Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Time and size of a giant earthquake in Cascadia inferred from Japanese tsunami records of January 1700

Abstract

GEOLOGICAL evidence shows that great earthquakes have occurred in the recent prehistoric past in the Cascadia subduction zone, off the Pacific coast of North America. The most recent event (or series of events) is dated at about 300 years ago1–4, but the precise date and magnitude have not been determined. Geological investigations have not been able to distinguish a single giant earthquake from a series of great earthquakes occurring over a timespan of a decade or two4, although this information is important for the assessment of future hazard5. We have found several tsunami records in Japan from AD 1700 with no indication of a local cause. Historical earthquake records and palaeoseismic evidence indicate the absence of a large earthquake in 1700 in South America, Alaska or Kamchatka, leaving Cascadia as the most likely source of this tsunami. The estimated time of the earthquake is the evening (about 21:00 local time) of 26 January 1700. The magnitude is estimated as 9 from the tsunami heights, in which case the earthquake ruptured the entire length of the Cascadia subduction zone2. These estimates are consistent with Native American legends that an earthquake occurred on a winter night6.

Your institute does not have access to this article

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

$32.00

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. Atwater, B. F. Science 236, 942–944 (1987).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Atwater, B. F. et al. Earthquake Spectra 11, 1–18 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Atwater, B. F., Stuiver, M. & Yamaguchi, D. K. Nature 353, 156–158 (1991).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Nelson, A. R. et al. Nature 378, 371–374 (1995).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Heaton, T. H. & Hartzell, S. H. Science 236, 162–168 (1987).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Clague, J. J. Current Research, Geological Survey of Canada 1995-A 47–50 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Heaton, T. H. & Kanamori, H. Bull. seism. Soc. Am. 74, 933–941 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ando, M. Tectonophysics 27, 119–140 (1975).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sangawa, A. Jishin-koukogaku (Seismoarchaeology) (Chuou-kouron, Tokyo, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kreober, A. L. Yurok Myths (Univ. California Press, Berkeley 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Heaton, T. H. & Snavely, P. D. Bull. seism. Soc. Am. 75, 1455–1460 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  12. DeBois, C. A. Am. Anthrop. 34, 248–262 (1932).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Maud, R. (ed.) The Sechelt and the South-eastern Tribes of Vancouver Island (Talonbooks, Vancouver, 1978).

  14. MaCaffrey, R. & Goldfinger, C. Science 267, 856–859 (1995).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Cohee, B. P., Somerville, P. G. & Abrahamson, N. A. Bull. seism. Soc. Am. 81, 28–56 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Whitmore, P. M. Natural Hazards 8, 59–73 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Tsuji, Y. Rekishi Jishin (Historical Earthquakes) 3, 220–238 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Watanabe, H. Nihon Higai Tsunami Souran (Catalogue of Damaging Tsunamis in Japan) (Univ. Tokyo Press, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ben-Menahem, A. & Rosenman, M. J. geophys. Res. 77, 3097–3128 (1972).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Abe, K. J. geophys. Res. 84, 1561–1568 (1979).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Abe, K. Bull. Earthquake Res. Inst. Univ. Tokyo 64, 51–69 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lockridge, P. A. Tsunamis in Peru-Chile (National Geophys. Data Center, Boulder. 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lomnitz, C. Geol. Rdsch. 59, 938–960 (1970).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Soloviev, S. L. Basic Data on Tsunamis on the Pacific Coast of the USSR, 1737–1796, Study of Tsunami in an Open Ocean (Nauka, Moscow, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Combellick, R. A. Professional Rep. 112, (Alaska Div. geol. geophys. Surveys, Fairbanks, 1991).

  26. Plafker, G., LaJoie, K. R. & Rubin, M. in Radiocarbon After Four Decades (eds. Taylor, R. E., Long, A. & Kra, R. S.) 436–453 (Springer, New York, 1992).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  27. Satake, K. Pure appl. Geophys. 144, 455–470 (1995).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Tanioka, Y., Ruff, L. & Satake, K. Geophys. Res. Lett. 22, 1661–1664 (1995).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Kajiura, K. in Tsunamis—Their Science and Engineering (eds. Iida, K. & Iwasaki, T.) 131–145 (Terra Sci. Pub., Tokyo, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Satake, K., Shimazaki, K., Tsuji, Y. et al. Time and size of a giant earthquake in Cascadia inferred from Japanese tsunami records of January 1700. Nature 379, 246–249 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1038/379246a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/379246a0

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing