in colorectal cancer cell lines. Oncogene 13, 2727–2730 (1996).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22

    Papadopoulos, N. et al. Mutation of the mutL homolog in hereditary colon cancer. Science 263, 1625–1629 (1994).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    Papadopoulos, N. et al. Mutations of GTBP in genetically unstable cells. Science 268, 1915–1917 (1995).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24

    Umar, A. et al. Defective mismatch repair in extracts of colorectal and endometrial cancer lines exhibiting microsatellite instability. J. Biol. Chem. 269, 14367–14370 (1994).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25

    Hollstein, M. et al. Database of p53 gene somatic mutations in human tumors and cell lines. Nucleic Acids Res. 22, 3551–3555 (1994).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. 26

    Ried, T. et al. Specific metaphase and interphase detection of the breakpoint region in 8q24 of Burkitt lymphoma cells by triple-color fluorescence in situ hybridization. Genes Chrom. Cancer 4, 69–74 (1992).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27

    Lichter, P. & Cremer, T. in Human Cytogenetics: A Practical Approach (eds Rooney, D. E. & Czepulkowski, B. H.) 157–192 (IRL, Oxford, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  28. 28

    Lengauer, C. et al. Large-scale isolation of human Ip36-specific PI clones and their use for fluorescence in situ hybridization. Gen. Anal Tech. Appl. 11, 140–147 (1994).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. 29

    Ried, T., Baldini, A., Rand, T. C. & Ward, D. C. Simultaneous visualization of seven different DNA probes by in situ hybridization using combinatorial fluorescence and digital imaging microscopy. Proc. NatlAcad. Sci. USA 89, 1388–1392 (1992).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information



Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lengauer, C., Kinzler, K. & Vogelstein, B. Genetic instability in colorectal cancers. Nature 386, 623–627 (1997).

Download citation

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing