Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Rare species, the coincidence of diversity hotspots and conservation strategies


SPECIES conservation in situ requires networks of protected areas selected for high conservation interest1–3. Throughout most of the world, however, there are neither the resources nor the time to carry out detailed inventories for most taxa2,4 before designating protected areas. Site selection (on grounds other than availability) would be easier and more effective if two things were true: (1) habitats that are species-rich for one taxon are also species-rich for others5; and (2) rare1 species occur in, and therefore benefit from the conservation of, species-rich habitats. Diversity (usually, species richness) and the presence of rare species are the most frequently cited criteria for site selection by conservationists6–8. Here, we use data on British plants and animals held by the Biological Records Centre (BRC)9 and the British Trust for Ornithology (BTO), mapped on a grid of 10 km × 10 km ('10 km squares') to examine the extent to which species-rich areas for different taxa coincide, and whether species-rich areas contain substantial numbers of rare species. The fine scale and high intensity of recording in Britain produces distributional datasets at least as good as and, in most cases, better than those available elsewhere. For Britain at least, we do not find strong support for either proposition. Species-rich areas ('hotspots'10) frequently do not coincide for different taxa, and many rare species do not occur in the most species-rich squares.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others


  1. Soulé, M. (ed.) Conservation Biology (Sinauer, Sunderland, Mass., 1986).

  2. Groombridge, B. (ed.) Global Diversity: Status of the Earth's Living Resources (Chapman & Hall, London, 1992).

  3. Pressey, R. L., Humphries, C. J., Margules, C. R., Vane-Wright, R. I. & Williams, P. H. Trends Ecol. Evol. 8, 124–128 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Raven, P. H. & Wilson, E. O. Science, 258, 1099–1100 (1992).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Pearson, D. L. & Cassola, F. Cons. Biol. 6, 376–391 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Margules, C. & Usher, M. B. Biol. Conserv. 21, 79–109 (1981).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Usher, M. B. (ed.) Wildlife Conservation Evaluation (Chapman & Hall, London, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Scott, M. J. et al. Wildl. Monogr. 123, 1–41 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Harding, P. T. & Sheail, J. Biological Recording of Changes in British Wildlife (ed. Harding, P. T.) 5–19 (HMSO, London, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Myers, N. The Environmentalist 8, 187–208 (1988).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kremen, C. Ecol. Appl. 2, 203–217 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Rorslett, B. Aquat. Bot. 39, 173–179 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Williams, P. H. & Gaston, K. J. Biol. Conserv. (in the press).

  14. Dury, W. H. Biol. Conserv. 6, 162–169 (1974).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Rabinowitz, D. Biological Aspects of Rare Plant Conservation (ed. Synge. H.) 205–217 (Wiley, New York, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Thomas, C. D. & Mallorie, H. C. Biol. Conserv. 33, 95–117 (1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Perring, F. H. & Farrell, L. British Red Data Books: 1, Vascular Plants 2nd edn (RSNC, Nettleham, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Stewart, A. & Pearman, D. BSBI (Botanical Society of the British Isles) News 57, 17–21 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  19. International Council for Bird Preservation Putting Biodiversity on the Map: Priority Areas for Global Conservation (International Council for Bird Preservation, Cambridge, 1992).

  20. Vane-Wright, R. I., Humphries, C. J. & Williams, P. H. Biol. Conserv. 55, 235–254 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Crozier, R. H. Biol. Conserv. 61, 11–15 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Gibbons, D. W., Reid, J. B. & Chapman, R. A. The New Atlas of Breeding Birds in Britain and Ireland: 1988–91 (in the press).

  23. Prendergast, J. R., Wood, S. N., Lawton, J. H. & Eversham, B. C. Biodiversity Lett. (in the press).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Prendergast, J., Quinn, R., Lawton, J. et al. Rare species, the coincidence of diversity hotspots and conservation strategies. Nature 365, 335–337 (1993).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:

This article is cited by


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing