The philosophy of science is not independent of the way research is organized. Can scientists produce objective knowledge in a world where their research is increasingly directed towards making money or meeting social needs?
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Relevant articles
Open Access articles citing this article.
-
Objectivity for the research worker
European Journal for Philosophy of Science Open Access 08 September 2021
-
Fake facts and alternative truths in medical research
BMC Medical Ethics Open Access 27 January 2018
-
The role of science in fisheries management in Europe: from Mode 1 to Mode 2
Maritime Studies Open Access 30 March 2016
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
from$1.95
to$39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Ziman, J. M. Basically, It's Purely Academic (in the press).
Merton, R. K. The Sociology of Science 267–268 (Chicago University Press, Chicago, 1973).
Ziman, J. M. Of One Mind: The Collectivization of Science 99–120; 265–310 (American Institute of Physics, New York, 1995).
Turner, S. P. in Theories of Science and Society (eds Cozzens, S. E. & Gieryn, T. F.) 185–211 (Indiana University Press, Bloomington, 1990).
Gibbons, M. et al. The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies (Sage, London, 1994).
Ziman, J. M. Prometheus Bound: Science in a Dynamic Steady State (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1994).
Ziman, J. M. Public Knowledge: The Social Dimension of Science (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1968).
Campbell, D. T. in The Philosophy of Karl Popper (ed. Schilpp, P. A.) 413–463 (Open Court, La Salle, IL, 1974).
Ziman, J. M. An Introduction to Science Studies (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1984).
Toulmin, S. Cosmopolis: The Hidden Agenda of Modernity (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1992).
Ezrahi, Y. The Descent of Icarus: Science and the Transformation of Contemporary Democracy (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1990).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ziman, J. Is science losing its objectivity?. Nature 382, 751–754 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1038/382751a0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/382751a0
This article is cited by
-
Objectivity for the research worker
European Journal for Philosophy of Science (2021)
-
Effective strategies for rebutting science denialism in public discussions
Nature Human Behaviour (2019)
-
Fake facts and alternative truths in medical research
BMC Medical Ethics (2018)
-
Scholarly motivations to conduct interdisciplinary climate change research
Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences (2017)
-
The role of science in fisheries management in Europe: from Mode 1 to Mode 2
Maritime Studies (2016)