Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Cost of mating in Drosophila melanogaster females is mediated by male accessory gland products

Abstract

FEMALE Drosophila melanogaster with environmentally1–3 or genetically4 elevated rates of mating die younger than controls. This cost of mating is not attributable to receipt of sperm5. We demonstrate here that seminal fluid products from the main cells of the male accessory gland are responsible for the cost of mating in females, and that increasing exposure to these products increases female death rate. Main-cell products are also involved in elevating the rate of female egg-laying, in reducing female receptivity to further matings and in removing or destroying sperm of previous mates6–12. The cost of mating to females may therefore represent a side-effect of evolutionary conflict between males13.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Fowler, K. & Partridge, L. Nature 338, 760–761 (1989).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Patridge, L. & Fowler, K. J. insect Physiol. 36, 419–425 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chapman, T. J. Insect Physiol. 38, 223–227 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Trevitt, S. thesis, Univ. Edinburgh (1989).

  5. Chapman, T., Hutchings, J. & Partridge, L. Proc. R. Soc. B 253, 211–217 (1993).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hihara, F. Zool. Mag. (Tokyo) 90, 307–316 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Manning, A. An. Behav. 15, 239–250 (1967).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Scott, D. An. Behav. 35, 142–149 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chen, P. et al. Cell 54, 291–298 (1988).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Aigaki, T., Fleischmann, I., Chen, P. S. & Kubli, E. Neuron 7, 557–563 (1991).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Harshman, L. G. & Prout, T. Evolution (in the press).

  12. Kalb, J. M., DiBenedetto, A. J. & Wolfner, M. F. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 90, 8093–8097 (1993).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Trivers, R. L. in Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man (ed. Campbell, B.) 136–179 (Aldine, Chicago, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bertram, M. J., Akerkar, G. A., Ard, R. L., Gonzalez, C. & Wolfner, M. F. Mech. Dev. 38, 33–40 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Meikle, D. B., Sheehan, K. B., Phillis, D. M. & Richmond, R. C. J. insect Physiol. 36, 93–101 (1990).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Cavener, D. R. & Maclntyre, R. J. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 80, 6286–6288 (1983).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Monsma, S. A. & Wolfner, M. F. Genes Dev. 2, 1063–1073 (1988).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. DiBenedetto, H. A., Harada, H. A. & Wolfner, M. F. Devl Biol. 139, 134–148 (1990).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Ludwig, M. Z. et al. Biochem. Genet. 29, 215–240 (1991).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Bairati, A. & Perotti, M. E. Drosophila information Service 45, 67–68 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Partridge, L., Green, A. & Fowler, K. J. Insect Physiol. 33, 745–749 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Boswell, R. E. & Mahowald, A. P. Cell 43, 97–104 (1985).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Aguadé, M., Miyashita, N. & Langley, C. H. Genetics 132, 755–770 (1992).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Van Valen, L. M. Evol. Theory 7, 93–106 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Trevitt, S., Fowler, K. & Partridge, L. J. Insect Physiol. 34, 821–828 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Chapman, T., Trevitt, S. & Partridge, L. J. evol. Biol. 7, 51–69 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Dixon, W. J. BMDP Statistical Software Manual Vol. 2 (Berkley Press, California, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Rice, W. R. Evolution 43, 223–225 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chapman, T., Liddle, L., Kalb, J. et al. Cost of mating in Drosophila melanogaster females is mediated by male accessory gland products. Nature 373, 241–244 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1038/373241a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/373241a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing