Abstract
EFFICIENT behaviour in the visual environment requires selection between stimuli competing for control of action. Many current models of selection are spatial: relevant objects are chosen by attending to their locations1–3. The unilateral stimulus extinction observed following lesions of the parietal lobe provides evidence for spatial selection4. Such patients may identify a single stimulus presented in their contralesional field, but can fail to detect the same stimulus when a competing stimulus is shown simultaneously on the ipsilesional side5. Here we demonstrate that extinction need not be spatial in nature, but may be determined by characteristics of the objects to be selected. In two patients with parietal lobe lesions and poor spatial localization, pictures extinguished words and closed shapes extinguished open shapes. This object-based extinction indicates the existence of biases within non-spatial selection mechanisms which are independent of biases produced by spatial selection mechanisms. We suggest that selection of objects for action requires that the 'winners' produced by the independent competitive biases for selection are bound together within distinct neural areas concerned with object properties and space.
Access options
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
$199.00
only $3.90 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Rent or Buy article
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
from$8.99
All prices are NET prices.
References
- 1
Posner, M. I. Quart. J. exp. Psychol. 32, 3–25 (1980).
- 2
Moran, J. & Desimone, R. Science 229, 782–784 (1985).
- 3
Mozer, M. C. & Behrmann, M. J. cog. Neurosci. 2, 96–123 (1989).
- 4
Posner, M. I., Walker, J. A., Friedrich, F. J. & Rafal, R. D. J. Neurosci. 4, 1863–1874 (1984).
- 5
Critchley, M. The Parietal Lobes (Edward Arnold, London, 1953).
- 6
Balint, R. Monatsch. für Psychiat. Neurol. 25, 51–81.
- 7
Coslett, B. & Saffran, E. Brain 114, 1523–1545 (1991).
- 8
Humphreys, G. W. & Riddoch, M. J. in Attention and Performance XIV (MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1993).
- 9
Egly, R., Driver, J. & Rafal, R. D. J. exp. Psychol.: General 123, 161–177 (1994).
- 10
Driver, J. & Halligan, P. W. Cog. Neurosci. 8, 475–496 (1991).
- 11
Kroll, J. F. & Potter, M. C. J. verb. Learn. verb. Behav. 23, 39–66 (1984).
- 12
Humphreys, G. W. Quart. J. exp. Psychol. 33A, 17–31 (1981).
- 13
Potter, M. C. & Faulconer, B. Nature 253, 437–438 (1975).
- 14
Biederman, I. Psychol. Rev. 94, 115–147 (1987).
- 15
Ungerleider, L. G. & Mishkin, M. in Analysis of Visual Behavior (MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1982).
- 16
Duncan, J. Perception 22, 1261–1270 (1993).
Author information
Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Humphreys, G., Romani, C., Olson, A. et al. Non-spatial extinction following lesions of the parietal lobe in humans. Nature 372, 357–359 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1038/372357a0
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
Further reading
-
Topological difference between target and flankers alleviates crowding effect
Journal of Vision (2020)
-
Feature-based attentional selection affects the perceived duration of a stimulus having two superposed patterns
Vision Research (2019)
-
Processing of performance-matched visual object categories: faces and places are related to lower processing load in the frontoparietal executive network than other objects
European Journal of Neuroscience (2018)
-
Attention as the ‘glue’ for object integration in parietal extinction
Cortex (2018)
-
Ventral lateral parietal cortex and episodic memory retrieval
Cortex (2018)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.