Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Kinship affects morphogenesis in cannibalistic salamanders

Abstract

INCLUSIVE fitness theory predicts that organisms can often increase their fitness by helping relatives1. Indeed, many animals modify their behaviour towards kin in a fashion consistent with theory2–4. Morphogenesis may also be sensitive to kinship environment, especially in species that facultatively produce distinct morphs that differ in their ability to harm relatives, such as those that produce alternative cannibalistic and non-cannibalistic phenotypes5–9. We tested this hypothesis by examining whether consanguinity affected the probability that structurally distinctive cannibal morphs5,10 would develop in larval Arizona tiger salamanders (Ambystoma tigrinum nebulosum). We report here that when tiger salamander larvae are reared in mixed-brood groups they are significantly more likely to develop the cannibal morphology and at an earlier age than siblings reared in pure-sibship groups. In general, morphogenesis may be responsive to kinship in any species that facultatively develops structures that can be used against conspecifics as weaponry.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hamilton, W. D. J. theor. Biol. 7, 1–52 (1964).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Sherman, P. W. Behavl Ecol. Sociobiol. 8, 251–259 (1981).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Emlen, S. T. & Wrege, P. H. Behavl Ecol. Sociobiol. 25, 303–319 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Packer, C., Gilbert, D. A., Pusey, A. E. & O'Brien, S. J. Nature 351, 562–565 (1991).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Powers, J. H. Stud. Univ. Nebraska 7, 197–274 (1907).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Armstrong, J. T. Ecology 45, 361–365 (1964).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gilbert, J. J. Science 181, 63–66 (1973).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Pfennig, D. W. Evolution 46, 1408–1420 (1992).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Waddell, D. R. in Cannibalism. Ecology and Evolution among Diverse Taxa (eds Elgar, M. A. & Crespi, B. J.) 85–101 (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford. 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Pedersen, S. C. Amphibia-Reptilia 12, 1–14 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Collins, J. P. & Holomuzki, J. R. Can. J. Zool. 62, 168–174 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Reilly, S. M., Lauder, G. V. & Collins, J. P. Copeia 1992, 672–679 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Collins, J. P. & Cheek, J. E. Amer. Zool. 23, 77–84 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Pfennig, D. W., Loeb, M. L. G. & Collins, J. P. Oecologia 88, 161–166 (1991).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Rose, F. L. & Armentrout, D. J. anim. Ecol. 45, 713–729 (1976).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Travis, J. Evolution 34, 40–50 (1980).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Shvarts, S. S. & Pyastolova, O. A. Sov. J. Ecol. 1, 58–62 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Jasienski, M. Oecologia 77, 407–413 (1988).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Smith, D. C. Evolution 44, 1529–1541 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Waldman, B. in Kin Recognition (ed. Hepper, P. G.) 162–219 (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1991).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  21. Hepper, P. G. Kin Recognition (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1991).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  22. West-Eberhard, M. J. A. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 20, 249–278 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Crespi, B. J. Behavl Ecol. Sociobiol. 23, 93–104 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Grbic, M., Ode, P. J. & Strand, M. R. Nature 360, 254–256 (1992).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. Godfray, H. C. J. Am. Nat. 129, 221–233 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Parker, G. A., Mock, D. W. & Lamey, T. C. Am. Nat. 133, 846–868 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Conover, W. J. Practical Nonparametric Statistics (Wiley, New York. 1980).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pfennig, D., Collins, J. Kinship affects morphogenesis in cannibalistic salamanders. Nature 362, 836–838 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1038/362836a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/362836a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing