Repeated stimulation of hippocampal neurons can induce an immediate and prolonged increase in synaptic strength that is called long-term potentiation (LTP)—the primary cellular model of memory in the mammalian brain1. An early phase of LTP (lasting less than three hours) can be dissociated from late-phase LTP by using inhibitors of transcription and translation2–8. Because protein synthesis occurs mainly in the cell body9–12, whereas LTP is input-specific, the question arises of how the synapse specificity of late LTP is achieved without elaborate intracellular protein trafficking. We propose that LTP initiates the creation of a short-lasting protein-synthesis-independent 'synaptic tag' at the potentiated synapse which sequesters the relevant protein(s) to establish late LTP. In support of this idea, we now show that weak tetanic stimulation, which ordinarily leads only to early LTP, or repeated tetanization in the presence of protein-synthesis inhibitors, each results in protein-synthesis-dependent late LTP, provided repeated tetanization has already been applied at another input to the same population of neurons. The synaptic tag decays in less than three hours. These findings indicate that the persistence of LTP depends not only on local events during its induction, but also on the prior activity of the neuron.
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $3.90 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Rent or Buy article
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
Bliss. T. V. P. & Collingridge, G. L. Nature 361, 31–39 (1993).
Krug, M., Lössner, B. & Ott, T. Brain Res. Bull. 13, 39–42 (1984).
Frey, U., Krug, M., Reymann, K. G. & Matthies, H. Brain Res. 452, 57–65 (1988).
Fazeli, M. S., Errington, M. L., Dolphin, A. C. & Bliss, T. V. Brain Res. 473, 51–59 (1988).
Otani, S., Marshall, C. J., Tate, W. P., Goddard, G. V. & Abraham, W. C. Neuroscience 28, 519–526 (1989).
Fazeli, M. S., Corbet, J., Dunn, M. J., Dolphin, A. C. & Bliss, T. V. P. J. Neurosci. 13, 1346–1353 (1993).
Nguyen, P. V., Abel, T. & Kandel, E. R. Science 265, 1104–1107 (1994).
Frey, U., Frey, S., Schollmeier, F. & Krug, M. J. Physiol. 490, 703–711 (1996).
Link, W. et al. Proc. Nat; Acad. Sci. USA 92, 5734–5738 (1995).
Davis, L., Banker, G. A. & Steward, O. Nature 330, 477–479 (1987).
Kleiman, R., Banker, G. & Steward, O. Neuron 5, 821–830 (1990).
Kang, H. & Schuman, E. M. Science 273, 1402–1406 (1996).
Huang, Y. Y. & Kandel, E. R. Learning & Memory 1, 74–82 (1994).
Frey, U., Schollmeier, K., Reymann, K. G. & Seidenbecher, T. Neuroscience 67, 799–807 (1995).
Steward, O. & Falk, P. M. J. Neurosci. 6, 412–423 (1986).
Lovinger, D. M. & Routtenberg, A. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 400, 321–333 (1988).
Stäubli, U. & Chun, D. J. Neurosci. 16, 853–860 (1996).
Hebb, D. O. The Organization of Behaviour (Wiley, New York, 1949).
Larson, J. & Lynch, G. Science 232, 985–988 (1986).
Diamond, D. M., Dunwiddie, T. V. & Rose, G. M. J. Neurosci. 8, 4079–4088 (1988).
Malenka, R. C. Neuron 6, 53–60 (1991).
Abraham, W. C. & Bear, M. F. Trends Neurosci. 19, 126–130 (1996).
Rawlins, J. N. P. Behav. Brain Sci. 479–528 (1985).
Squire, L. R. & Davis, H. P. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 21, 323–356 (1981).
Brown, R. & Kulik, J. Cognition 5, 73–99 (1977).
Stanton, P. K. & Sarvey, J. M. J. Neurosci. 4, 3080–3088 (1984).
About this article
Cite this article
Frey, U., Morris, R. Synaptic tagging and long-term potentiation. Nature 385, 533–536 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1038/385533a0
Cell & Bioscience (2021)
Further evidence that CP-AMPARs are critically involved in synaptic tag and capture at hippocampal CA1 synapses
Molecular Brain (2021)
Scientific Reports (2021)
Nature Communications (2021)
Nature Neuroscience (2021)