Abstract
How long does it take for the human visual system to process a complex natural image? Subjectively, recognition of familiar objects and scenes appears to be virtually instantaneous, but measuring this processing time experimentally has proved difficult. Behavioural measures such as reaction times can be used1, but these include not only visual processing but also the time required for response execution. However, event-related potentials (ERPs) can sometimes reveal signs of neural processing well before the motor output2. Here we use a go/no-go categorization task in which subjects have to decide whether a previously unseen photograph, flashed on for just 20 ms, contains an animal. ERP analysis revealed a frontal negativity specific to no-go trials that develops roughly 150 ms after stimulus onset. We conclude that the visual processing needed to perform this highly demanding task can be achieved in under 150 ms.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Relevant articles
Open Access articles citing this article.
-
A novel videoscope and tool kit for percutaneous pericardial access under direct visualization
BioMedical Engineering OnLine Open Access 28 February 2023
-
Transcranial high-frequency random noise stimulation does not modulate Nogo N2 and Go/Nogo reaction times in somatosensory and auditory modalities
Scientific Reports Open Access 21 February 2023
-
Multiple expressions of “expert” abnormality gist in novices following perceptual learning
Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications Open Access 01 February 2023
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Get just this article for as long as you need it
$39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Thorpe, S., Fize, D. & Marlot, C. Speed of processing in the human visual system. Nature 381, 520–522 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1038/381520a0
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/381520a0
This article is cited by
-
Multiple expressions of “expert” abnormality gist in novices following perceptual learning
Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications (2023)
-
A novel videoscope and tool kit for percutaneous pericardial access under direct visualization
BioMedical Engineering OnLine (2023)
-
Transcranial high-frequency random noise stimulation does not modulate Nogo N2 and Go/Nogo reaction times in somatosensory and auditory modalities
Scientific Reports (2023)
-
Spatial attention in perceptual decision making as revealed by response-locked classification image analysis
Scientific Reports (2022)
-
Information-optimal local features automatically attract covert and overt attention
Scientific Reports (2022)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.