Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Economic and environmental choices in the stabilization of atmospheric CO2 concentrations

Abstract

THE ultimate goal of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change is to achieve "stabilization of greenhouse-gas concentrations at a level that would prevent dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system". With the concentration targets yet to be determined, Working Group I of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change developed a set of illustrative pathways for stabilizing the atmospheric CO2 concentration at 350, 450, 550, 650 and 750 p.p.m.v. over the next few hundred years1,2. But no attempt was made to determine whether the implied emissions might constitute a realistic transition away from the current heavy dependence on fossil fuels. Here we devise new stabilization profiles that explicitly (albeit qualitatively) incorporate considerations of the global economic system, estimate the corresponding anthropogenic emissions requirements, and assess the significance of the profiles in terms of global-mean temperature and sea level changes. Our findings raise a number of important issues for those engaged in climate-change policy making, particularly with regard to the optimal timing of mitigation measures.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Enting, I. G., Wigley, T. M. L. & Heimann, M. Future Emissions and Concentrations of Carbon Dioxide: Key Ocean/Atmosphere/Land Analyses (Division of Atmospheric Res., CSIRO, Australia, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Schimel, D. S. et al. in Climate Change 1994: Radiative Forcing of Climate Change and an Evaluation of the IPCC IS92 Emissions Scenarios (eds Houghton, J. T. et al.) 35–71 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Leggett, J. A., Pepper, W. J. & Swart, R. J. in Climate Change, 1992. The Supplementary Report to the IPCC Scientific Assessment (eds Houghton, J. T., Callander, B. A. & Varney, S. K.) 69–95 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wigley, T. M. L. in The Global Carbon Cycle (eds Wigley, T. M. L. & Schimel, D. S.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, in the press).

  5. Wigley, T. M. L. Tellus 45B, 409–425 (1993).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. IPCC Working Group III in Climate Change 1994: Radiative Forcing of Climate Change and an Evaluation of the IPCC IS92 Emissions Scenarios (eds Houghton, J. T. et al.) 233–304 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1995).

  7. Dean, A. & Hoeller, P. Costs of Reducing CO2 Emissions (OECD Economic Studies No. 19, OECD, Paris, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Energy Modeling Forum Reducing Giobal Carbon Emissions-Costs and Policy Options (EMF 12, Stanford Univ., Stanford, CA, 1993).

  9. Goldemberg, J., Johansson, T. B., Reddy, A. & Williams, R. Energy for a Sustainable World (Wiley-Eastern Report, New Delhi, India & World Resources Institute, Washington, DC. 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Nordhaus, W. D. The Efficient Use of Energy Resources (Yale Univ. Press, New Haven, CT, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Manne, A. & Richels, R. The Greenhouse Debate—Economic Efficiency. Burden Sharing and Hedging Strategies (Working Paper, Stanford Univ., Stanford, CA, 1995); Energy J. (in the press).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Richels, R. & Edmonds, J. A. in Integrative Assessment of Mitigation. Impacts, and Adaptation to Climate Change (eds Nakicenovic, N., Nordhaus, W. D., Richels, R. & Toth, F. L.) 341–352 (International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria, 1994); Energy Policy (In the press).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kosobud, R., Daly, T., South, D. & Quinn, K. Energy J. 15, 213–232 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Nordhaus, W. D. Managing the Global Commons: The Economics of Climate Change (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Fankhauser, S. Valuing Climate Change (Earthscan, London, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wigley, T. M. L. & Raper, S. C. B. Nature 357, 293–300 (1992).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Raper, S. C. B., Wigley, T. M. L. & Warrick, R. A. in Rising Sea Level and Subsiding Coastal Areas (ed. Milliman, J. D.) (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, in the press).

  18. Mitchell, J. F. B., Manabe, S., Tokioka, T. & Meleshko, V. in Climate Change. The IPCC Scientific Assessment (eds Houghton, J. T., Jenkins; G. J. & Ephraums, J. J.) 131–172 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wigley, T. M. L. Nature 349, 503–506 (1991).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Edmonds, J. A., Wise, M. & MacCracken, C. Advanced Energy Technologies and Climate Change: An Analysis Using the Global Change Assessment Model (GCAM) (PNL-9798. UC-402, Pacific Northwest Lab., Richland, WA, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wigley, T. M. L. Geophys. Res. Lett. 22, 45–48 (1995).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wigley, T., Richels, R. & Edmonds, J. Economic and environmental choices in the stabilization of atmospheric CO2 concentrations. Nature 379, 240–243 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1038/379240a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/379240a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing