The struggle between the Congress and the White House over environmental issues provides an opportunity for improving science at the US Environmental Protection Agency, a chance that may be lost in the fray of election-year politics.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Gingrich, N. To Renew America (HarperCollins, New York, 1995).
Setting Priorities, Getting Results: A New Direction for the Environmental Protection Agency (National Academy of Public Administration, Washington DC, 1995).
National Research Council Interim Report of the Committee on Research and Peer Review in EPA (National Academy Press, Washington DC, 1995).
National Performance Review Creating a US Environmental Protection Agency that Works Better and Costs Less: Phase I and II Reports. (EPA/210/R-93/004 and 005, 1993).
Stone, R. Science 262, 647 (1993).
United States of America Merit Systems Protection Board Allan R. Batterman v. Environmental Protection Agency (US Court of Appeals, Chicago Regional Office, 1993).
United States of America Merit Systems Protection Board Gilman Veith v. Environmental Protection Agency (US Court of Appeals, Washington DC, 1994).
United States of America Merit Systems Protection Board Judith L. Stagner v. Environmental Protection Agency (US Court of Appeals, Chicago Regional Office, 1994).
Research, Development, and Technical Services at EPA: A New Beginning (EPA/600/R-94/122, 1994).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lewis, D. EPA science: casualty of election politics. Nature 381, 731–732 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1038/381731a0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/381731a0
