Abstract
RELATIVE motion is one of the most salient cues for segmentation of a visual scene into separate objects. This is illustrated by the vivid contours that are perceived when random dot patterns move in different directions1,2. Once motion is halted in such displays the segmentation contours disappear. This makes random dot patterns ideal for the study of contour from motion processing in isolation. Contour from motion processing obviously relies on direction-selective neurons, which are found in many visual cortical areas3–5. It is, however, largely unknown at what level of processing their signals interact to serve the global process of motion-based image segmentation. To answer this quesion, we recorded visually evoked potentials, both in man and in awake monkey, to a stimulus specifically designed to signal the presence of neuronal activity related to contour from motion processing. We report here that response components specific to contour from motion were elicited only when the stimulus yielded a contour percept. In awake monkey, the sources of these components were located within the supra-and infra-granular layers of primary visual cortex. We conclude that VI is involved in image segmentation processing,
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Relevant articles
Open Access articles citing this article.
-
Cognitive penetrability of scene representations based on horizontal image disparities
Scientific Reports Open Access 25 October 2022
-
Image Segmentation Based on Relative Motion and Relative Disparity Cues in Topographically Organized Areas of Human Visual Cortex
Scientific Reports Open Access 26 June 2019
-
Representation of motion boundaries in retinotopic human visual cortical areas
Nature Open Access 10 July 1997
Access options
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
£199.00
only £3.90 per issue
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Buy article
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
$32.00
All prices are NET prices.
References
Julesz, B. Foundations of Cyclopean Perception (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1971).
Braddick, O. J. Vision Res. 14, 519 (1974).
Van Essen, D. C. in Cerebral Cortex 3, Visual Cortex (eds Peters, A. C. & Jones, E. G.) (Plenum, New York, London, 1985).
Nakayama, K., Vision Res. 25, 427–433 (1985).
Maunsell, J. H. R. & Newsome, W. T. A. Rev. Neurosci. 10, 363–401 (1987).
Nicholson, C. & Freeman, J. A. J. Neurophysiol. 38, 356–368 (1975).
Mitzdorf, U. Physiol. Rev. 65, 37–100 (1985).
Lamme, V. A. F., Van Dijk, B. W. & Spekreijse H. Vision Res. 32, 797–807 (1992).
Lamme, V. A. F., Van Dijk, B. W. & Spekreijse, H. Visual Neurosci. (in the press).
Blasdel, G. G., Lund, J. S. & Fitzpatrick, D. J. Neurosci. 5, 3350–3369 (1985).
Hildreth, E. C. & Koch, C. A. Rev. Neurosci. 10, 477–533 (1987).
Nothdurft, H. C. & Li, C. Y. Vision Res. 25, 99–113 (1985).
Allman, J., Miezin, F. & McGuiness E. A. Rev. Neurosci. 8, 407–430 (1985).
Orban, G. A., Gulyas, B. & Vogels, R. J. Neurophysiol. 57, 1792–1812 (1987).
Gilbert, C. D. & Wiesel, T. N. Vision Res. 30, 1689–1701 (1990).
Sporns, O., Tononi, G. & Edelman, G. M. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 88, 129–133 (1991).
Dagnelie, G., Spekreijse, H. & Van Dijk, B. W. Vis. Neurosci. 3, 509–525 (1989).
Schimmel, H. Science 157, 92–94 (1967).
Kraut, M. A., Arezzo, J. C. & Vaughan, H. G. Jr Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol. 62, 300–312 (1985).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lamme, V., van Dijk, B. & Spekreijse, H. Contour from motion processing occurs in primary visual cortex. Nature 363, 541–543 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1038/363541a0
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/363541a0
This article is cited by
-
Cognitive penetrability of scene representations based on horizontal image disparities
Scientific Reports (2022)
-
Image Segmentation Based on Relative Motion and Relative Disparity Cues in Topographically Organized Areas of Human Visual Cortex
Scientific Reports (2019)
-
Perceptual separation of transparent motion components: the interaction of motion, luminance and shape cues
Experimental Brain Research (2013)
-
Visual Evoked Potentials and Reaction Time Measurements to Motion-reversal Luminance- and Texture-defined Stimuli
Documenta Ophthalmologica (2005)
-
Neuronal synchrony does not represent texture segregation
Nature (1998)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.