Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Locomotor performance of insects with rudimentary wings

Abstract

THE evolution of flight in insects triggered an unparalleled radiation and diversification such that flying insects comprise approximately two-thirds of all species1, yet a gap in the fossil record obscures the origins of wings and flight2. Among modern insects, stoneflies are morphologically primitive for several flight-related traits, which makes their locomotor behaviour and physiology of particular interest3. Here we show that Allocapnia vivipara stoneflies use a non-flying form of aerodynamic locomotion which may exemplify a precursor to flight. They raise their wings in response to wind, thereby sailing across water surfaces, but they are incapable of flapping. Sailing performance improves steadily with increasing wing size, and even the smallest wings significantly increase sailing velocity compared to wingless individuals. Performance during aerial gliding is less affected by wing size, which suggests that sailing is a more plausible setting for wing evolution. These results support the hypothesis that insect wings evolved from articulated gill plates of aquatic ancestors through an intermediate semi-aquatic stage4.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hammond, P. M. in Global Biodiversity (ed. Groombridge, B.) 17–39 (Chapman & Hall, London, 1992).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Kingsolver, J. G. & Koehl, M. A. R. Rev. Entomol. 39, 425–451 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Brodsky, A. K. The Evolution of Insect Flight (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Marden, J. H. & Kramer, M. G. Science 266, 427–430 (1994).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kinsolver, J. G. & Koehl, M. A. R. Evolution 39, 488–504 (1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wootton, R. J. & Ellington, C. P. in Biomechanics in Evolution (ed. Rayner, J. M. V. & Wootton, R. J.) 99–112 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kukalova-Peck, J. J. Morphol. 156, 53–126 (1978).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kukalova-Peck, J. in The Insects of Australia 2nd edn (ed. Naumann, I. D.) 141–179 (Melbourne University Press, Melbourne, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Joosse, E. N. G. in Marine Insects (ed. Cheng, L.) 151–186 (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Douglas, M. M. Science 211, 84–86 (1981).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Wigglesworth, V. B. Proc. R. Entomol. Soc., Lond. 28, 23–32 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wootton, R. J. Antenna 10, 82–86 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Marden, J., Kramer, M. Locomotor performance of insects with rudimentary wings. Nature 377, 332–334 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1038/377332a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/377332a0

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing