Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Evidence against a dedicated system for word learning in children


Children can learn aspects of the meaning of a new word on the basis of only a few incidental exposures and can retain this knowledge for a long period—a process dubbed 'fast mapping'1–8. It is often maintained that fast mapping is the result of a dedicated language mechanism, but it is possible that this same capacity might apply in domains other than language learning. Here we present two experiments in which three- and four-year-old children and adults were taught a novel name and a novel fact about an object, and were tested on their retention immediately, after a 1-week delay or after a 1-month delay. Our findings show that fast mapping is not limited to word learning, suggesting that the capacity to learn and retain new words is the result of learning and memory abilities that are not specific to language.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.


  1. 1

    Carey, S. & Bartlett, E. Child Lang. Dev. 15, 17–29 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Carey, S. in Linguistic Theory and Psychological Reality (eds Halle, M., Bresnan, J. & Miller, G. A.) 264–293 (MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Markman, E. M. Categorization and Naming in Children: Problems of Induction 1–250 (MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Baldwin, D. A. Child Dev. 62, 875–890 (1991).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Dickinson, D. K. Appl. Psycholing. 5, 359–373 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Dollaghan, C. A. J. Speech Hear. Disord. 52, 218–222 (1987).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Heibeck, T. H. & Markman, E. M. Child. Dev. 58, 1021–1034 (1987).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Rice, M. L., Buhr, J. C. & Nemeth, M. J. Speech Hear. Disord. 55, 33–42 (1990).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Newport, E. Cogn. Sci. 14, 11–28 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Chomsky, N. Rules and Representations 1–299 (Blackwell, Oxford, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Pinker, S. The Language Instinct 1–494 (Morrow, New York, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Curtiss, S. in Interaction in Human Development (eds Bornstein, M. & Bruner, J.) 105–137 (LEA, Hillsdale, New Jersey, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Neville, H. J. in Brain Maturation and Cognitive Development (eds Gibson, K. R. & Peterson, A. C.) 355–380 (Aldine de Gruyter, Hawthorne, New York, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Bloom, P. & Kelemen, D. Cognition 56, 1–30 (1995).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Markman, E. M. & Wachtel, G. F. Cogn. Psychol. 20, 121–157 (1988).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information



Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Markson, L., Bloom, P. Evidence against a dedicated system for word learning in children. Nature 385, 813–815 (1997).

Download citation

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing