Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

The C5a chemoattractant receptor mediates mucosal defence to infection

Abstract

A FAMILY of G-protein-eoupled chemoattractant receptors is known to mediate the transport and activation of neutrophils and macrophages. This family includes receptors for chemokines, such as interleukin-8, bacterial formylated peptides, platelet-activating factor, leukotriene B4, and the complement anaphyla-toxins1–3. The apparent redundancy of these receptors suggests that they have an important underlying role in host defence. To isolate the contribution of particular molecules, we disrupted a gene that encodes a single chemoattractant receptor. Here we show that mice deficient in the chemoattractant C5a receptor, in comparison to their wild-type littermates, were unable to clear intrapulmonary-instilled Pseudomonas aeruginosa, despite a marked increase in neutrophil influx, and succumbed to pneumonia. These C5a-receptor-deficient mice challenged with sub-lethal inocula of Pseudomonas become superinfected with secondary bacterial strains. We conclude that the C5a receptor has a non-redundant function, and is required for mucosal host defence in the lung.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gerard, N. P. & Gerard, C. Nature 349, 614–617 (1991).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Gerard, C. & Gerard, N. P. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 12, 775–808 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Cacalano, G. et al. Science 265, 682–684 (1994).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gerard, C. et al. J. Immunol. 149, 2600–2606 (1992).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Haviland, D. L. et al. J. Immunol. 154, 1861–1869 (1995).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kudoh, I., Wiener-Kronish, J. P., Hashimoto, S., Pittet, J. F. & Frank, D. Am. J. Physiol. 267, 551–556 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Williams, J. C., Lucas, B. J., Knee, C., Renzetti, M. & Donahue, J. Exp. Lung. Res. 18, 155–171 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Frenette, P. S., Mayadas, T. N., Rayburn, H., Hynes, R. O. & Wagner, D. D. Cell 84, 563–574 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Czuprynski, C. J., Henson, P. M. & Campbell, P. A. J. Leukoc. Biol. 35, 193–208 (1984).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Mosser, D. M. Immunol. Ser. 60, 99–114 (1994).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Berger, M., Sorensen, R. U., Tosi, M. F., Dearborn, D. G. & Döring, G. J. Clin. Invest. 84, 1302–1313 (1989).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hornick, D. B. & Fick, R. B. J. J. Clin. Invest. 86, 1285–1292 (1990).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Larsen, G. L., Mitchell, B. C., Harper, T. B. & Henson, P. M. Am. Rev. Resp. Dis. 126, 306–311 (1982).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Toews, G. B., Vial, W. C. & Hansen, E. J. Infect. Immun. 50, 207–212 (1985).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Cerquetti, M. C., Sordelli, D. O., Bellanti, J. A. & Hooke, A. M. Infect. Immun. 52, 853–857 (1986).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Bozic, C. R. et al. J. Immunol. 154, 6048–6057 (1995).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bradley, P. P., Priebat, D. A., Christensen, R. D. & Rothstein, G. J. Invest. Dermatol. 78, 206–213 (1982).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Höpken, U., Lu, B., Gerard, N. et al. The C5a chemoattractant receptor mediates mucosal defence to infection. Nature 383, 86–89 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1038/383086a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/383086a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing