Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Trade-offs among dispersal strategies in British plants

Abstract

TRADE-OFFS are of fundamental importance in population biology. They prevent the evolution of a darwinian demon (a species that breeds fast, lives long and is both a good competitor and disperser) and result in the wide range of life histories we observe in nature1. Trade-offs are also thought to be important in ecology, driving successional change and maintaining species diversity2,3. But the demonstration of trade-offs is difficult4,5. Evolutionary theory predicts trade-offs between seed dormancy and (1) seed weight6 and (2) seed spatial dispersal6,7. Here we present simulation results predicting a third trade-off between seed dormancy and adult longevity. The existence of these trade-offs is tested, to our knowledge for the first time, using modern comparative methods8,9 and data from long-term experiments10& ndash;12. The analyses are consistent with the existence of all three trade-offs in nature.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Law, R. in Population Dynamics (eds Anderson, R. M., Turner, B. D. & Taylor, L. R.) 81–103 (Blackwell, Oxford, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Tilman, D. Resource Competition and Community Structure (Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Shmida, A. & Ellner, S. Vegetatio 58, 29–55 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Partridge, L. & Sibly, R. in The Evolution of Reproductive Strategies (eds Harvey, P. H., Partridge, L. & Southwood, T. R. E.) 3–13 (Royal Society, London, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Maynard Smith, J. in The Evolution of Reproductive Strategies (eds Harvey, P. H., Partridge, L. & Southwood, T. R. E.) 103–104 (Royal Society, London, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Venable, D. L. & Brown, J. S. Am. Nat. 131, 360–384 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bulmer, M. G. Theor. pop. Biol. 26, 376–377 (1984).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Harvey, P. H. & Pagel, The Comparative Method in Evolutionary Biology (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Purvis, A. Comparative Analysis by Independent Contrasts, version 1.2: User's Guide (Oxford University, Oxford, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Roberts, H. A. Weed Research 4, 296–307 (1964).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Roberts, H. A. J. appl. Ecol. 16, 195–201 (1979).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Roberts, H. A. & Boddrell, J. E. Ann. appl. Biol. 103, 301–309 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Cohen, D. J. theor. Biol. 12, 110–129 (1966).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Cohen, D. & Levin, S. A. Theor. pop. Biol. 39, 63–99 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bulmer, M. G. Am. Nat. 126, 63–71 (1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lokesha, R., Hedge, S. G., Uma Shaanker, R. & Gneshaiah, K. N. Am. Nat. 140, 520–525 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ellner, S. J. theor. Biol. 123, 173–185 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Stebbins, G. L. Variation and Evolution in Plants (Columbia Univ. Press, London, 1950).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Cook, R. in Demography and Evolution in Plant Populations (ed. Solbrig, O. T.) 107–129 (Blackwell, Oxford, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Thompson, K. New Phytol. 106, 23–34 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Fenner, M. in Colonisation, Succession and Stability (eds Gray, A. J., Crawley, M. J. & Edwards, P. J.) 103–114 (Blackwell, Oxford, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Waller, D. M. in Plant Reproductive Ecology: Patterns and Strategies (eds Lovett Doust, J. & Lovett Doust, L.) 203–227 (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Fenner, M. Seed Ecology (Chapman & Hall, London, 1985).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  24. Parker, V. T. & Kelly, V. R. in Ecology of Soil Seed Banks (eds Leck, M. A., Parker, V. T. & Simpson, R. L.) 231–255 (Academic, London, 1989).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  25. Rees, M. & Long, M. J. Am. Nat. 141, 233–262 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Grime, J. P., Hodgson, J. G. & Hunt, R. Comparative Plant Ecology: a Functional Approach to Common British Species (Unwin Hyman, London, 1988).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  27. Clapham, A. R., Tutin, T. G. & Moore, D. M. Flora of the British Isles (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Baskin, C. C. & Baskin, J. M. Am. J. Bot. 75, 286–305.

  29. Metz, J. A. J., Nisbet, R. M. & Geritz, S. A. H. Trends Ecol. Evol. 7, 198–202 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Rees, M. Am. Nat. (in the press).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rees, M. Trade-offs among dispersal strategies in British plants. Nature 366, 150–152 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1038/366150a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/366150a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing