Main

Many types of extracellular matrix components are present in the liver including different fibrillar (types I, III, V, and VI) and nonfibrillar (types IV and XVIII) collagens, non collagenic glycoproteins such as fibronectins, laminins, and osteonectin/SPARC, and proteoglycans (eg syndecans, glypican). In normal liver, low amounts of extracellular matrix are observed mainly located around centrilobular veins, along sinusoids in Disse space and in portal zones. In liver fibrosis, an extensive deposition of extracellular matrix can be observed where type I collagen becomes pre-eminent.

While it is well established that the hepatic stellate cells (HSC) play an important role in extracellular matrix deposition and liver fibrogenesis,1, 2 other fibroblastic cells can also be involved in the development of liver fibrosis. Specifically, it has been shown that portal fibroblasts are involved in the fibrotic lesions that develop around portal areas following bile duct ligation in the rat.3, 4, 5 Indeed, after bile duct ligation, a marked and transient proliferation of bile duct epithelial cells is observed, associated with proliferation of portal periductular fibroblasts, which rapidly acquire a myofibroblastic α-smooth muscle actin expressing phenotype.3 Identification of differentially expressed markers has added further evidence for the heterogeneity of liver fibrogenic cells.6, 7, 8, 9

We have previously described the presence of fibrillin-1 in normal and pathological human liver.10 Fibrillin-rich microfibrils are important structural elements widely expressed in connective tissues. Depending on the location, microfibrils, and microfibril-associated glycoproteins may be associated with an amorphous elastin core to form elastic fibers. In normal human liver, fibrillin-1 and elastin colocalized in the vessel walls and in the portal tract connective tissue; fibrillin-1 alone was detected along sinusoids. Sinusoids in cirrhotic nodules and fibrotic septa surrounding the nodules were usually rich in fibrillin-1. In hepatocellular carcinomas, fibrillin-1 was present between tumoral hepatocytes and in the stromal reaction around the tumors. We have also observed that fibrillin-1 expression is decreased around bile ducts in children with several types of biliary diseases, suggesting that the mechanical properties of fibrillin-1 may be involved in the regulation of bile flow.11 Moreover, fibrillin may act as a classical adhesion protein as it contains an Arg-Gly-Asp (RGD) motif that interacts with the integrin αVβ3.12, 13 However, the roles played by microfibrils remain to be elucidated even if new approaches have begun to reveal important insights into their biochemical properties, particularly, their extensible properties and their relevance in dynamic connective tissues with long-range elasticity.14

The aim of this study was to analyze the fibrillin-1 expression by the different (myo)fibroblastic subpopulations of normal and fibrotic rat liver; the expression of fibrillin-1 and of elastin were compared. The role of the profibrogenic mediator transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1) and of mechanical stress on fibrillin-1 expression and modulation was studied in cultures of liver fibroblastic cells. Finally, we also measured the effect of fibrillin-1 fragments on cell adhesion.

Materials and methods

Experimental Animals

Male Sprague-Dawley rats (initial body weight about 200 g) were used. Four animals were used in each experimental group. In the first group, animals were subjected to common bile duct ligation as described before.3 The animals were killed at 72 h, 5 and 7 days after bile duct ligation. In the second group, animals were given carbon tetrachloride (CCl4) (375 μl/kg of body weight in olive oil per os) three times per week. The animals were killed 48 h after the first CCl4 treatment and at 96 h, 2 and 6 weeks. Control animals were used in each case: sham-operated for the bile duct ligation model, and olive oil per os for the CCl4 model; furthermore, some animals did not undergo any treatment. No differences were observed between all these control groups. All experiments were performed using accepted ethical guidelines.

Processing of Rat Liver Tissue

A part of fresh tissue samples was routinely formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded; sections were stained with hematoxylin-eosin for routine histology and with Sirius red (saturated picric acid in distilled water containing 0.1% (w/v) Sirius red F3B (BDH Chemicals Ltd., Poole, UK)) to allow visualization of fibrosis.15 A part was immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen-cooled isopentane and stored at −80°C; five μm-thick serial frozen sections of each sample were air-dried on Super frost/plus slides (Menzel Glaser, Germany) and processed for immunostaining.

Cell Culture

Rat portal fibroblasts were obtained by outgrowth from the biliary tree isolated after collagenase digestion as previously described.9 An immortalized rat HSC line (HSC-T6) obtained by transfection of 15-day-old cultured primary HSC with a cDNA in which the expression of the large T-antigen of SV40 is driven by the Rous sarcoma virus promoter 16 was used; HSC-T6 retain all features of activated hepatic stellate cells, including the expression of desmin, of α-smooth muscle actin, and of glial acidic fibrillary protein, and can esterify retinol into retinyl esters.17 Human hepatic myofibroblasts were obtained from explants of nontumoral liver resected during partial hepatectomy and characterized as previously described.18, 19 These human hepatic myofibroblasts were found to express two markers of portal fibroblasts, fibulin-2 and interleukin-6, and not the protease P100, a marker for hepatic stellate cells.20 Cells were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM, Life Technologies, Cergy Pontoise, France) supplemented with 100 IU/ml penicillin and 100 μg/ml streptomycin (Life Technologies), at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere of 95% air and 5% CO2. Rat portal fibroblasts and HSC-T6 were grown in DMEM containing 10% fetal calf serum (FCS, Life Technologies); human hepatic myofibroblasts were grown in DMEM containing 5% FCS, 5% pooled human AB serum and 5 ng/ml recombinant human epidermal growth factor (R&D Systems, Oxon, UK). When cells reached confluence, they were trypsinized and passaged. To study the effect of recombinant human TGF-β1 (PeproTech, Inc., Rocky Hill, NJ, USA) on fibrillin-1 expression, TGF-β1 was added (5 ng/ml) or not on rat or human confluent cells cultured in DMEM containing 1 or 10% FCS, and immunofluorescence was performed at 3 days after treatment.21

Collagen Lattices

Rat portal fibroblasts or human hepatic myofibroblasts were cultured in collagen lattices. The stock soluble native collagen type I was prepared from rat tails as previously described22 and stored at 4°C in 0.1 M acetic acid at 3 mg/ml. Fibroblast-populated collagen lattices were manufactured by mixing 1.75 ml of DMEM, 0.5 ml FCS, 1.5 ml collagen solution, 0.25 ml NaOH 0.1 N, and 1 ml of DMEM containing 1 × 106 fibroblasts released from monolayer culture by trypsinization. This solution (5 ml) was poured in 60-mm Petri dishes. Dishes were incubated at 37°C and a collagen gel with embedded cells formed within 15 min. These dishes either did or did not contain four plastic poles, arranged in a square and glued onto the dish with epoxy glue. Within a floating collagen gel obtained in dishes without plastic poles (unrestrained lattices), the cells slowly contract the gel isotonically, and strain is low; if the gel is anchored to the culture dish with plastic poles (restrained lattices), the cells experience mechanical strain comparable to that observed in contracting skin wounds.23 After 2 and 5 days in culture, unrestrained (n=5) and restrained (n=5) fibroblast-populated collagen lattices were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen-cooled isopentane and stored at −80°C; 10 μm-thick serial frozen sections of each sample were air-dried on Super frost/plus slides (Menzel Glaser) and processed for immunofluorescence.

Adhesion Assay

Adhesion of human hepatic myofibroblasts to ligand-coated plastic wells for 30–60 min followed by a colorimetric detection of adhering cells was performed according to a previously published protocol.24, 25 Briefly, 96-well tissue culture plates were coated with serial dilutions (in triplicate) of extracellular matrix substrates (20–0.31 μg/ml, 100 μl/well) by overnight adsorption at 4°C. After saturation of the wells with 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA, fraction V, Sigma Chemical Company, St Louis, MO, USA), the plates were immediately used for cell adhesion assays in serum-free medium. Cells were added to the wells, and 30 min after cell seeding, nonadherent and loosely attached cells were removed by aspirating the solution and gentle washing in phosphate-buffered saline. To determine the extent of adhesion, adherent cells were fixed with 1% glutaraldehyde in phosphate-buffered saline and stained with 0.1% crystal violet; after extensive washing, the dye was solubilized in Triton X-100, and optical density measured at 750 nm with an ELISA reader (Labsystems, Vantaa, Finland). Native human fibronectin (gift of Dr Coussen-Choquet, CNRS UMR 5091, Université Victor Segalen, Bordeaux, France), rat-tail collagen type I, and the recombinant fibrillin-1 polypeptides rF16 (N-terminal half of fibrillin-1) and rF6 H (C-terminal half of fibrillin-1)26 were used.

Antibodies

For immunohistochemistry and/or immunofluorescence on tissue sections or cultured cells, the following antibodies were used: a polyclonal antiserum produced according to standard procedures in rabbit using the recombinant C-terminal half of human fibrillin-1 rF6H as antigen;27 a monoclonal antibody (IgG2a) recognizing exclusively α-smooth muscle actin selected and characterized after immunization of BALB/c mice with the NH2-terminal synthetic decapeptide of α-smooth muscle actin coupled to keyhole limpet hemocyanina (Dako A/S, Glostrup, Denmark);28 and a rabbit polyclonal antiserum against elastin from rat aorta characterized by radioimmunoassay (Novotec, Lyon, France).29 All of these antibodies have been extensively used on rat tissues and their specificity has been clearly documented.

Immunostaining

For immunohistochemistry, formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded sections were incubated with the rabbit polyclonal antibody against fibrillin-1, and treated with the DAKO Envision-horseradish peroxidase system (Dako A/S) as previously described.9 For immunofluorescence, frozen sections (tissues and collagen lattices) fixed in cold acetone or cultured cells fixed and permeabilized in cold methanol were incubated with either mouse monoclonal or rabbit polyclonal antibodies. Oregon green 488-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR, USA) and Alexa Fluor 594-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (Molecular Probes) were used for the second step. For double immunofluorescence, mouse monoclonal and rabbit polyclonal antibodies were mixed as well as the second antibodies. In collagen lattices and cultured cells, nuclei were stained with DAPI (Sigma Chemical Company). Frozen sections (tissues and collagen lattices) or cultured cells were mounted in antifade mounting medium. Immunostaining were examined with a Zeiss Axioplan 2 microscope (Carl Zeiss Microscopy, Jena, Germany) equipped with epiillumination and specific filters for immunofluorescence analysis. Images were acquired with an AxioCam camera (Carl Zeiss Vision, Hallbergmoos, Germany) by means of the AxioVision image processing and analysis system (Carl Zeiss Vision). Double stainings with green and red fluorescence were artificially treated to evaluate the areas of colocalization (in yellow) using the AxioVision software (Carl Zeiss Vision).

Immunofluorescence Quantitative Evaluation and Statistical Analysis

Quantitative evaluation of the staining in cultured cells and collagen lattices was performed using a Zeiss Axioplan 2 microscope (Carl Zeiss Microscopy). Images were acquired with an AxioCam camera (Carl Zeiss Vision) by means of the Axiovision image processing and analysis system (Carl Zeiss Vision) and quantitative data of fibrillin-1 staining were obtained using a computerized image analysis system (KS300, Carl Zeiss Vision). The analysis was performed on an average of 20 fields per condition using the × 10 objective. Immunofluorescence staining was expressed as a percentage of stained areas per field. Data were calculated as mean values ±SEM, and followed a Gaussian distribution. Then, a Student's t-test for unpaired samples was used for statistical analysis. A P<0.05 was considered significant.

Results

Hematoxylin–eosin and Sirius Red Staining Examination in Normal and Fibrotic Rat Liver

In normal liver, Sirius red staining was observed almost exclusively in vessel walls, around centrilobular veins and around bile ducts and vessels in portal connective tissue. At 72 h after bile duct ligation, bile ductule proliferation was obvious, while very few inflammatory cells were detected in the portal tracts. At this time, fibrous tissue deposition in portal areas was noted as previously described.4 At 5 and 7 days after bile duct ligation, bile ductule proliferation progressively penetrated into the parenchyma with a parallel deposition of Sirius red-stained materials. In CCl4-treated animals, a marked inflammatory reaction and hepatocytic necrosis were observed around centrilobular veins at 48 h. Occasionally, bridging necrosis was observed. Histological signs of liver necrosis peaked at 48 h after a single dose of CCl4. Then, fibrotic lesions developed with a progressive accumulation of Sirius red-stained materials around centrilobular veins leading to the formation of septa.

Fibrillin-1 Expression during Experimental Liver Fibrosis

In normal rat liver, fibrillin-1 was strongly expressed in the portal connective tissue, in portal vessel walls, around and in the walls of the centrilobular veins (Figure 1a and b); fibrillin-1 expression along the sinusoids was very low (Figure 1a and b). α-Smooth muscle actin was expressed exclusively in vessel walls (portal vessels and centrilobular veins) (Figure 1a and b). Double immunofluorescence showed the close relationship between fibrillin-1 and α-smooth muscle actin in vessel walls (Figure 1a and b).

Figure 1
figure 1

Double immunofluorescence staining for fibrillin-1 (in red) and α-smooth muscle actin (in green) in control rat liver (a, b), after bile duct ligation for 72 h (c) and 7 days (e), and after CCl4 treatment for 2 (d) and 6 weeks (f). A yellow color indicates a colocalization. In control rats, fibrillin-1 is present in vessel wall where it colocalizes with α-smooth muscle actin, and in connective tissue in portal zone (a) and around centrilobular vein (b). A very slight staining for fibrillin-1 is observed in sinusoids (a, b). Inset in (b) illustrates with immunoperoxidase staining the low fibrillin-1 expression level along sinusoids. After bile duct ligation (c, e), fibrillin-1 expression colocalizes with α-smooth muscle actin-positive proliferating cells; this deposition is particularly abundant in myofibroblastic layers around bile ductules (BD). After CCl4 treatment (d, f), around centrilobular vein (CLV) and in septa (S), fibrillin-1 expression colocalizes with α-smooth muscle actin-positive proliferating cells (b, inset: bar, 200 μm).

After bile duct ligation, we focused our analysis on the portal zones in which the lesion developed. At 72 h after bile duct ligation (Figure 1c), fibrillin-1 expression was present around proliferating bile ductules where α-smooth muscle actin expression increased. After bile duct ligation for 7 days, myofibroblastic cells form dense onion-like layers around biliary structures where fibrillin-1 and α-smooth muscle actin appeared colocalized (Figure 1e). Furthermore, fibrillin-1 deposition was also observed around α-smooth muscle actin-positive cells invading the parenchyma (Figure 1e).

After CCl4 treatment, the injured centrilobular vein areas were analyzed. At 15 days after the beginning of the CCl4 treatment, the majority of myofibroblastic cells expressing α-smooth muscle actin expressed also fibrillin-1 (Figure 1d). After CCl4 treatment for 6 weeks, there was a colocalization of fibrillin-1 and of α-smooth muscle actin in the dense septa which developed between centrilobular vein areas (Figure 1f).

Expression of Elastin by α-Smooth Muscle Actin Expressing Myofibroblasts

After bile duct ligation for 7 days, a patchy elastin deposition was observed in the connective tissue of enlarged portal zones containing α-smooth muscle actin-positive myofibroblastic cells; elastin was also present in vessel wall (Figure 2a). In CCl4-treated animals for 6 weeks, a colocalization of elastin and of α-smooth muscle actin was observed in fibrous septa (Figure 2b); interestingly, elastin deposition was not observed around α-smooth muscle actin-positive stellate cells of the parenchyma (Figure 2b, arrows).

Figure 2
figure 2

Double immunofluorescence staining for elastin (in red) and α-smooth muscle actin (in green) after bile duct ligation for 7 days (a) or after CCl4 treatment for 6 weeks (b). A yellow color indicates a colocalization. In both model (a, b), elastin and α-smooth muscle actin expression are colocalized except in myofibroblastic stellate cells present in the parenchyma of CCl4-treated rats (b, arrows). BD, bile ductule; PA, portal artery; S, septa.

Expression and Modulation of Fibrillin-1 in Cultured Hepatic Fibroblastic Cells

Nontreated cultured rat portal fibroblasts showed a low level of fibrillin-1 expression (Figure 3a). Some extracellular fibrillin-1-containing fibers were observed. Quantitative evaluation (Figure 3c) showed a significantly higher deposition of fibrillin-1 in cells cultured in the presence of 10% FCS (10.3±0.8%) compared with cells cultured in the presence of 1% FCS (5.2±1.0%; P<0.01). Treatment with TGF-β1 greatly increased the expression of fibrillin-1 (Figure 3b). Quantitative evaluation (Figure 3c) showed that the increase was significant in cells cultured in the presence of both 1% FCS (12.5±1.3; P<0.01 compared with nontreated cells) and 10% FCS (17.8±0.5; P<0.01 compared with non-treated cells). These results were not related to changes in cell numbers since, due to contact inhibition, cell number was identical in all the conditions, as shown by quantitative analysis of the DAPI staining. Similar results were obtained with HSC-T6 and human hepatic myofibroblasts. Quantitative evaluation showed a significantly higher deposition of fibrillin-1 in cells cultured in the presence of 10% FCS (5.8±0.5 and 14.5±0.3% in HSC-T6 and human hepatic myofibroblasts, respectively) compared with cells cultured in the presence of 1% FCS (3.2±0.3 and 9.6±0.7% in HSC-T6 and human hepatic myofibroblasts, respectively; P<0.02). Treatment with TGF-β1 significantly increased the expression of fibrillin-1 in cells cultured in the presence of both 1% FCS (7.5±1.0 and 17.8±0.7 in HSC-T6 and human hepatic myofibroblasts, respectively; P<0.01 compared with nontreated cells) and 10% FCS (12.7±0.5 and 21.4±1.2 in HSC-T6 and human hepatic myofibroblasts, respectively; P<0.01 compared with nontreated cells).

Figure 3
figure 3

Fibrillin-1 (a, b) immunofluorescence staining of nontreated (a) and TGF-β1-treated (b) portal fibroblasts in the presence of 1% FCS. Fibrillin-1 expression is increased by TGF-β1 treatment. Fibrillin-1 immunostaining quantitative analysis (c) shows a significant increase in fibrillin-1 expression in cells cultured in 10% FCS compared with cells cultured with 1% FCS, and in TGF-β1-treated cells compared with nontreated cells.

To detect modifications of fibrillin-1 expression that may be induced under conditions of mechanical stress, we analyzed cells (rat portal fibroblasts and human hepatic myofibroblasts) cultured in restrained vs unrestrained collagen gels. Indeed, fibroblasts cultured within collagen lattices exert tractional forces leading to the retraction of unrestrained, floating collagen lattices and to the development of tension in attached, restrained (stressed) collagen lattices.30 At the beginning of the culture, the collagen matrix covered the entire dish. Within 2 days, the fibroblasts in the unrestrained collagen gels contracted the matrix to a small disc. In collagen gels restrained with plastic poles, the partially contracted gel had the shape of a stretched rubber sheet. Between 2 and 5 days in culture, a significant increase of the fibrillin-1 expression was observed in both unrestrained and restrained fibroblast-populated collagen lattices (Table 1). However, at both times, the level of expression was significantly higher in restrained (stressed) fibroblast-populated collagen lattices compared with unrestrained fibroblast-populated collagen lattices (Table 1).

Table 1 Quantitative evaluation of fibrillin-1 expression in unrestrained and restrained fibroblast-populated collagen latticesa

Adhesion assays were performed with human hepatic myofibroblasts using a range of concentrations of extracellular matrix proteins (0.31–20 μg/ml). Cell adhesion on collagen type I was already maximal at the lowest concentration tested (Figure 4a). At 0.31 μg/ml, the adhesion capacities of the cells on fibronectin, rF6H (C-terminal half containing a cell binding RGD motif) and rF16 (N-terminal half) recombinant fibrillin-1 fragments were equivalent (Figure 4a). When concentration increased, cell adhesion on fibronectin increased to reach a plateau at 2.5 μg/ml, adhesion on rF6H fibrillin-1 fragment slightly increased then decreased at concentrations higher than 2.5 μg/ml, while adhesion on rF16 fibrillin-1 fragment was dose-dependently inhibited (Figure 4a). The effects of fibrillin-1 fragments on collagen type I and fibronectin-induced cell adhesion were then studied. The concentrations of collagen type I and of fibronectin chosen were 0.31 and 2.5 μg/ml, respectively. The presence of fibrillin-1 fragments did not significantly modify adhesion of the cells to collagen type I (Figure 4b). On fibronectin, the rF6 H fragment of fibrillin-1 did not significantly modify cell adhesion on fibronectin while the rF16 fragment decreased cell adhesion from 2.5 μg/ml (87% adhesion compared to fibronectin alone) to inhibit almost totally cell adhesion on fibronectin at 10 μg/ml (13% adhesion compared to fibronectin alone; Figure 4c). Figure 4d and e illustrates the reduced adhesion and spreading of cells on fibronectin in the presence of rF16 fibrillin-1 fragment.

Figure 4
figure 4

Adhesion tests. In (a), adhesion of myofibroblasts on increasing amounts of collagen type I, fibronectin, and rF6H or rF16 fibrillin-1 fragments is tested; cell adhesion on collagen type I is already maximal at the lowest concentration tested. At 0.31 μg/ml, the adhesion capacities of the cells on fibronectin, rF6H and rF16 recombinant fibrillin-1 fragments are equivalent. When concentration increases, cell adhesion on fibronectin increases, adhesion on rF6H fibrillin-1 fragment slightly increases then decreases, while adhesion on rF16 fibrillin-1 fragment is dose-dependently inhibited. In (b), cell adhesion on collagen type I is not significantly modified by the addition of fibrillin-1 fragments; in contrast, cell adhesion on fibronectin is decreased by the rF16 fibrillin-1 fragment (c). Each point represents the average of triplicate wells. SEMs are not represented in figures but were always lower than 2% of values. (d) and (e) illustrate cell adhering on fibronectin (2.5 μg/ml) alone (d) or in the presence of 5 μg/ml rF16 fragment (50% adhesion compared to fibronectin alone) (e). Cells were stained with 0.1% crystal violet 30 min after seeding.

Discussion

In this work, we showed that, in normal rat liver, fibrillin-1 is present in portal and peri-centrilobular vein connective tissue. Furthermore, we showed that fibrillin-1 is an important component of the extracellular matrix secreted during experimental rat liver fibrosis. In contrast with human liver,10 fibrillin-1 expression inside the sinusoids of rat liver was either absent or very low. After bile duct ligation or CCl4 treatment, fibrillin-1 expression increased greatly in enlarged portal zones or in pericentrilobular vein areas, respectively.

In normal rat liver, fibrillin-1, and α-smooth muscle actin were colocalized exclusively in vessel walls. After bile duct ligation and CCl4 treatment, fibrillin-1 and α-smooth muscle actin were colocalized in fibrotic lesions. This suggests that α-smooth muscle actin-positive myofibroblasts are responsible for the deposition of extracellular fibrillin-1 observed during fibrogenesis. Elastin and α-smooth muscle actin were colocalized in portal areas after bile duct ligation and in septa developing after CCl4 treatment, but a few activated α-smooth muscle actin-positive HSC in the parenchyma did not express elastin. These observations suggest that different fibroblastic subpopulations of the liver, including HSC and portal fibroblasts, are involved in fibrillin-1 deposition. However, in the CCl4 model and at the times studied, typical activated HSC expressing α-smooth muscle actin and secreting fibrillin-1 are not or are poorly involved in elastin deposition. It has been shown recently that HSC secrete the soluble tropoelastin and that its secretion increases during transdifferentiation to myofibroblast-like cells both in vitro and in vivo,31 but, according to our observations, immunohistochemistry revealed elastin only in the septa.

Our in vitro experiments showed that rat HSC (HSC-T6), rat portal fibroblasts, and human liver myofibroblasts express fibrillin-1 and that TGF-β1 increases fibrillin-1 expression. These results are not unexpected since TGF-β1 plays a major role in liver fibrogenesis and extracellular matrix deposition.32, 33 An overexpression of TGF-β1 has been reported in the two models of fibrogenesis that we have used34, 35 and could thus account for the increased expression of fibrillin-1. TGF-β activity requires the proteolytic cleavage of the latent TGF-β binding protein (LTBP) that releases the latent TGF-β complex, subsequently dissociated yielding the mature TGF-β (for review, see Saharinen36). It has been shown that LTBP interacts with fibrillin and is a microfibril-associated protein.37 It is thus possible that fibrillin-1 interferes with TGF-β bioavailability as recently discussed.38

Fibrillin-1 expression was increased in restrained fibroblast-populated collagen lattices compared with unrestrained fibroblast-populated lattices. The unrestrained fibroblast-populated floating lattices give rise to mechanically relaxed tissue resembling the normal uninjured tissue in which cells develop stellate morphology with long processes.39 In contrast, restrained fibroblast-populated collagen-anchored lattices resemble that of a stressed tissue, such as granulation tissue,39 in which the cells are bipolar and orient along lines of tension. Our results thus illustrate the likely involvement of fibrillin-1 in the mechanical properties of a tissue, fibrillin-1 providing force-bearing structural support as suggested by Ramirez and Pereira.40

Ultrastructural and biochemical studies have shown a direct interaction between fibrillin-1 and the cell surface mediated via a RGD motif and the integrin αVβ3.12, 13 Thus, fibrillin may act as a classical adhesion protein.12, 13, 41, 42 However, our results on human myofibroblasts which express αVβ3 (FACS analysis; A Desmoulière, unpublished observation) demonstrate that recombinant human fibrillin-1 polypeptides, far from being proadhesive, are actually antiadhesive, albeit with distinctive features. Whereas the recombinant human fibrillin-1 polypeptide rF6 H containing the RGD fragment (C-terminal half of fibrillin-1) slightly decreases cell adhesion at high concentrations, its addition does not modify cell adhesion on collagen type I or fibronectin. In contrast, the recombinant human fibrillin-1 polypeptide rF16 (N-terminal half of fibrillin-1) dose-dependently decreases cell adhesion and inhibits cell adhesion on fibronectin, although not on collagen type I. Fibrillin-1 can be cleaved into specific peptides by different matrix metalloproteinases (MMP) including gelatinases MMP-2 and -9, the macrophage metalloelastase MMP-12, the interstitial collagenase MMP-13, the membrane-type MMP-14 (also known as MT-MMP1),43, 44 and the stromelysin MMP-3.43 Thus, it is likely that MMP activity in physiologically and pathologically remodeling connective tissues is able to generate fibrillin-1 fragments displaying different adhesive properties. Owing to their antiadhesive properties, fibrillin-1 fragments could facilitate cell mobilization to the site of injury. In this aspect, fibrillin-1 fragments share similarities to matricelullar proteins (tenascins, thrombospondins, and SPARC) that function as adaptators and modulators of cell–matrix interactions.45, 46

In conclusion, our results show that different (myo)fibroblastic cell subpopulations of the liver synthesize fibrillin-1 and that TGF-β1 induces fibrillin-1 deposition. Furthermore, fibrillin-1 deposition was induced in vitro by mechanical stress. Finally, a recombinant human fibrillin-1 fragment was shown to display antiadhesive properties, suggesting that, during connective tissue remodeling involving proteases, fibrillin-1 fragment can act differently as compared to the intact molecule.