Letter | Published:

The origin of Pluto's peculiar orbit

Naturevolume 365pages819821 (1993) | Download Citation

Subjects

Abstract

THE origin of Pluto's unusual orbit—the most eccentric and inclined of all the planets—remains a mystery. The orbits of Pluto and Neptune overlap, but close approaches of these two planets are prevented by the existence of a resonance condition1: Pluto's orbital period is exactly 3/2 that of Neptune, which ensures that the conjunctions always occur near Pluto's aphelion. Long-term orbit integrations2–5 have uncovered other subtle resonances and near-resonances, and indicate that Pluto's orbit is chaotic yet remains macroscopically stable over billion-year timescales. A suggestion4 that the orbit may have evolved purely by chaotic dynamics appears unlikely in light of recent orbital stability studies6, unless one appeals to a well-timed collision to place Pluto in its stable orbit19. Here I show that Pluto could have acquired its current orbit during the late stages of planetary accretion, when the jovian planets underwent significant orbital migration as a result of encounters with residual planetesimals7. As Neptune moved outwards, a small body like Pluto in an initially circular orbit could have been captured into the 3:2 resonance, following which its orbital eccentricity would rise rapidly to its current Neptune-crossing value.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1

    Cohen, C. J. & Hubbard, E. C. Astr. J. 70, 10–13 (1965).

  2. 2

    Williams, J. G. & Benson, G. S. Astr. J. 76, 167–177 (1971).

  3. 3

    Applegate, J. H., Douglas, M. R., Gursel, J., Sussman, G. J. & Wisdom, J. Astr. J. 92, 176–194 (1986).

  4. 4

    Sussman, G. J. & Wisdom, J. Science 241, 433–437 (1988).

  5. 5

    Milani, A., Nobili, A. M. & Carpino, M. Icarus 82, 200–217 (1989).

  6. 6

    Levison, H. F. & Duncan, M. J. Astrophys. J. 406, L35–L38 (1993).

  7. 7

    Fernandez, J. A. & Ip, W. H. Icarus 58, 109–120 (1984).

  8. 8

    Weissman, P. R. Nature 344, 825–830 (1990).

  9. 9

    Strom, S. E., Edwards, S. & Strom, K. M. in The Formation and Evolution of Planetary Systems (eds Weaver, H. A. & Danly, L.) 91–107 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1989).

  10. 10

    Brouwer, D. & Clemence, G. M. Methods of Celestial Mechanics (Academic, New York, 1961).

  11. 11

    Dermott, S. F., Malhotra, R. & Murray, C. D. Icarus 76, 295–334 (1988).

  12. 12

    Wisdom, J. & Holman, M. Astr. J. 102, 1528–1538 (1991).

  13. 13

    Saha, P. & Tremaine, S. Astr. J. 104, 1633–1640 (1992).

  14. 14

    Malhotra, R. Celestial Mech. and Dynamical Astr. (submitted).

  15. 15

    Levison, H. F. & Stern, S. A. Lunar planet. Sci. 24, 869–870 (1993).

  16. 16

    Knezevic, Z., Milani, A., Farinella, P., Froeschle, Ch. & Froeschle, Cl. Icarus 93, 316–330 (1991).

  17. 17

    McKinnon, W. B. Nature 311, 355–358 (1984).

  18. 18

    Duncan, M. J. & Quinn, T. A. Rev. Astr. Astrophys. 31, 265–295 (1993).

  19. 19

    Levison, H. F. & Stern, S. A. in Pluto—Charon Conf., 6–9 July 1993, Flagstaff, Arizona, USA.

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Lunar and Planetary Institute, 3600 Bay Area Boulevard, Houston, Texas, 77058, USA

    • Renu Malhotra

Authors

  1. Search for Renu Malhotra in:

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Issue Date

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/365819a0

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.