Letter | Published:

Minimal cost per twitch in rattlesnake tail muscle

Nature volume 383, pages 7172 (05 September 1996) | Download Citation

Subjects

Abstract

SOUND production is one of the most energetically costly activities in animals1. Minimizing contraction costs is one means of achieving the high activation rates necessary for sound production (20–550 Hz) (refs 1–3) without exceeding energy supplies. Rattlesnakes produce a sustained, high-frequency warning sound by extremely rapid contraction of their tailshaker muscles (20–90 Hz) (refs 4,5). The ATP cost per twitch is only 0.015 μmol ATP per g muscle per twitch during rattling, as measured by in vivo magnetic resonance. The reduced volume density of myofibre (32%) in tailshaker muscle is consistent with contraction cost being minimized (crossbridge cycling), in contrast to the contractile costs of vertebrate locomotory and asynchronous insect flight muscle. Thus tailshaker muscle is an example of sound-producing muscle designed for 'high frequency, minimal cost'. The high rates of rattling are achieved by minimizing contractile use of ATP, which reduces the cost per twitch to among the lowest found for striated muscle.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    & Physiol. Zool. 50, 31–42 (1977).

  2. 2.

    & J. Exp. Biol. 118, 185–208 (1985).

  3. 3.

    Am. Zool. 34, 625–643 (1994).

  4. 4.

    , & J. Exp. Biol. 199.02, 351–358 (1996).

  5. 5.

    & Science 119, 442–443 (1954).

  6. 6.

    , , & Tissue & Cell 12, 323–334 (1980).

  7. 7.

    , & J. Appl. Physiol. 69, 968–972 (1990).

  8. 8.

    , & J. Physiol. (Lond.) 465, 203–222 (1993).

  9. 9.

    & NMR Biomed. 6, 32–38 (1993).

  10. 10.

    in Handbook of Physiology, Skeletal Muscle (eds Peachey, L., Adrian, R. & Geiger, S.) 487–506 (Williams and Wilkinson, Baltimore, 1993).

  11. 11.

    & J. Exp. Biol. 76, 11–25 (1978).

  12. 12.

    & in Energy Transformations in Cells and Organisms (Proc. 10th Conf. Eur. Soc. Comp. Physiol. Biochem.) (eds Wieser, W. & Gnaiger, E.) 200–210 (Georg Thieme, Stuttgart, 1989).

  13. 13.

    , & J. Exp. Biol. 116, 271–289 (1985).

  14. 14.

    & Science 268, 87–90 (1995).

  15. 15.

    & J. Physiol. (Lond.) 442, 413–429 (1991).

  16. 16.

    Exercise Sport Sci. Rev. 13, 33–74 (1985).

  17. 17.

    , , , & Respir. Physiol. 69, 27–46 (1987).

  18. 18.

    J. Exp. Biol. 160, 71–91 (1991).

  19. 19.

    J. Exp. Biol. 117, 357–368 (1985).

  20. 20.

    & J. Exp. Biol. 183, 101–113 (1993).

  21. 21.

    , , , & Nature 378, 209–212 (1995).

  22. 22.

    & J. Exp. Biol. 91, 219–237 (1981).

  23. 23.

    , & J. Exp. Zool. 194, 379–408 (1975).

  24. 24.

    et al. J. Biol. Chem. 261, 14420–14429 (1986).

  25. 25.

    & J. Biol. Chem. 267, 14084–14093 (1992).

  26. 26.

    & J. Clin. Invest. 85, 843–852 (1990).

  27. 27.

    , , & Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 86, 1583–1587 (1989).

  28. 28.

    & J. Physiol. (Lond.) 254, 711–727 (1976).

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiology and The Center for Bioengineering, Box 357115, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, Washington 98195–7115, USA

    • Kevin E. Conley
  2. Physiology and Functional Morphology Group, Department of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona 86011–5640, USA

    • Stan L. Lindstedt

Authors

  1. Search for Kevin E. Conley in:

  2. Search for Stan L. Lindstedt in:

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/383071a0

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.