Letter | Published:

Constraints on the origins of hydrocarbon gas from compositions of gases at their site of origin

Nature volume 378, pages 368371 (23 November 1995) | Download Citation

Subjects

Abstract

IT is widely accepted that natural gas is formed from thermal decomposition of both oil in reservoirs and, to a lesser extent, the organic matter in shales from which the oil was derived1–6. But laboratory pyrolysis experiments on shales do not reproduce the methane-rich composition typical of most gas reservoirs7, leading to suggestions7 that other mechanisms, such as transition-metal catalysis, may be important. The discrepancy might, however, instead arise because gas (and oil) deposits have migrated from their source rocks, so that the reservoir composition might not be representative of the composition in the source rocks where the hydrocarbons were generated. To address this question, we have analysed gas samples coproduced with oils directly from a source rock (the Bakken shales, North Dakota, USA) where the local geology has prevented significant hydrocarbon migration. The methane contents of these Bakken-shale gases are much lower than that of conventional gas reservoirs, but are consistent with that from pyrolysis experiments8,9 on these shales. Thus, because these Bakken gases form with (rather than from) oils, we argue that compositional differences between gases from source rocks and conventional gas deposits result from fractionation processes occurring after hydrocarbon expulsion from the source rock.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    Bull. Am. Ass. Petrol. Geol. 67, 2225–2238 (1983).

  2. 2.

    Bull. Am. Ass. Petrol. Geol. 67, 1176–1191 (1983).

  3. 3.

    Chem. Geol. 71, 1–10 (1988).

  4. 4.

    Chem. Geol. 71, 77–96 (1988).

  5. 5.

    , & Chem. Geol. 71, 97–104 (1988).

  6. 6.

    Mar. Petrol. Geol. 8, 232–240 (1991).

  7. 7.

    , & Nature 368, 536–538 (1994).

  8. 8.

    & in Organic Geochemistry—Advances and Applications in Energy and the Natural Environment (ed. Manning, D. A. C.) 335–339 (European Association Organic Geochemists, Manchester, UK, 1991).

  9. 9.

    in Sources of Natural Gas (eds Rice, D. & Schoell, M.) Chem. Geol. (in the press).

  10. 10.

    & Petroleum Formation and Occurrence (Springer, New York, 1984).

  11. 11.

    & Bull. Can. Petrol. Geol. 42, 187–218 (1994).

  12. 12.

    & in Geological Studies Relevant to Horizontal Drilling: Examples from Western North America (eds Schmocker, J. W., Coalson, E. B. & Brown, C. A.) 199–214 (Rocky Mountain Association Geologists, Denver, 1992).

  13. 13.

    , & Open-File Rep. 88–391 (US Geol. Surv., 1988).

  14. 14.

    Mem. Am. Ass. Petrol. Geol. Mem. 9, V. 2 1433–1445 (1968).

  15. 15.

    Bull. Am. Ass. Petrol. Geol. 38, 816–853 (1954).

  16. 16.

    , , & Chem. Geol. 71, 117–147 (1988).

  17. 17.

    J. Geochem. Explor. 7, 155–188 (1977).

  18. 18.

    & Information Circ. No. 9301 (Bureau of Mines, US Dept of Interior, Pittsburgh, 1991).

  19. 19.

    & Energy and Fuels (in the press).

  20. 20.

    & J. Petrol. Geol. 8, 59–84 (1985).

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. US Geological Survey, MS-940, Denver Federal Center, Denver, Colorado 80225, USA

    • Leigh C. Price
  2. Chevron Petroleum Technology Co., PO Box 446, La Habra, California 90633-0446, USA

    • Martin Schoell

Authors

  1. Search for Leigh C. Price in:

  2. Search for Martin Schoell in:

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/378368a0

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.