FLUCTUATING asymmetry (FA) refers to the random, stress-induced deviations from perfect symmetry that develop during the growth of bilaterally symmetrical traits1,2. Individual differences in the level of FA may influence mate choice3: in a number of species, females prefer to mate with males that have more symmetrical sexual ornaments4–7. As the degree of FA has been shown to reflect the ability of individuals to cope with a wide variety of environ-mental stresses2,8,9, it has been suggested that mating preferences for symmetry evolve for adaptive reasons, because the degree of FA provides honest information about male quality10,11. Here I use simple, artificial neural networks to show that such preferences are likely to arise in the absence of any link between symmetry and quality, as a by-product of selection for mate recognition.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Open Access articles citing this article.
Scientific Reports Open Access 11 January 2021
Scientific Reports Open Access 19 April 2018
Ecological Research Open Access 11 November 2017
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Van Valen, L. Evolution 16, 125–142 (1962).
Palmer, A. R. & Strobeck, C. A. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 17, 391–421 (1986).
Watson, P. J. & Thornhill, R. Trends Ecol. Evol. 9, 21–25 (1994).
Møller, A. P. Nature 357, 238–240 (1992).
Møller, A. P. Behavl Ecol. Sociobiol. 32, 371–376 (1993).
Swaddle, J. P. & Cuthill, I. C. Nature 367, 165–166 (1994).
Radesäter, T. & Halldórsdóttir, H. Anim. Behav. 45, 626–628 (1993).
Leary, R. & Allendorf, F. W. Trends Ecol. Evol. 4, 214–217 (1989).
Parsons, P. A. Biol. Rev. 65, 131–145 (1990).
Møller, A. P. Anim. Behav. 40, 1185–1187 (1990).
Møller, A. P. & Pomiankowski, A. Behavl Ecol. Sociobiol. 32, 167–176 (1993).
Zahavi, A. J. theor. Biol. 53, 205–214 (1975).
Packer, C. & Pusey, A. E. Nature 362, 595 (1993).
Harvey, I. F. & Walsh, K. J. Ecol. Entomol. 18, 198–202 (1993).
Enquist, M. & Arak, A. Nature 361, 446–448 (1993).
Arak, A. & Enquist, M. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B340, 207–213 (1993).
Staddon, J. E. R. Am. Nat. 109, 541–545 (1975).
Leimar, O., Enquist, M. & Sillen-Tullberg, B. Am. Nat. 128, 469–490 (1986).
Ryan, M. J. Oxf. Surv. Evol. Biol. 7, 157–195 (1990).
Ryan, M. J. & Keddy-Hector, A. Am. Nat. 139, S4–S35 (1992).
Ryan, M. J. & Rand, A. S. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B340, 187–195 (1993).
About this article
Cite this article
Johnstone, R. Female preference for symmetrical males as a by-product of selection for mate recognition. Nature 372, 172–175 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1038/372172a0
This article is cited by
Scientific Reports (2021)
Scientific Reports (2018)
Ecological Research (2018)
Scientific Reports (2017)
Clinical Oral Investigations (2015)