Main

Breast cancer is a major cause of death among women, thus representing an important health problem. Adjuvant systemic therapy may considerably improve survival rates, but is on the other hand associated with toxic side effects. This conflict of interest is a problem particularly in patients with node-negative breast cancer, a group of patients with excellent prognosis and a 10-year recurrence rate of 30%. Routine adjuvant therapy for node-negative breast cancer is thus difficult to justify. Therefore, the identification of novel markers for node-negative high-risk patients, who would benefit from adjuvant therapy, is of major importance.

Signal transduction and modulation represent central mechanisms in cellular processes such as cell cycle regulation, oncogenesis and apoptosis. As tumor progression is based on a disturbed balance between proliferation and apoptosis, we investigated two kinases that are involved in these important cellular events: Akt and ERK1/2.

The Akt signaling pathway plays a central role in tumorigenesis.1 Akt is a serine/threonine kinase (also named protein kinase B [PKB]) and its activation is induced by phosphorylation mediated by PI3K in association with tyrosine kinase receptors. PI3K is localized upstream of the Akt kinase and is essential for the activation of Akt. The Akt kinase promotes cell survival by inhibition of apoptosis via phosphorylation of proapoptotic proteins such as Bad, forkhead transcription factor and caspase 9.2, 3 However, in addition to its antiapoptotic function, Akt is involved in cell proliferation by regulation of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors.4, 5

Among the tumor-cell survival pathways, those mediated by the Akt kinase are the most critical.6, 7 Moreover, Akt transfection results in a malignant phenotype as determined by growth in soft agar and tumor formation in nude mice.8 In human malignancies, Akt is activated in a variety of carcinomas including prostate, ovary and breast cancer.8, 9 In a recent study including both node-positive and -negative breast cancer patients, activation of Akt was seen in 54% of 93 cases after endocrine therapy. Survival analysis revealed that patients with pAkt-positive tumors were more prone to relapse with distant metastasis.10

The ERK signaling pathway represents a component of the mitogen activated protein kinases (MAPK) cascade and is activated by extracellular, frequently mitogenic ligands resulting in increased cellular proliferation in vivo.11, 12 In human breast cancer, activated ERK1/2 kinases were associated with lower survival rates, suggesting a prognostic value in primary breast cancer patients.13, 14

Poor prognosis and resistance to systemic therapy were found in breast cancer patients overexpressing the tyrosine kinase receptor encoded by the oncogene HER-2/neu. Studies on breast cancer cell lines have shown a crosstalk between HER-2/neu overexpression and activation of the Akt signaling pathway.15, 16 Akt activation was observed in HER-2/neu-positive breast cancer and may be responsible for higher tumor aggressiveness by increased resistance to stress-induced apoptosis.17

In this study, we examined the activation of Akt and ERK1/2 in node-negative breast cancer. We found Akt but not ERK1/2 phosphorylation to be an independent prognostic factor related to HER-2/neu overexpression. We provide evidence that Akt activation is associated with decreased tumor apoptosis, which may at least partly explain the poorer prognostic outcome.

Materials and methods

Patients

This study comprised 106 female breast cancer patients (mean age 55 years) from the Department of Gynecology (University of Essen, Germany), who underwent surgery between 1989 and 1993. Complete clinical records and follow-up information were available in all cases. The negative lymph node status was confirmed by axillary dissection. All surgical material was fixed in 4% formalin and routinely processed. The tumors were classified according to the pTNM System (5th edition) and graded according to Elston and Ellis.18 Out of 106 patients, 27 died during follow-up, and in one case the cause of death was unknown. In all, 19 patients died of breast cancer, and seven were excluded from this study, having died from either benign or other cancer diseases. Statistical analysis of the remaining 99 cases was based on a mean follow-up period of 10 (mean 9.9) years. In 51 cases, mastectomy had been performed (51.5%), and 48 patients were treated with local excisions (48.5%). In total, 74 patients were treated by surgery alone, whereas 21 patients received adjuvant radiation and four underwent adjuvant endocrine therapy. Table 1 summarizes the clinicopathological parameters of this study.

Table 1 Clinicopathological data (99 node-negative breast cancer)

Phospho-Akt and ERK1/2 Immunostaining

Human Akt exists as three isoforms: Akt1/PKBα, Akt2/PKBβ and Akt3/PKBχ. In the present study, we used a nonisoform specific antibody reacting with Akt1 when phosphorylated at serine 473 and Akt2/3 when phosphorylated at sites equivalent to the serine 473 site of Akt1.19 Rabbit polyclonal phospho-Akt antibody (Ser473; Cell Signaling Technology, Beverly, MA, USA) was used at 1 : 200 dilution, and monoclonal phospho-p44/42 MAP kinase antibody (Thr 202/Tyr 204; Cell Signaling Technology) at 1 : 100 dilution. Immunocytochemistry was performed on 5 μm thick paraffin sections. Antigen retrieval was carried out with 0.01 M citrate buffer at pH 6.1 for 20 min (phospho-Ser 473 PKB/Akt), respectively, 40 min (phospho ERK1/2) in a hot water bath (95°C). Both antibodies were incubated overnight in a humidified chamber at 4°C. The APAAP method was used for antibody demonstration. Paraffin slides of a human prostate cancer cell line (LNCaP), treated and untreated with an inhibitor of PI3Kinase (LY294002), served as Akt-positive and -negative control. Untreated LNCap cells revealed a strong membranous immunoreactivity with the pAkt antibody whereas treated LNCap cells failed to show an immunoreaction.

Semiquantification of Akt and ERK1/2 Staining

Tumor cells with easily detectable specific immunostaining, independent of the amount of stained cells, were scored as strongly positive (2+). Tumors exhibiting a detectable but faint immunostaining were scored as weak (1+), whereas tumors with a minimal, hardly detectable or missing staining pattern were classified as negative (0).

Receptor Status and HER2 Protein Expression

The estrogen (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) status of the tumors was determined using monoclonal anti-human antibodies (ER: clone 1D5, Code No. M 7047; PR: clone PgR 636, Code No. M 3569; DAKO). After antigen retrieval the primary antibodies were incubated for 30 min (PR; dilution: 1 : 50), respectively, 2 h (ER; dilution 1 : 25). The monoclonal PowerVision (No. DPVM-110AP, ImmunoVision Tech. Co) served as a detection system. Semiquantitative evaluation followed. A tumor was regarded as receptor negative if none or less than 10% of the tumor cells showed weak or missing nuclear immunostaining. For statistical analysis, cases were subdivided into a negative and a positive group. The DAKO HercepTest™ was used to detect the HER2/neu protein expression (DAKO, No. K 5204). Staining procedures were performed following the manufacturer's protocols. For statistical analysis, negative (DAKO score 0 and 1+) and positive (DAKO score 2+ and 3+) groups were created.

Ki67 Immunostaining, TUNEL

The Ki67 antigen was detected using a standard APAAP method. After antigen retrieval, the prediluted monoclonal anti-Ki67 antibody (Biogenex, San Ramon, USA) was incubated for 2 h in a humidified chamber. The growth fraction (GF) was defined as the percentage of Ki67-positive nuclei per 500 tumor cells. In situ DNA fragmentation was established using the terminal desoxyribonucleotide transferase (TdT)-mediated dUTP nick end labeling technique (TUNEL) in paraffin-embedded sections. We used the ApoTag™ Plus Peroxidase in Situ Apoptosis Detection Kit (Intergen Company). Staining procedures were again performed following the manufacturer's recommendations. Incubation with 20 μg/ml proteinase K solution was modified to 10 min in order to achieve maximum staining results. Apoptotic count was performed using a light microscope, counting stained apoptotic tumor cells per 10 high-power fields (HPF) (× 400 magnification). Corresponding H&E sections were analyzed to avoid miscounting necrotic cells. In 10 cases, the amount of tumor tissue available was not sufficient for adequate counting.

Mitotic Count (MC)

MC was carried out taking into consideration the actual area of 10 HPF of the Leica DMLB microscope. MC results were grouped as 0–10, 11–21, and more than 21 per HPF.

Statistical Analysis

Immunostainings were assessed independently by two of the authors (KJS and FO) in a blind-trial fashion without a knowledge of the clinical outcome. In case of disagreement, slides were re-evaluated by both and a final decision was made. There was a very high interobserver concordance of pAkt staining scores (Spearman rank-correlation coefficient: r=0.904; P<0.001) and the staining results were highly reproducible (r=0.710; P<0.001). All data were converted to a PC and statistically analyzed using SPSS Version 10 for Windows. Relationships between ordinal parameters were investigated using two-tailed χ2 analysis (or Fisher's exact test where patient numbers were small). The relationship between apoptotic count and pAkt was determined using the Mann–Whitney's U test. Overall survival (OS) curves were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method, and any differences in the survival curves were compared by the log-rank test. For multivariate analysis, the Cox regression was used. For both tests, a P-value of 0.05 or less was considered to be of statistical significance. Overall, 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were used throughout.

Results

Phospho-Akt Immunostaining

Prominent cytoplasmic and partly nuclear pAkt immunoreactivity was limited to tumor cells, whereas non-neoplastic breast tissue revealed minimal or no staining. Occasionally, staining heterogeneity was apparent at the invasive tumor front. Of all the patients examined, 35 cases (35.4%) were classified as negative for phospho-Akt, 57 (57.6%) breast cancers showed a weak mainly cytoplasmatic immunostaining and seven (7.1%) cases exhibited a strong cytoplasmatic as well as nuclear immunostaining. Five out of these seven tumors in this group were moderately differentiated (71.4%), while two of the seven tumors were poorly differentiated. Among the pAkt-overexpressing subgroup, three patients underwent mastectomy and four were treated by local excision; two received adjuvant therapy. No correlation was found between pAkt and tumor size, GF, MC, grading or receptor status.

Phospho-ERK1/2 Immunostaining

Tumor cells exhibited strongest nuclear and cytoplasmatic immunostaining while non-neoplastic breast tissue only occasionally revealed a weak staining. Similar to pAkt, heterogenous immunostaining for pERK1/2 was detected at the invasive tumor front. In all, 66 (66.7%) tumors were classified as negative, 25 tumors (25.3%) exhibited a weak staining, eight (8.1%) tumors showed a strong cytoplasmatic and nuclear staining. Statistical analysis failed to show any relationship between pERK1/2 and pAkt, histological grading, GF, MC, tumor size, TUNEL, HER-2/neu overexpression, receptor status or OS (data not shown).

HER-2/neu Status

A total of 97 tumors were analyzed for HER-2/neu protein expression: 26 (26.9%). were classified as negative (0), 42 (43.3%) as negative (1+), 15 (15.5%) as weakly positive (2+) and 14 (14.4%) as strongly positive (3+). Tumors with a score 2+ and 3+ were defined as HER-2/neu positive. Five of the seven (71.4%) tumors classified as strongly pAkt positive showed HER-2/neu protein overexpression, while pAkt-negative or -weakly positive tumors exhibited in less than 30% a HER-2/neu overexpression. Statistical analysis revealed a significant relationship of HER-2/neu overexpression (2+ and 3+) with pAkt-immunostaining intensity (P=0.045, Figure 1).

Figure 1
figure 1

Number of HER-2/neu-overexpressing tumors (2+ and 3+) corresponding to pAkt immunoexpression. Tumors with strong Akt activation show significant HER-2/neu overexpression (P=0.045; χ2 analysis).

Lower Apoptotic Rate in pAkt-immunopositive Tumors

The number of apoptotic cells correlated directly with the GF determined by Ki67 immunostaining (Pearson's r=0.427, P<0.01) and MC (r=0.342, P<0.01). There was a significantly lower number of apoptotic cells per 10 HPF in pAkt weak/strong cases compared to pAkt-negative cases (P<0.05; Figure 2). All tumors, stratified according to their pAkt immunostaining intensity, revealed similar GFs and MC (data not shown). The number of apoptotic cells correlated with the histological grading. Poorly differentiated tumors exhibited significantly higher apoptotic cell counts per 10 HPF than moderate or well-differentiated tumors (data not shown). No relationship was seen between apoptosis and receptor status, respectively, HER-2/neu status Representative immuno-histochemical stainings are shown in Figure 3.

Figure 2
figure 2

Boxplots showing the relation of pAkt immunostaining intensity and apoptosis detected by TUNEL staining. Tumors with weak/strong Akt phosphorylation are significantly associated with a reduced amount of TUNEL-positive cells (P=0.045; Mann–Whitney U test). Open circles indicate outliers. Data were available for 89 cases.

Figure 3
figure 3

Representative immunohistochemical stainings of serial sections of three tumors for pAkt, HercepTest™ and TUNEL. A1A3: pAkt: The staining intensity of invasive carcinomas ranged from strong (A1) to weak (A2) and negative (A3). B1B3: HercepTest™: Tumors showing a strong pAkt immunostaining (A1) exhibited more frequently HER-2/neu protein overexpression (DAKO-Score 3+) (B1) whereas tumors expressing a weak or none pAkt immunostaining were more often classified as DAKO-Score 1+ or 0 (B2; B3). C1C3: TUNEL staining: Tumors with a strong pAkt immunostaining feature a decreased amount of TUNEL-positive cells (C1), weak or negative pAkt immunostaining is correlated with higher numbers of TUNEL-positive cells (C2–C3).

Prognosis

Only two out of 35 (5.7%) patients classified as pAkt negative in our study died of breast cancer. In contrast three out of seven (42.8%) patients classified as strongly pAkt positive died from the same cause. In all, 14 of 57 (24.6%) patients classified as weakly pAkt positive died of breast cancer; in one case, cause of death was unknown.

No significant difference in survival was detected between patients with diverse adjuvant or surgical treatment (data not shown). OS was inversely associated with different pAkt staining intensity (Figure 4; P=0.0099). Parallel analysis revealed that histological grading, ER status, HER-2/neu status and MC (P<0.05) were significantly related to shorter OS (Table 2). The parameters tumor size (P=0.08; cutoff 1.5 cm) and progesterone receptor status (P=0.0612) tended to be associated with decreased OS but failed to reach statistical significance. No significant relationship was observed between pERK1/2, Ki-67, apoptotic count and OS. OS and the relevant clinicopathological parameters (pAkt, histological grading, ER, MC and HER-2/neu) were subject to multivariate analyses. As a result, only pAkt was statistically associated with OS (log-rank test, P=0.015) in the group of node-negative breast cancer patients (Table 3).

Figure 4
figure 4

Kaplan–Meier survival plot of 99 node-negative breast cancers in relation to pAkt immunostaining intensity. Log-rank test: P=0.0099.

Table 2 Univariate analysis (Kaplan–Meier, log-rank test) for prognostic significance of pAkt, histological grading, receptor status, HER-2/neu, MC, Ki-67 and tumor size
Table 3 Results of multivariate analysis (Cox regression) to determine the independent prognostic value of different variables in relation to OS

Discussion

This study examined the activation of Akt and ERK1/2 in node-negative breast cancer by immunohistochemistry. We demonstrated that active Akt (pAkt) but not active ERK1/2 (pERK1/2) was significantly associated with a decreased OS in this collective of node-negative breast cancer patients and provide evidence that pAkt is related to decreased tumor apoptosis and HER-2/neu overexpression.

Activation of Akt results in pleiotrophic effects contributing to tumor aggressiveness. At least 13 Akt substrates have been identified so far in mammalian cells. They can be categorized into two main classes: regulators of apoptosis on the one hand, and of cell growth (including protein synthesis and glycogen metabolism)20 and cell cycle regulation4, 5 on the other.

To determine which function of Akt may be associated with the shortened OS of patients with Akt-positive tumors, we focused on apoptosis (TUNEL) and cell proliferation (Ki67, Mc). Our data indicate that tumors with activated Akt exhibit a lower amount of TUNEL-positive cells compared to pAkt-negative tumors, implying a lower apoptotic rate. Although proliferation and apoptosis are assumed to play a key role in tumor progression, the clinical relevance of apoptotic frequency in breast cancer remains unclear.21 Several studies conducted on the possible prognostic value of apoptotic markers revealed varying results. While some studies report high levels of apoptosis to be associated with worse survival,22, 23, 24 the majority fail to demonstrate an independent prognostic value.25, 26, 27, 28 In contrast, Tanaka et al29 demonstrated that loss of apoptosis due to the expression of an apoptosis inhibitor (survivin) was an independent prognostic parameter in breast cancer. Tumor growth is not only determined by tumor cell proliferation, but rather by the net result of proliferation and cell death. We did not find an increase in proliferative activity measured by Ki-67 immunoreactivity and MCs in cases of breast cancer with Akt activation; this suggests an impaired balance between cell loss and cell gain, resulting in a shift toward tumor net growth due to decreased apoptosis.

Contrary to a previous report13 describing a potential prognostic value of ERK1/2 MAP kinase activity in breast cancer independently of nodal status, we could not confirm this observation. This discrepancy may be explained by the patient selection in our cohort, which was focused on node-negative patients. Recent investigations revealed Akt as a downstream target of HER-2/neu signaling.17, 30, 31 The biological effects of HER-2/neu overexpression are mediated via several intracellular pathways regulating important downstream substrates including MAP kinase, phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) and Akt.32 Dimerization of HER-2/HER-3 has been shown to be connected to PI3K with subsequent phosphorylation of Akt.33 We report a significant relationship between pAkt and HER-2/neu in our study, which may result from activation of Akt via HER-2/overexpression.

In a recent study, Perez-Tenorio and Stal10 advocated a prognostic relevance for Akt activation in human breast cancer but did not separate node-positive and -negative patients. The findings presented here extend these observations by showing that Akt activation is an independent prognostic parameter in node-negative breast cancer. Since we have shown that activation of Akt coincides with reduced OS, treatment of certain patients with PI3K inhibitors may disclose new therapeutic options. In vitro, inhibitors of the PI3K signaling pathway such as Wortmannin and LY294002 have a proapoptotic effect.34, 35

In conclusion, our results suggest that activation of Akt in node-negative breast cancer indicates a more aggressive tumor behavior. The detection of Akt phosphorylation may be considered as a useful marker to identify high-risk patients, who would benefit from adjuvant therapy. However, due to the relatively small number of patients who died from breast cancer (n=19) in this cohort (n=99), these promising results need to be confirmed in larger cohorts.

The understanding of the Akt signaling pathway and connections to other signal transduction cascades may lead to new concepts for therapeutic strategies in human breast cancer.36