Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Oldest known amphisbaenian from the Upper Cretaceous of Chinese Inner Mongolia

Abstract

THE amphisbaenians, lizards and snakes constitute a monophyletic group, the Squamata. Although amphisbaenians are known to have occurred in the Mesozoic1,2, their remains are rare and fragmentary. The oldest and most primitive known skull of an amphisbaenian is from the Eocene of North America3 and differs little from that of modern taxa4–9. A substantial structural gap exists between this skull and that of the several possible sister groups8,10. No derived features uniquely linking amphisbaenians to any other group of the Squamata have been recognized, so the relationship of amphisbaenians is uncertain11,12. We report here on the late Cretaceous lizard-like amphisbaenian represented by well-preserved cranial and postcranial material from the Bayan Mandahu redbeds of the Gobi Desert, Inner Mongolia, China. This material documents the oldest and most primitive amphisbaenian yet known, and permits a re-evaluation of the relationship between the amphisbaenians and other squamates.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Borsuk-Bialynicka, M. Cretac. Res. 12, 607–608 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Astibia, H. et al. Terra Res. 2, 460–466 (1991).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Berman, D. Copeia 4, 704–721 (1973).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gilmore, C. Mem. natn. Acad. Sci. 22, 1–197 (1928).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Taylor, E. H. Kans. Univ. Sci. Bull. 34, 521–579 (1951).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Berman, D. J. Paleont. 50, 165–174 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Berman, D. J. Paleont. 51, 986–991 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Zangerl, R. Am. Midl. Nat. 33, 764–780 (1945).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gans, C. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 119, 129–204 (1960).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gans, C. Trans, zool. Soc. Lond. 34, 347–416 (1978).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Estes, R., Queiroz, K. & Gauthier, J. in Phylogenetic Relationships of the Lizard Families (eds Estes, R. & Pregill, G.) 120–280 (Stanford Univ. Press, California, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rieppel, O. in The Phytogeny and Classification of the Tetrapods Vol. 1 (ed. Benton, M. J.) 261–294 (Clarendon, Oxford, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jerzykiewicz, T. et al. Can. J. Earth Sci. (in the press).

  14. Rage, J.-C. Pour La Sci. 1982, 16–27 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Greer, A. E. J. Herpetol. 19(1), 116–156 (1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Presch, W. in Phylogenetic Relationships of the Lizard Families (eds Estes, R. & Pregill, G.) 471–492 (Stanford Univ. Press, California, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bogert, C. Nat. Hist. 73, 17–24 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Rieppel, O. J. Zool. 195, 493–528 (1981).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Böhme, W. in Handbuch der Reptilien und Amphibien Europas Vol. 1 (ed. Böhme, W.) 275–276 (Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft, Wiesbaden, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Schwenk, K. In Phylogenetic Relationships of the Lizard Families (eds Estes, R. & Pregill, G.) 569–598 (Stanford Univ. Press, California, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sulminski, A. Palaeont. pol. 33, 25–102 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Estes, R. Handbuch der Paläoherpetologie Vol. 10A (Fischer, Stuttgart, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Rieppel, O. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 89, 41–62 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Rage, J.-C. Handbuch der Paläoherpetologie Vol. 11 (Fischer, Stuttgart, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Bellairs, A.d'A. & Gans, C. Nature, 302, 243–244 (1983).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. Eberth, D. A. Can. J. Earth Sci. (in the press).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wu, Xc., Brinkman, D., Russell, A. et al. Oldest known amphisbaenian from the Upper Cretaceous of Chinese Inner Mongolia. Nature 366, 57–59 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1038/366057a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/366057a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing