Main

Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM) has been defined as a neoplasm of B lymphocytes that involves the bone marrow (BM) and is associated with monoclonal immunoglobulin M (IgM) in serum.1 Most patients with the clinical and laboratory findings of WM have been classified as having lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma (LPL), and thus LPL and WM are linked in the World Health Organization classification.2

Lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma/Waldenström macroglobulinemia constitutes approximately 2% of all hematopoietic neoplasms.1, 3, 4, 5 Patients are usually older adults (median age, 63 years), and there is a slight male preponderance.5, 6 The serum concentration of IgM paraprotein varies widely in WM; thus presence of monoclonal IgM in serum, irrespective of level, and BM involvement are considered as two of the diagnostic requirements in the definition of WM as suggested by the Second International Workshop on Waldenström Macroglobulinemia (Table 1).1 The clinical features are highly variable, and many patients are asymptomatic.5 Clinically, a subset of patients has evidence of lymphadenopathy, hepatosplenomegaly, anemia, cytopenias,3, 7, 8, 9, 10 and hyperviscosity syndrome.5 The latter, however, is uncommon in patients with LPL/WM in our experience.11 Patients with LPL/WM usually have clinically indolent disease, with a median survival of 5 years, and up to 40% of patients survive more than 10 years or die from unrelated causes.6, 12 Some patients, however, can develop transformation to diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.13 LPL/WM is generally incurable with available therapy.

Table 1 Diagnostic criteria for Waldenström macroglobulinemia recommended by the Second International Workshop on Waldenström macroglobulinemia

BCL-10 is a proapoptic gene in vitro with a role in lymphocyte maturation, differentiation, and activation.14 BCL-10 cytoplasmic protein in humans is relatively restricted to lymphocytes, being expressed in B-cells with the strongest intensity in the germinal center, and less intensely in the marginal zone.14 Strong BCL-10 nuclear expression was first described in extranodal marginal zone B-cell lymphomas (MALT lymphoma) with the t(1;14)(p22;q32) and the BCL-10 gene was subsequently cloned and breakpoints identified.15, 16 Moderate nuclear expression of BCL-10 also has been reported in MALT lymphomas with the t(11;18) and strong cytoplasmic expression occurs in MALT lymphomas with the t(14;18) involving the MALT1 gene.17, 18, 19, 20

NF-κB is a transcription factor composed of five proteins (p50, p52, p65, c-Rel, and RelB) with a role in apoptosis regulation, cell proliferation, survival, and metastasis.21, 22 NF-κB, when inactive, is located in the cytoplasm and is bound to an inhibitory molecule, I kappa B (IκB). Upon phosphorylation, ubiquitination, and degradation of IκB, NF-κB is released into the cytosol, translocates into the nucleus, and transactivates several genes. Constitutive activation of NF-κB is implicated in oncogenesis of many neoplasms.23, 24, 25, 26 The presence of NF-κB proteins in the nucleus of the neoplastic cells is a harbinger of activation of the NF-κB complex.

In this study, we evaluated for nuclear expression of BCL-10 by immunohistochemistry in cases of LPL/WM. Furthermore, nuclear expression of p65 was used as a surrogate of NF-κB complex activation. Correlation between BCL-10, p65, available cytogenetic data, and various clinical and pathologic parameters was also performed.

Materials and methods

Tissue Specimens

From our archives, we retrieved BM specimens involved by LPL/WM. Approval for this study from the institutional review board was obtained. LPL/WM was defined on the basis of a combination of laboratory, clinical, morphologic, and immunophenotypic criteria as described by the World Health Organization2 and the International Workshop on WM guidelines (Table 1).1 The inclusion criteria for cases of LPL/WM in this study included IgM paraprotein in serum, presence of lymphoma in the BM composed of small lymphocytes of which a subset had plasmacytoid differentiation, and results of immunophenotypic studies (flow cytometry and/or immunohistochemistry) that demonstrated a monoclonal B-cell population positive for pan-B-cell antigens (CD19 or CD20) and negative for CD5 and CD10. We also excluded neoplasms that were associated with IgA or IgG serum paraprotein, as well as patients with IgM lymphoproliferative disorders associated with nodal or bulky splenic disease.

We also assessed a control group of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded BM specimens including 10 normal BM and 64 lymphomas of various types: 14 MALT lymphoma (four with t(11;18)), two nodal marginal zone B-cell lymphoma, one splenic marginal zone B-cell lymphoma, 11 follicular lymphoma, 20 chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma, 11 mantle cell lymphoma, and five diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

Immunohistochemistry

We performed immunostaining using 5-μm-thick, formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue sections, heat-induced epitope retrieval, and the Envision+ system (Dakocytomation, Carpinteria, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer's recommendations. The staining was carried out using Autostainer Plus (Dakocytomation). The washing buffer used was 0.05-M Tris-buffered saline supplemented with 0.05% Tween.

Single antibody staining

The following monoclonal antibodies were used: CD20 (Dako; 1:300), BCL-10 (Zymed, San Francisco, CA, USA; 1:40), NF-κB antibody p65, rabbit (polyclonal GTX27970, GeneTex Inc., San Antonio, TX, USA; 1:100), and PAX-5/BSAP (BD Transduction Laboratories, San Diego, CA, USA; 1:20).

Sections were first deparaffinized in xylene and rehydrated through graded concentrations of alcohol. Sections were heated in a steamer (Black & Decker HS2776 Type 1, Miami Lakes, FL, USA) for 20 min in target retrieval solution (Dakocytomation) for antigen retrieval. The activity of endogenous peroxidase was blocked with peroxidase-blocking reagent (Dakocytomation) for 5 min. After washing the sections with buffer, we incubated them with primary antibodies for 30 min at 23°C. Sections were then washed again with buffer.

The Envision+ HRP system (Dakocytomation) was used to visualize antigen expression. Diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride was used as the chromogen, and all sections were counterstained with hematoxylin. A sample of MALT lymphoma with the t(11;18) was used as a positive control for BCL-10 expression. A case of breast carcinoma was used as a positive control for p65 NF-κB staining.

Double staining

The first antibody, BCL-10, was applied as described above. After visualizing BCL-10 expression with diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride, we rewashed the section in buffer. Double-stain block (Dakocytomation) was applied for 3 min, the sections were incubated for 30 min at 23°C with the second antibody, CD20, and then rewashed. The expression of CD20 was visualized with Fast-Red substrate (Dakocytomation). All sections were then counterstained with hematoxylin.

Antibody Expression

Three observers (MM, LJM, and CBR) without knowledge of the clinical data evaluated the immunohistochemical results. Double staining was used only for the qualitative evaluation of the coexpression pattern. Cell counts were performed only in the single antibody-stained tissue sections. We used × 400 magnification to determine the percentage of tumor cells that exhibited positive immunoreactivity. At least 1000 neoplastic cells were counted in each case. The presence of membrane staining for CD20 and nuclear staining for PAX-5/BSAP, p65 NF-κB, and BCL-10 were scored as positive. For BCL-10 positive nuclear staining, we used a cutoff of ≥20% to classify tumors as having low and high expression.

For p65 NF-κB, the intensity of nuclear immunohistochemical staining was evaluated as follows: − negative, + focal expression in <5% of cells, and ++ diffuse expression in ≥5% of cells. Samples with ++ staining were classified as the ‘high-expression group’, and those with − or + were classified as the ‘low-expression group’. We used only two categories for statistical analysis: positive (≥5% nuclei positive) and negative (<5% nuclei positive).

PAX-5/BSAP expression was used in conjunction with hematoxylin and eosin-stained sections to evaluate the extent and pattern of BM involvement.

Clinical and Cytogenetic Data

Clinical follow-up was obtained by reviewing the medical records of the patients. Most patients had been followed-up with routine monitoring of serum IgM levels, BM aspiration and biopsy, or tissue biopsy when clinically indicated. The patients’ demographic data, time from original diagnosis, concentration of serum monoclonal IgM at time of biopsy (determined by nephelometry), and presence or absence of therapy were retrieved, statistically analyzed, and tabulated. Results of conventional G-band karyotype analysis were available for 29 of the 51 samples.

Statistical Analysis

Fisher's exact test and Wilcoxon rank-sum test were used to determine the association among BCL-10, p65 and various clinicopathologic parameters. P-values<0.05 were deemed as statistically significant. All analyses were carried out in S-plus software (Insightful Corp., Seattle, WA).

Results

We assessed 51 BM specimens involved by LPL/WM obtained from 47 patients. There were 28 men and 19 women with a mean age of 63 years (range, 39–80 years). The average percentage of BM involvement per biopsy specimen was 48% (range 5–90%). Monoclonal IgM was present in the serum of all patients (range 0.2–10 g/dl; mean 3.7 g/dl). In all, 36 of 47 (77%) patients had κ immunoglobulin light-chain restriction, and 10 (21%) patients had λ light-chain restriction. One patient had a biclonal phenotype, with both κ and λ light chains.

From the time of initial biopsy, the average duration of disease was 2.5 years (range, 1 month–10 years). In all, 24 patients had received some form of therapy, and 23 had not. We compared these two groups and found no significant difference between the clinical and pathologic variables. The only exception was an expected correlation between time with disease and therapy (P=0.0002, Table 2). As these groups had no important differences, we combined them for the data analysis (Table 2). The results of BCL-10 expression in B-cell lymphomas and normal bone marrow were summarized in Table 3.

Table 2 Differences between the treated and ‘not treated’ patient groups
Table 3 Summary of BCL-10 expression in B-cell lymphomas and normal bone marrow

BCL-10 cytoplasmic expression was present in virtually all cases of LPL/WM and therefore was not quantitatively analyzed in this study. It did parallel the expression of CD20 and PAX-5/BSAP, allowing the observer to evaluate the extent and pattern of BM involvement (Figure 1). Nuclear staining for BCL-10 was present in 28 of 51 (55%) samples. We used the double-staining technique for BCL-10 and CD20 to confirm the presence of BCL-10 expression in the neoplastic cells. Nuclear staining intensity in most cases was weak or moderate (Figures 1 and 2). No cases with strong nuclear BCL-10 expression were identified.

Figure 1
figure 1

Lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma/Waldenström macroglobulinemia (LPL/WM) diffusely involving BM. (a) Representative field of the neoplasm showing small lymphoma cells. Note the Dutcher bodies in the field (hematoxylin-eosin). (b) Double staining for BCL-10 and CD20 demonstrates nuclear and cytoplasmic BCL-10 expression restricted to the neoplastic cells that are highlighted by the CD20 membranous stain. (a, b. Original magnification for all images is × 200).

Figure 2
figure 2

(a) Normal BM biopsy specimen negative for BCL-10 in the hematopoietic elements; a few small mature lymphocytes show weak cytoplasmic staining. (b) In contrast, LPL/WM involving the BM shows extensive nuclear and cytoplasmic BCL-10 expression. (c) Mantle cell lymphoma involving BM with uniform cytoplasmic staining for BCL-10. (d) MALT lymphoma with t(11;18) involving lung shows moderate to strong nuclear staining for BCL-10 (original magnification for all images × 200, except the insets × 400).

Cytoplasmic p65 was expressed in most cases. p65 nuclear expression was identified in 17 of 50 (34%) specimens (Figure 3a); the double-staining technique for p65 and CD20 was used to confirm p65 expression in the neoplastic cells. Unlike BCL-10 nuclear expression that was accompanied by uniform cytoplasmic staining, p65 cytoplasmic staining was diminished, and in some neoplasms difficult to appreciate, in cases with strong nuclear p65 expression (Figure 3b).

Figure 3
figure 3

(a, b) Two cases of LPL/WM involving BM. (a) strong nuclear expression of p65 NF-κB, and (b) diminished cytoplasmic staining for p65 NF-κB, (original magnification for all images × 200).

There was no significant association between nuclear expression of BCL-10 and p65 (P=0.54, Fisher's exact test). Nuclear BCL-10 expression statistically correlated with extent of BM involvement. The median percentage of BM involvement for the BCL-10 negative and positive groups was 25 and 70, respectively (P=0.001, Wilcoxon rank-sum test). Nuclear BCL-10 expression did not correlate with sex, type of immunoglobulin light chain restriction, serum IgM level, and time with disease. Similarly, the associations between nuclear p65 expression and several clinicopathologic variables were assessed. There was a marginal association between nuclear p65 expression and extent of BM involvement. The median percentage of BM involvement for the p65 negative and p65 positive groups was 50 and 30, respectively (P=0.09, Wilcoxon rank-sum test). No correlation between nuclear p65 protein expression and the other variables was identified.

Four patients in this study had a follow-up BM biopsy specimen after a variable interval (9 months–10 years). In two patients, BCL-10 nuclear expression was found in the original biopsy specimen but was absent in the follow-up specimen. In one patient, BCL-10 was absent in both the initial and follow-up specimens. In the fourth patient, nuclear expression of BCL-10 was present only in the follow-up biopsy specimen. BCL-10 nuclear staining in these four patients showed some correlation with extent of tumor involvement and no correlation with therapy unless tumor volume decreased. In the two patients in whom the original biopsy specimen was positive for BCL10, in the follow-up biopsy specimen BCL-10 was negative and tumor burden was decreased. No correlation between BCL-10 nuclear staining and extent of BM involvement was observed in the other two patients. All biopsy specimens in this subgroup of patients were negative for nuclear p65 expression.

Conventional cytogenetic studies were performed on BM aspirate specimens of 29 LPL/WM patients. A total of 21 patients had a normal karyotype. Random clonal chromosomal abnormalities were identified in eight patients. None had the t(1;14), t(11;18), t(14;18), or t(9;14), and no other recurrent cytogenetic anomalies were identfied.

Discussion

The BCL-10 gene was first identified by its involvement in the t(1;14)(p22;q32) in two cases of MALT lymphoma.15, 16 Via the t(1;14), the BCL-10 gene located on 1p22 is juxtaposed with and comes under the influence of IgH enhancers on chromosome 14q32, resulting to BCL-10 overexpression.

In normal B- and T-cells, BCL-10 plays a role in antigen–receptor-mediated activation of the NF-κB complex,14 via its binding with MALT1 and other important molecules in this pathway. Physiologically, BCL-10 has an exclusively cytoplasmic localization.18 In MALT lymphomas, however, BCL-10 is aberrantly located in the nucleus of neoplastic cells that carry the t(1;14) and t(11;18), with strong or moderate expression, respectively. In fact, some investigators have used the pattern of BCL-10 immunostaining as a surrogate marker for the presence of these chromosomal translocations in MALT-lymphomas.19, 27 Currently, the mechanism underlying this aberrant expression pattern is not understood, but BCL-10 gene mutation seems an unlikely cause.27, 28, 29, 30 Moderate nuclear BCL-10 expression, however, has been observed in some cases of MALT lymphoma without the t(11;18).20, 31, 32 In addition, other B-cell lymphoproliferative disorders have been reported to express BCL-10 in a nuclear pattern although the staining is of moderate or weak intensity.17, 27 These findings are controversial, however, as other studies using immunohistochemistry or fluorescence in situ hybridization have failed to confirm BCL-10 nuclear expression in non-MALT lymphomas.27, 28, 29

In this study, we were interested in assessing BCL-10 expression in LPL/WM, a neoplasm that has been rarely studied for BCL-10 expression in the past, most likely because these neoplasms are rare and primarily involve the BM. We identified aberrant nuclear expression of BCL-10 in more than half of the specimens. Nuclear BCL-10 expression correlated with extent of BM involvement by LPL/WM, but did not correlate with other analyzed variables (age, sex, serum monoclonal IgM level, type of immunoglobulin light chain, and time with disease). As extent of involvement of the BM biopsy specimen is inversely associated with the survival rate of patients with LPL/WM,9 nuclear expression of BCL-10 in LPL/WM may have prognostic value although the explanation for this correlation is unknown.

As the biologic significance of nuclear BCL-10 in LPL/WM is unknown, we also assessed for expression of the p65 subunit of NF-κB to determine if the NF-κB pathway is activated. Others have shown that the NF-κB pathway is active in MALT lymphomas, and have suggested that NF-κB is a common downstream pathway for MALT lymphomas with the t(11;18), t(1;14), and t(14;18)/IgH-MALT1. NF-κB is a transcription factor that is composed of five proteins that form heterodimers. The p65 subunit is involved in most of these heterodimers. By detecting p65 expression and location, the results are a reasonable approximation of the activation status of NF-κB. We detected nuclear expression of p65 in approximately one third of cases of LPL/WM. These results indicate that NF-κB is activated in a subset of LPL/WM cases. Nuclear p65 expression did not statistically correlate with BCL-10 nuclear staining or other clinicopathologic parameters although there may be a trend suggesting that nuclear p65 expression inversely correlates with extent of BM involvement (P=0.09). As we were unable to find a statistically significant association between p65 and BCL-10, it is unlikely that BCL-10 has a major role in the downstream activation of p65 NF-κB in LPL/WM. Different molecular mechanisms of NF-κB activation have been proposed.33, 34 In the canonical or classical pathway, dimers contain either RelA or c-Rel, together with p50. Upon activation by pro-inflammatory cytokines, the IkB proteins are phosphorylated and undergo ubiquitin-dependent degradation by the proteasome, and NF-κB is translocated to the nucleus where it acts as transcription factor. Members of the tumor necrosis factor family activate the alternative pathway. The dimers contain RelB and p100 subunits. This pathway mainly activates IKKα, which phosphorylates p100 that is subsequently undergoes proteolyis to generate the p52 mature form.35, 36 It is possible that other NF-κB subunits such as c-Rel or RelB are involved in NF-κB activation in LPL/WM.

To our knowledge, this is the first report of the constitutional activation of NF-κB in LPL/WM. A previous study demonstrated cytoplasmic but no nuclear staining for p65 and p50 in 95% of the 40 cases of LPL/WM studied.37 The reason for the discrepancy between their results and our own is unclear. A different polyclonal antibody used and/or different antibody concentrations are possible explanations. On the assumption that unequivocal nuclear staining indicates NF-κB activation, we found positive immunostaining in only a small subset of the neoplastic cells in many neoplasms.

In summary, we identified nuclear expression of BCL-10 in over half of cases of LPL/WM. BCL-10 nuclear expression was not associated with specific chromosomal abnormalities, and in particular, was not associated with chromosomal translocations that correlate with nuclear BCL-10 expression in MALT lymphomas. BCL-10 appears to have a biological role in a subset of LPL/WM because NF-κB is activated in at least one third of cases. There was no correlation between BCL-10 and p65 NF-κB nuclear expression. However, the strong association of nuclear BCL-10 staining with extent of BM involvement, also possibly associated with nuclear p65 expression, may point toward a possible role of these two molecules in disease progression. It has recently been shown that MALT1 contains nuclear export signals and regulates the nucleocytoplasmic shuttling of the MALT1 and BCL-10 complex.38 Nagakawa et al38 suggested that these molecules are involved not only in the NF-κB pathway but in other biologic functions in lymphocytes. These results also raise the possibility that BCL-10 may be a potential therapeutic target in patients with LPL/WM.