Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Size and structure of the Chicxulub crater revealed by horizontal gravity gradients and cenotes

Abstract

IT is now widely believed that a large impact occurred on the Earth at the end of the Cretaceous period, and that the buried Chicxulub structure in Yucatán, Mexico, is the resulting crater24. Knowledge of the size and internal structure of the Chicxulub crater is necessary for quantifying the effects of the impact on the Cretaceous environment. Although much information bearing on the crater's structure is available, diameter estimates range from 170 to 300 km (refs 1á¤-7), corresponding to an order of magnitude variation in impact energy. Here we show the diameter of the crater to be ˜180 km by examining the horizontal gradient of the Bouguer gravity anomaly over the structure. This size is confirmed by the distribution of karst features in the Yucatan region (mainly water-filled sinkholes, known as cenotes). The coincidence of cenotes and peripheral gravity-gradient maxima suggests that cenote formation is closely related to the presence of slump faults near the crater rim.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

$32.00

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. Hildebrand, A. R. et al. Geology 19, 867–871 (1991).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Pilkington, M., Hildebrand, A. R. & Ortiz-Aleman, C. J. geophys. Res. 99, 13147–13162 (1994).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hildebrand, A. R., Connors, M., Pilkington, M., Ortiz-Aleman, C. & Chavez, R. E. Rev. Soc. Mex. Paleo. 7, 59–68 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Espindola, J. M., Mena, M., de La Fuente, M. & Campos-Enriquez, J. O. Phys. Earth planet. Inter. (in the press).

  5. Pope, K. O., Ocampo, A. C. & Duller, C. E. Earth Moon Planets 63, 93–104 (1993).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Sharpton, V. L. et al. Science 261, 1564–1567 (1993).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Camargo-Zanoguera, A. & Suárez-Reynoso, G. Bol. Asoc. Mex. Géof. Expl. 34, 1–28 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sharpton, V. L., Grieve, R. A. F., Thomas, M. D. & Halpenny, J. F. Geophys. Res. Lett. 14, 808–811 (1987).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bunting, J. A., de Laeter, J. R. & Libby, W. G. Annual Report 1979 81–85 (Geol. Surv. of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, 1980).

  10. Ness, G. E., Dauphin, J. P., Garcia-Abdeslem, J. & Alvarado-Omana, M. E. Map and Chart Series MCH073 (Geol. Soc. Am., Boulder, CO, 1991).

  11. Pilkington, M., Grieve, R. A. F., Rupert, J. D. & Halpenny, J. Map 1807A (Geol. Surv. Can, Ottawa, 1992).

  12. Melosh, H. J. Impact Cratering: A Geologic Process 245 (Oxford Univ. Press, New York, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Cué, A. V. Bol. Asoc. Mex. Geol. Petrol. 5, 285–290 (1953).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Pearce, S. J. & Melosh, H. J. Geophys. Res. Lett. 13, 1419–1422 (1986).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Marin, L. E. thesis, Northern Illinois Univ. (1990).

  16. De Landa, D. Yacután Before and after The Conquest 184 (trans. by Gates, W., San Fernando, Mérida, México, 1556).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lopez-Ramos, E. The Gulf of Mexico and the Caribbean (eds Nairn, A. E. M. & Stehli, F. G.) 257–282 (Plenum, New York, 1975).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  18. Cartas Geologica, Calkini F15-9-12, Tizimin, F16-7, Merida, F16-10 (Institute Nacional de Estadistica, Geografia e Informática, Mexico City, 1984).

  19. Pope, K. O., Ocampo, A. C. & Duller, C. E. Nature 351, 105 (1991).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. Perry, E. C., Marin, L., McClain, J. & Veláquez, G. Geology 23, 17–20 (1995).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. Johnson, K. S. & Smith, D. (abstr.) in Ames Structure and Similar Features—A Workshop 36 (Oklahoma Geol. Surv., Norman, OK, 1995).

  22. Hildebrand, A. R. thesis, Univ. Arizona, (1992).

  23. Sandwell, D. T., Yale, M. M. & Smith, W. H. F. (abstr.) Eos 75, 155 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Smit, J. Nature 368, 809–810 (1994).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hildebrand, A., Pilkington, M., Connors, M. et al. Size and structure of the Chicxulub crater revealed by horizontal gravity gradients and cenotes. Nature 376, 415–417 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1038/376415a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/376415a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing