Opinion | Published:

Waves from the collisions of comet Shoemaker–Levy 9 with Jupiter

Naturevolume 374pages706708 (1995) | Download Citation

Subjects

Abstract

OBSERVATIONS of the collisions of the fragments of comet Shoemaker–Levy 9 with Jupiter provided an unprecedented opportunity to probe the depths of the planet's atmosphere. Images taken by the Hubble Space Telescope revealed circular rings surrounding five of the impact sites1. The rings were observed for up to 2.5 hours after the impacts and spread at a constant velocity of 450 m s -1. There are three types of disturbance that might explain these observations: acoustic waves trapped at the tropopause temperature minimum2, gravity waves propagating vertically and horizontally in the stratosphere3, and gravity waves trapped in a stable layer which acts as a horizontal waveguide and is located within the hypothesized tropospheric water cloud4. Here we show that only the last of these phenomena can match the speed and relative amplitude of the observed waves, with the requirement that the impacts were deep and the stability of the trapping layer is large. The origin of the stable layer is still uncertain, but if it is produced by moist convection in the water cloud, then the ratio of oxygen to hydrogen on Jupiter must be surprisingly large— approximately ten times that on the Sun.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1

    Hammel, H. B. et al. Science 267, 1288–1296 (1995).

  2. 2

    Kanamori, H. Geophys. Res. Lett. 20, 2921–2924 (1993).

  3. 3

    Harrington, J., LeBeau, R. P., Backes, K. A. & Dowling, T. E. Nature 368, 525–527 (1994).

  4. 4

    Ingersoll, A. P., Kanamori, H. & Dowling, T. E. Geophys. Res. Lett. 21, 1083–1086 (1994).

  5. 5

    West, R. A. et al. Science 267, 1296–1301 (1995).

  6. 6

    Goldreich, P. & Kumar, P. Astrophys. J. 363, 694–704 (1990).

  7. 7

    Lindal, G. F. et al. J. Geophys. Res. 86, 8721–8727 (1981).

  8. 8

    Carlson, R. W. et al. Geophys. Res. Lett. (in the press).

  9. 9

    Achterberg, R. K. & Ingersoll, A. P. J. atmos. Sci. 46, 2448–2462 (1989).

  10. 10

    Lindzen, R. S., Batten, E. S. & Kim, J. W. Mon. Weath. Rev. 96, 133–140 (1968).

  11. 11

    Bjoraker, G. L., Larson, H. P. & Kunde, V. G. Icarus 66, 579–609 (1986).

  12. 12

    Carlson, B. E., Lacis, A. A. & Rossow, W. B. Astrophys. J. 388, 648–668 (1992).

  13. 13

    Gautier, D. & Owen, T. in Origin and Evolution of Planetary and Satellite Atmospheres (eds Atreya, S. K., Pollack, J. B. & Matthews, M. S.) 487–512 (Univ. Arizona Press, Tucson, 1989).

  14. 14

    Hubbard, W. B. in Origin and Evolution of Planetary and Satellite Atmospheres (eds Atreya, S. K., Pollack, J. B. & Matthews, M. S.) 539–563 (Univ. Arizona Press, Tucson, 1989).

  15. 15

    Guillot, T., Chabrier, G., Morel, P. & Gautier, D. Icarus 112, 354–357 (1994).

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, 91125, USA

    • Andrew P. Ingersoll
    •  & Hiroo Kanamori

Authors

  1. Search for Andrew P. Ingersoll in:

  2. Search for Hiroo Kanamori in:

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Issue Date

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/374706a0

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Newsletter Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing