Sex differences in the functional organization of the brain for language


A MUCH debated question is whether sex differences exist in the functional organization of the brain for language1–4. A long-held hypothesis posits that language functions are more likely to be highly lateralized in males and to be represented in both cerebral hemispheres in females5,6, but attempts to demonstrate this have been inconclusive7–17. Here we use echo-planar functional magnetic resonance imaging18–21 to study 38 right-handed subjects (19 males and 19 females) during orthographic (letter recognition), phonological (rhyme) and semantic (semantic category) tasks. During phonological tasks, brain activation in males is lateralized to the left inferior frontal gyrus regions; in females the pattern of activation is very different, engaging more diffuse neural systems that involve both the left and right inferior frontal gyrus. Our data provide clear evidence for a sex difference in the functional organization of the brain for language and indicate that these variations exist at the level of phonological processing.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.


  1. 1

    Halpern, D. Sex Differences in Cognitive Abilities 1–308 (Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Hellige, J. Hemispheric Asymmetry: What's Right and What's Left 1–396 (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Laccino, J. Left Brain–Right Brain Differences: Inquiries, Evidence, and New Approaches 1–284 (Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    McGlone, J. Behavl. Brain Sci. 3, 215–263 (1980).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Levy, J. in The Biology of Behavior (ed. Kiger, J.) (Oregon State University, Corvallis, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Hampson, E. & Kimura, D. in Behavioral Endocrinology (eds Becker, J., Breedlove, S. & Crews, D.) 357–398 (MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Inglis, J. & Lawson, J. Science 212, 693–695 (1981).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    McGlone, J. Brain 100, 775–793 (1977).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Bradshaw, J. & Gates, E. Brain and Language 5, 166–187 (1978).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Harshman, R., Remington, R. & Krashen, S. Sex, Language and the Brain: III, Evidence from Dichotic Listening for Adult Sex Differences in Verbal Lateralization (University of Western Ontario, Canada, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Voyer, D. & Bryden, M. Brain and Cognition 13, 18–29 (1990).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Kulynych, J., Vladar, K., Jones, D. & Weinberger, D. Cerebral Cortex 4, 107–118 (1994).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Witelson, S. & Kigar, D. J. comp. Neurol. 323, 326–340 (1992).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Bryden, M. in Handbook of Dichotic Listening (ed. Hugdahl, K.) 1–43 (Wiley, Chichester, UK, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Hines, M. in Hormones, Brain and Behavior in Vertebrates: I., Sexual Differentiation, Neuroanatomical Aspects, Neurotransmitters and Neuropeptides (ed. Balthazart, J.) 51–63 (Karger, Basel, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Efron, R. The Decline and Fall of Hemispheric Specialization 1–117 (Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Teng, E. Neuropsychologia 19, 235–240 (1981).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    Kwong, K. K. et al. Proc. nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A 89, 5675–5679 (1992).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    Ogawa, S. et al. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 89, 5951–5955 (1992).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    McCarthy, G., Blamire, A. M., Rothman, D. L., Gruetter, R. & Shulman, R. G. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 90, 4952–4956 (1993).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    Shaywitz, B. A. et al. Hum. Brain Mapping 2, 21–30 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  22. 22

    Lukatela, G. & Turvey, M. J. exp. Psych. 17, 951–966 (1991).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    Pugh, K., Rexer, K. & Katz, L. J. exp. Psych. 20, 807–825 (1994).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. 24

    Demonet, J. F., et al. Brain 115, 1753–1768 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25

    Demonet, J. F., Price, C., Wise, R. & Frackowiak, R. S. J. Brain 117, 671–682 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26

    Petersen, S. E. & Fiez, J. A. A. Rev. Neurosci. 1, 509–530 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27

    Demonet, J. F., Wise, R. & Frackowiak, R. S. J. Hum. Brain Mapping 1, 39–47 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28

    Frackowiak, R. S. J. Trends Neurosci. 17, 109–115 (1994).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29

    Talairach, J. & Tournoux, P. Coplanar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain. Three-dimensional Proportional System: An Approach to Cerebral Imaging (Thieme, New York, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  30. 30

    Friston, K. J., Frith, C. D. & Frackowiak, R. S. J. Hum. Brain Mapping 1, 69–79 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information



Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shaywitz, B., Shaywltz, S., Pugh, K. et al. Sex differences in the functional organization of the brain for language. Nature 373, 607–609 (1995).

Download citation

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing